Aboh, E. O.
(2009) Clause structure and verb series. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adger, D.
(2013) A Syntax of Substance. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. Y.
(2006) Serial Verb Constructions in a Typological Perspective. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Serial verb constructions: a cross-linguistic typology (pp. 1–87). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Versatile cases. Journal of Linguistics, 44, 565–603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aissen, J.
(2003) Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A.
(2001) Functional structure in nominals. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A., Haegeman, L., & Stavrou, M.
(2007) Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Schäfer, F.
(2009) PP licensing in nominalizations. In A. Schardl, M. Walkow, & M. Abdurrahman (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 38 (pp. 39–52). Ottawa, GLSA.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A., & Stavrou M.
(2011) Ethnic adjectives as pseudo-adjectives. Studia Linguistica, 65, 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Schäfer, F.
(2015) External arguments in transitivity alternations. Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariste, P.
(1997) A grammar of the Votic language. Bloomington and The Hague, Indiana University Press and Mouton.Google Scholar
Arkhangelskiy T., & Usacheva, M.
(2015) Syntactic and Morphosyntactic Properties of Postpositional Phrases in Beserman Udmurt as Part-of-Speech Criteria. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 28, 103–137.Google Scholar
Arsenijevic, B., Boleda, G., Gehrke, B., & McNally, L.
(2014) Ethnic adjectives are proper adjectives. In R. Baglini, T. Grinsell, J. Keane, A. Roth Singerman, & J. Thomas (Eds.), CLS-46-I the main session: 46th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 17–30). Chicago, IL, Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Asbury, A.
(2008) The Morphosyntax of Case and Adpositions. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht.
Avril, Y.
(2006) Parlons Komi. Paris, L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Bach, E.
(1986) The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 5–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baerman, M., Brown, D. & Corbett, G.
(2005) The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baggio, P. & Caircross, A.
(2020) The syntax of Puss in Boots and Sleeping Beauty. Proper names between productivity and atomicity, Proceedings of ConSOLE XXVIII.Google Scholar
Bahrami-Khorshid, S., & Golfam, A.
(2013) Encoding the Agent in Persian Passive Construction: A Cognitive Approach. International Journal of Humanities, 20(4), 79–97.Google Scholar
Baker, M.
(1988) Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1989) Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(4), 513–553.Google Scholar
(1991) On the Relation of Serialization to Verb Extensions. In C. Lefebvre (Ed.), Serial verbs: Grammatical, comparative and cognitive approaches (pp. 79–102). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) Thematic conditions on syntactic structures: Evidence from locative applicatives. In I. M. Roca (Ed.), Thematic structure: Its role in grammar (pp. 23–46). Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Lexical Categories. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., & Kriegel, S.
(2013) Mauritian Creole structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Bakker, P.
(2003) Pidgin inflectional morphology and its implications for creole morphology. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2002 (pp. 3–33), Dordrecht, Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baldi, B., & Savoia, L. M.
(2019) Possessives in North-Calabrian dialectsQULSO -Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica, 7, 19–40.Google Scholar
(2021) Possessives, from Franco-Provencal and Occitan systems to contact dialects in Apulia and Calabria. Languages, 6(2), 63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barat, C., Carayol, M., & Vogel, C.
(1977) Kriké kraké: recueil de contes créoles réunionnais. Paris, CNRS.Google Scholar
Barker, C.
(1995) Possessive Descriptions. Stanford, CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bartning, I.
(1980) Remarkes sur la syntaxe et la semantique des pseudo adjectif de nominaux en francais. Stockholm, Almvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Barwise, J., & Cooper, R.
(1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 159–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassaganyas-Bars T.
(2015) The rise of haver as the existential predicate and the perfect auxiliary: the case of Old Catalan. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19, 107–124.Google Scholar
Baxter, A. N.
(1988) A grammar of Kristang (Malacca Creole Portuguese). Canberra, Pacific Linguistics, Australian National University.Google Scholar
(2013) Papiá Kristang structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Beavers, J.
(2011) On affectedness. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29(2), 335–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beck, S., & K. Johnson
. (2004) Double objects again. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 97–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A.
(2004) Aspects of the low IP area. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The Structure of IP and CP (pp. 16–51). Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Extended doubling and the VP periphery. Probus, 17, 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Labeling (Romance) causatives. Manuscript. Universities of Geneva & Siena. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellucci, G.
(2017) Oblique subjects: theoretical and experimental perspectives. Ph.D. Dissertation, Università di Firenze.Google Scholar
Belvin, R. S.
(1996) Inside Events: The Non-Possessive Meanings of Possession Predicates and the Semantic Conceptualization of Events. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Belvin, R. S., & den Dikken, M.
(1997) There, happens, to, be, have. Lingua, 101, 151–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentley, D.
(2013) Subject canonicality and definiteness effects in Romance “there” sentences. Language, 89, 675–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Copular and existential constructions. In A. Dufter, & E. Stark (Eds.), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax (pp. 332–366). Berlin, De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentley, D., Ciconte, F. M., & Cruschina, S.
(2015) Existential and Locatives in Romance Dialects of Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, É.
(1966) Problèmes de linguistique générale 1. Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
Berwick, R., & Chomsky, N.
(2011) The biolinguistic program: The current state of its evolution and development. In A. M. DiSciullo, & C. Boeckx (Eds.), The Biolinguistic Enterprise (pp. 19–41). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biagui, N. B., & Quint, N.
(2013) Casamancese Creole structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Bickerton, D.
(1981) Roots of Language. Ann Arbor, Karoma.Google Scholar
(1984) The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behaviour and brain sciences, 7(2), 173–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) Seselwa serialization and its significance. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 4, 155–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisang, W.
(1992) Das Verb im Chinesischen, Hmong, Vietnamesischen, Thai und Khmer. Vergleichende Grammatik im Rahmen der Verb­serialisierung, der Grammatikalisierung und der Attraktor­positionen. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
(1998) Adverbials: The view from the Far East. In J. van der Auwera & D. P. O´Baoill (Eds.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe (pp. 641–812). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blake, B.
(2001) Case. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, J.
(2012) Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C.
(2009) The nature of merge. Consequences for language, mind and biology. In M. Piatelli Palmarini (Ed.), Of minds and language (pp. 44–57). Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boleda, G., Evert, S., Gehrke, B., & McNally, L.
(2012) Adjectives as saturators vs. modifiers: Statistical evidence. In M. Aloni, V. Kimmelman, F. Roelofsen, G. Weidman Sassoon, K. Schulz, & M. Westera (Eds.), Logic, language and meaning – 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 19–21, 2011, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 112–121). Dordrecht, Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bollée, A. & Marcel, R.
(1994) Parol ek memwar. Récits de vie des Seychelles. Hamburg, Buske.Google Scholar
Boneh, N., & Sichel, I.
(2010) Deconstructing possession. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28, 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boneh, N., & Nash, L.
(2012) Core and non-core datives in French. In B. Fernández & R. Etxepare (Eds.), Variation in datives: A Microcomparative Perspective (pp. 22–49). Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H.
(2003) Exo-Skeletal vs. Endo-Skeletal Explanations: Syntactic Projections and the Lexicon. In J. Moore & M. Polinsky (Eds.), The Nature of Explanation in Linguistics Theory (pp. 31–67). Stanford, CLSI Publications.Google Scholar
(2005) In name only, Structuring sense, vol I. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Derived Nominals and the Domain of Content. Lingua, 141, 71–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borschev, V. & Partee, B.
(2001) The Russian genitive of negation in existentials sentences: The role of Theme-Rheme structure reconsidered. Prague Linguistic Circle Papers / Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague, 4, 185–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, I. & Picallo, C.
(1996) Postnominal adjectives in Spanish DPs. Journal of Linguistics, 32, 349–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bossong, G.
(1985) Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den Neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Bowden, J.
(2001) Taba: description of a South Halmahera language. Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University, Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J., & Moshi, L.
(1990) Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 147–185.Google Scholar
Bruening, B.
(2012) By phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax, 16, 1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruyn, A., Muysken, P., & Verrips, M.
(1999) Double-object constructions in the creole languages: development and acquisition. In Michel DeGraff (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and development (pp. 329–373). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buell, L., & Sy, M.
(2006) Affix ordering In Wolof applicatives and causatives. In J. Mugane, J. P. Hutchison, & D. A. Worman (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics (pp. 214–224). Somerville, Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bunting, J.
(2009) ‘Give’ and ‘take’: How dative gi contributed to the decline of ditransitive taki. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 24, 199–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caha, P.
(2009) The nanosyntax of case. PhD dissertation, CASTL & University of Tromsø.
(2016) gen.sg = nom.pl: A mystery solved? Linguistica Brunensia, 64, 25–40.Google Scholar
(2017) How (not) to derive a *ABA: the case of Blansitt’s generalisation. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 2(1), 84–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calabrese, A.
(1998) Some remarks on the Latin case system and its development in Romance. In J. Lema, & E. Treviño (Eds.), Theoretical advances on Romance Languages (pp. 71–126). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) On absolute and contextual syncretism. In A. Nevins & A. Bachrach (Eds.), The bases of inflectional identity (pp. 156–205). Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capistrán Garza, A.
(2015) Multiple object constructions in P’orhépecha: Argument realization and valence-affecting morphology. Leiden, Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A.
(1998) On the deficient/strong opposition in possessive systems. In A. Alexiadou, & C. Wilder (Eds.), Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase (pp. 17–53). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. & Starke, M.
(1999) The typology of structural deficiency. A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe (pp. 145–233). Berlin, Mouton-De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A., & Giusti, G.
(2016) The syntax of the Italian indefinite determiner dei. Lingua, 181, 58–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Micro-variation in the Possessive Systems of Italian Dialects. In J. Emonds, M. Janebová, & L, Veselovská (Eds.), Language Use and Linguistic Structure. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium (pp. 137–154). Olomouc, Palacký University Press.Google Scholar
Cardoso, H. C.
(2009) The Indo-Portuguese language of Diu. Utrecht, LOT.Google Scholar
Carlson, G.
(1977) Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Carlson, R.
(1991) Grammaticalisation of postpositions and word order in Senufo languages. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. Vol. 2: Focus on types of grammatical markers (pp. 201–223). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstens, V.
(2002) Antisymmetry and word order in serial constructions. Language, 78(1), 3–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Champollion L., & Krifka, M.
(2016) Mereology. In M. Aloni, & P. Dekker (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics (pp. 369–388). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chappell, H. M.
(2015) Diversity in Sinitic languages. Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G.
(1998a) Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events in Grammar (pp. 53–104). Kluwer, Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998b) Partitives, reference to kinds and semantic variation. In A. Lawson (Ed.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 7) (pp. 73–98).Google Scholar
(2010) Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese, 174: 99–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, Foris.Google Scholar
(1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step, essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2001a) Derivation by Phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, (pp. 1–54). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITWPL.Google Scholar
(2013) Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Problems of projection: Extensions. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann, & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond -studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, (pp. 3–16). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) The UCLA Lectures (April 29 – May 2, 2019). [URL]Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á, J., & Ott, D.
(2019) Generative Grammar and the Faculty of Language: Insights, Questions and Challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, Special Issue, 229–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chumakina, M.
(2011) Nominal periphrasis. A canonical approach. Studies in Language, 35, 247–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G.
(1994) On the Evidence for Partial N-Movement in the Romance DP. In G. Cinque, J. Koster, J-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi, & R. Zanuttini (Eds.), Paths Towards Universal Grammar. Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, 85–110. Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(2007) La natura grammaticale del diminutivo e del vezzeggiativo. In R. Maschi, N. Penello, & P. Rizzolatti (Eds.), Miscellanea di studi liguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi padovani (pp. 229–236). Udine, Forum.Google Scholar
(2010a) Mapping Spatial PPs: an Introduction. In G. Cinque & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs, The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6 (pp. 3–25). New York, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010b) The Syntax of Adjectives: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Augmentative, pejorative, diminutive and endearing heads in the extended nominal projection. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann, & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond -studies in honour of Adriana Belletti (pp. 67–81). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G., & Rizzi, L.
(2010) The cartography of syntactic structures. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 51–65). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clements, J. C.
(2013) Korlai structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Cole, P.
(1983) The grammatical role of the causee in Universal Grammar. International Journal of American Linguistics, 49, 115–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, C.
(1997) Argument sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry, 28(3), 461–497.Google Scholar
(2005) A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax, 8, 81–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colot S, & Ludwig, R.
(2013a) Guadeloupean Creole structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
(2013b) Martinican Creole structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Comrie, B.
(1976) Aspect. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Spatial cases in Daghestanian languages. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 52, 108–117.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. & Polinsky, M.
(1998) The great Daghestanian case hoax. In A. Siewierska & J. J. Song (Eds.), Case, Typology and Grammar: In Honor of Barry J. Blake (pp. 95–114). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G.
(2011) Number. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corne, C, Coleman D., & Curnow, S.
(1996) Clause reduction in asyndetic coordination in Isle de France creole: The ‘serial verbs’ problem. In P. Baker & A. Syea (Eds.), Changing meanings, changing functions (pp. 129–154). London, University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Coupe, A.
(2008) A Grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, C., & Hale, K.
(1988) Relational Preverbs in Some Languages of the Americas: Typological and Historical Perspectives. Language, 64, 312–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
(2006) Encoding the distinction between location, source, and destination. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories (pp. 19–28). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, D.
(2010) Benefactive applicative periphrases: a typological approach. In F. Zúñiga & S. Kittilä (Eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies (pp. 29–69). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels D.
(2014) Existential predication in typological perspective. Ms., Université Lyon.Google Scholar
Crocco Galèas, G.
(1991) Gli etnici italiani: studio di morfologia naturale. Padova, Unipress.Google Scholar
Cruschina, S.
(2015) Patterns of variation in existential constructions. Isogloss. A journal on variation of Romance and Iberian languages, 1(1), 33–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuervo, M. C.
(2003) Datives at large. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
(2010) Two types of (apparently) ditransitive light verbs constructions. In K. Arregi, Z. Fagyal, S. A. Montrul, & A. Tremblay (Eds.), Romance Linguistics 2008. Interaction in Romance. Selected Papers from the 38th. Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. Urbana-Champaign, April 2008 (pp. 139–154). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl Ö., & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M.
(2001) Kinship in grammar. In I. Baron, M. Herslund & F. Sørensen (Eds.), Dimensions of Possession, (pp. 201–243). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dardano, M.
(2008) Costruire parole. Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
David, A.
(2014) Descriptive Grammar of Pashto and its Dialects. Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Belder, M.
(2011) A morphosyntactic decomposition of countability in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 14 (3), 173-202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Belder, M., Faust, N. & Lampitelli, N.
(2014) On a low and a high diminutive. In A. Alexiadou, H. Borer, & F. Schäfer (Eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax (pp. 149–163). Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Déchaine, R-M., Girard, R., Mudzingwa, C., & Wiltschko, M.
(2014) The internal syntax of Shona class prefixes. Language Sciences, 43, 18–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M.
(2001) On the Origin of Creoles: A Cartesian Critique of Neo-Darwinian Linguistics. Linguistic Typology, 5(2–3), 213–310.Google Scholar
(2003) Against Creole Exceptionalism. Language, 79(2), 391–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Kreyòl Ayisyen or Haitian Creole. In J. Holm, & P. Patrick (Eds.), Comparative creole syntax. Parallel outlines of 18 creole grammars (pp. 101–126). London/Colombo: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Demirdache, H., & Uribe-Etxebarria, M.
(2000) The primitives of temporal relations. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step, essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 157–186. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Den Dikken, M.
(1991) Serial Verbs, ‘Object Sharing’, and the Analysis of Dative Shift. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 8, 31–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) Particles. New York, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Relators and linkers: A study of predication, predicate inversion and copulas. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs. In G. Cinque & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs, The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6 (pp. 74–126). New York, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, M., & Dékány, É.
(2018) Adpositions and case: Alternative realisation and concord. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics 7(2).Google Scholar
Devonish, H., & Thompson, D.
(2013) “Creolese”. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I: English-based and Dutch-based languages (pp. 49–60). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Di Garbo, F.
(2014) Gender and its interaction with number and evaluative morphology: An intra- and intergeneralogical typological survey of Africa. PhD Dissertation. Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Durie, M.
(1988) Verb Serialization and ‘Verbal Prepositions’ in Oceanic Languages. Oceanic Linguistics, 27(1–2), 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) Grammatical structures in verb serialization. In A. Alsina, J. Bresnan, & P. Sells (Eds.), Complex predicates (pp. 289–354). Stanford, CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Ehrhart S., & Revis, M.
(2013) Tayo structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Ehrhart, S.
(1993) Le créole français de St-Louis (le tayo) en Nouvelle-Calédonie. Hamburg, Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Emonds, J.
(1985) A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht, Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, A.
(2007a) (Axial) parts and wholes. Nordlyd, 34, 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007b) The internal syntactic structure of Relational adjectives. Probus, 19(1), 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015a) Una nota sobre locativos y acusativos.” Archivum, LXV, 57–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Direccionales con con y Marcado Diferencial de Objeto. Revue Romane 50, 163–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Morphologically Derived Adjectives in Spanish. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faraclas, N.
(1996) Nigerian Pidgin. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Farquharson, J. T.
(2013) Jamaican structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Feist, T. R.
(2010) A Grammar of Skolt Saami. Ph.D dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Filbeck, D.
(1975) A grammar of verb serialization in Thai. In J. G. Harris, & J. R. Chamberlain (Eds.), Studies in Tai linguistics in honor of William J. Gedney (pp. 112–129). Bangkok, Central Institute of English Language.Google Scholar
Filchenko, A. Y.
(2007) A Grammar of Eastern Khanty. PhD dissertation, Rice University.
Filip, H.
(1999) Aspect, situation types and noun phrase semantics. New York, Garland.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1968) The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
(1986) Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 95–107. Berkeley, CA, BLS. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finney, M. A.
(2013) Krio structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Folli, R., & Harley, H.
(2007) Causation, obligation, and argument structure: on the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(2), 197–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, R.
(2008) Complex PPs in Italian. In A. Asbury, J. Dotlačil, B. Gehrke, & R. Nouwen (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P (pp. 197–220). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, R., Harley, H., & Karimi, S.
(2005) Determinants of event structure in Persian complex predicates. Lingua, 115, 1365–1401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forman, M. L.
(1972) Zamboangueño texts with grammatical analysis. A Study of Philippine Creole Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Z.
(2012) A Grammar of Wandala. Berlin, De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francez, I.
(2007) Existential propositions. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
(2009) Existentials, predication, and modification. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32: 1–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francez, I., & Koontz-Garboden, A.
(2016) A note on possession and mereology in Ulwa property concept constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 34, 93–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Semantics and morphosyntactic variation: Qualities and the grammar of property concepts. Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, L.
(2013) Before strikes back: An *ABA constraint on temporal expressions. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 60(3), 265–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015a) The morphosyntax of adverbs of thecarpone/i type in (Old and Modern) Italian. Probus, 27(2), 271–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Axial Parts, phi-features and degrammaticalization. Transactions of the Philological Society, 114, 149–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) On Nominalization: Genitives, Datives, and Elementary Predicates in Italian. In A. Bloch-Rozmej, & A. Bondaruk (Eds.), Studies in Formal Linguistics Universal Patterns and Language Specific Parameters (pp. 73–90). Frankfurt, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2020) (Im)proper prepositions in (Old and Modern) Italian. In L. Franco & P. Lorusso (Eds.), Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation (pp. 249–272). Berlin, De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, L., Baldi, B. & Savoia, L. M.
(2020) Collectivizers in Italian (and beyond). The interplay between collectivizing and evaluating morphology (and the Div paradox). Studia Linguistica, 74, 2–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, L., Bellucci, G., Dal Pozzo, L., & Manzini, M. R.
(2017) Locatives, Part and Whole in Uralic. In J. Emonds & M. Janebovà (Eds.), Language Use and Linguistic Structure – selected proceedings of OLINCO 2016 (pp. 283–304). Olomouc, Palacky University Press.Google Scholar
Franco, L., & Lorusso, P.
(2019) The expression of proper location and beyond: motion-to and state-in in Italian spatial adpositions. In M. Baird & J. Pesetsky (Eds), NELS 49: Proceedings of the Forty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society: Volume 1 (pp. 279–290). GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
(2020) Aspectual datives (and instrumentals). In A. Pineda & J. Mateu (Eds.), Dative constructions in Romance and beyond (pp. 175–194). Berlin, Language Science Press.Google Scholar
(2022) Derivational Relators in Italian. Languages, 7(2): 130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, L., Manzini M. R., & Savoia, L. M.
(2015a) N Class and Its Interpretation: The Neuter in Central Italian Varieties and Its Implications. Isogloss. A Journal on Variation of Romance and Iberian Languages, 1, 41–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Linkers and agreement. The Linguistic Review, 32(2), 277–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021) Locative PS as general relators. Location, direction, DOM in Romance. Linguistic Variation, 21, 135–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, L., & Manzini, M. R.
(2017a) Genitive/‘of’ Arguments in DOM Contexts. Revue Roumaine De Linguistique, LXII, 427–444.Google Scholar
(2017b) Instrumental prepositions and case: Contexts of occurrence and alternations with datives. Glossa, 2(1), 8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeze, R.
(1992) Existentials and other locatives. Language, 68(3), 553–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Á.
(2010) Phase Theory. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ganfi, V., & Piunno, V.
(2017) Preposizioni complesse in italiano antico e contemporaneo. Grammaticalizzazione, schematismo e produttività. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, CII(2), 184–204.Google Scholar
Garzonio, J., & Rossi, S.
(2016) Case in Italian Complex PPs. In E. Carrilho, A. Fiéis, M. Lobo & S. Pereira (Eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 28, Lisbon (pp. 121–138). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavarro, A. & Heshmati, Y.
(2014) An investigation on the comprehension of Persian passives in typical development and autism. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 13, 79–98.Google Scholar
George, I.
(1975) Typology of verb serialization. Journal of West African Languages, 10(1), 78–97.Google Scholar
Gerdts, D., & Hinkson, M.
(2004) The grammaticalization of Halkomelem ‘face’ into a dative applicative suffix. International Journal of American Linguistics, 70(3), 227–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghomeshi, J.
(1997) Non-Projecting Nouns and the Ezafe: Construction in Persian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 15, 729–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giusti, G.
(2015) Nominal Syntax at the Interfaces. A Comparative Study of Languages with Articles. Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
(1975) Serial verbs and syntactic change. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Word order and word order change (pp. 47–112). Austin, University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Goury, L. & Migge, B.
(2003) Grammaire du nengee: Introduction aux langues aluku, ndyuka et pamaka. Paris, Editions IRD.Google Scholar
Grandi, N.
(2001) Su alcune presunte anomalie della morfologia valutativa. Archivio Glottologico, 86, 25–56.Google Scholar
(2003) Mutamenti innovativi e conservativi nella morfologia valutativa dell’italiano. Origine, sviluppo e diffusione del suffisso accrescitivo –one. In N. Maraschio, & T. Poggi Salani (Eds.), Italia linguistica anno Mille – Italia linguistica anno Duemila. Atti del XXXIV Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (pp. 243–258). Roma, Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Grimm, S.
(2011) Semantics of Case. Morphology, 21, 515–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Inverse Number Marking and Individuation in Dagaare. In D. Massam (Ed.), Count and Mass Across Languages (pp. 75–98). Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, J.
(1990a) Extended projection. Ms., Brandeis University.Google Scholar
(1990b) Argument structure. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hagège, C.
(2010) Adpositions. Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagemeijer, T.
(2000) Serial verb constructions in São-Tomense. MA thesis, University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
(2011) The Gulf of Guinea creoles. Genetic and typological relations. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 26(1), 111–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Santome structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Hagemeijer, T. & Ogie, O.
(2011) Edo influence on Santome: evidence from verb serialization and beyond. In C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Creoles, their substrates, and language typology (pp. 37–60). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haig, G.
(2008) Alignment Change in Iranian Languages: A Construction Grammar Approach. Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hajek, J.
(2006) Serial verbs in Tetun Dili. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Serial Verb Constructions: a Cross-Linguistic Typology (pp. 239–253). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Häkkinen, K.
(1996) Suomalaisten esihistoria kielitieteen valossa. Tietolipas 147. Helsinki, SKS.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, L.
(1979) Suomen kielen rakenne ja kehitys. (4th revised ed.). Otavan korkeakoulukirjasto. Helsinki, Otava.Google Scholar
Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J.
(1993) On argument structure and the lexical expression of grammatical relations. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 53–109). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M.
(1997) Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and Fission. In B. Bruening, Y. Kang, & M. McGinnis (Eds.), PF: Papers at the Interface, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30, (pp. 425–449). Cambridge, MA, MITWPL.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Marantz, A.
(1993) Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hanske, T.
(2007) Ditransitive constructions in Vietnamese: How to integrate serial verb constructions and systemic zero-anaphora in a typology of alignment patterns. Paper Presented at the Conference on Ditransitive Constructions 23–25 November 2007 Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Harley, H.
(2002) Possession and the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 2, 29–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) When is a Syncretism more than a Syncretism? In D. Harbour, D. Adger & S. Béjar (Eds.), Phi-Theory: Phi-features across Interfaces and Modules (pp. 251–294). Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In A. Giannakidou & M. Rathert (Eds.), Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization (pp. 321–343). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua, 125, 34-57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
(1993) A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Expletive subject of existential verb. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
(2019) Differential place marking and differential object markingSTUF - Language Typology and Universals, 72(3), 313-334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M., & Michaelis, S.
(2008) Leipzig fourmille de typologues: Genitive objects in comparison. In G. Corbett, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Case and grammatical relations: Studies in honor of Bernard Comrie (pp. 149–166). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B.
(1997) Possession. Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. & König, C.
(2010) On the linear order of ditransitive objects. Language Sciences, 32, 87–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
(2002) World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hemmings, C.
(2013) Causatives and applicatives: The case for polysemy in Javanese. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics, 16, 167–194.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, J.
(1985) On SemanticsLinguistic Inquiry, 16, 547–621.Google Scholar
(2009) Tense, Aspect, and Indexicality. Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, T.
(1999) Parallels between nominal and verbal projections. In D. Adger, S. Pintzuk, B. Plunkett, & G. Tsoulas (Eds.), Specifiers: Minimalist approaches (pp. 163–187). Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hohnerlein-Buchinger, T.
(1996) Per un sublessico vitivinicolo. La storia materiale e linguistica di alcuni nomi di viti e vini italiani. Tübingen, Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holm, J., & Patrick P. L.
(2007) Comparative Creole Syntax (Eds.). London/Colombo, Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A.
(2002) Prepositions and PPs in Zina Kotoko. In B. Kappel Schmidt, D. Odden, & A. Holmberg (Eds.), Some Aspects of the Grammar of Zina Kotoko (pp. 162–174). Munich, Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I.
(1992) Catalan (Descriptive Grammars). London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J., Li, Y.-H. A., & Li, Y.
(2009) The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huumo, T., & Ojutkangas, K.
(2006) An introduction to Finnish spatial relations: Local cases and adpositions. In M-L. Helasvuo & L. Campbell (Eds.), Grammar from the human perspective: Case, space and person in Finnish (pp. 11–20). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Intumbo, I., Inverno, L. & Holm, J.
(2013) Guinea-Bissau Kriyol structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Itkonen, T.
(1997) Reflections on PreUralic and the Saami-Finnic protolanguage. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen, 54, 229–266.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(1983) Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, J., & Grimes, C.
(2011) Aspect and directionality in Kupang Malay serial verb constructions: Calquing on the grammars of substrate languages. In C. Lefebvre (Ed.), Creoles, their substrates, and language typology (pp. 337–366). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R.
(1936) Contribution to the General Theory of Case: General Meanings of the Russian Cases. In L. Waugh & M. Halle (Eds.), Roman Jakobson. Russian and Slavic Grammar: Studies 1931–1981 (pp. 59–103). Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jansen, B, Koopman, H., & Muysken, P.
(1978) Serial verbs in the creole languages. Amsterdam Creole Studies, 2, 125–159.Google Scholar
Jeong, Y.
Jerro, K.
(2017) The causative–instrumental syncretism. Journal of Linguistics, 53, 751–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jóhannsdóttir, K.
(2012) Aspects of the progressive in English and Icelandic. PhD Dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Johns, A.
(1992) Deriving ergativity. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 57–87.Google Scholar
Johns, A. & Thurgood, B.
(2011) Axial Parts in Inuktitut and Uzbeki. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Josselin de Jong, J.P.B. de
. (1926) Het huidige Negerhollandsch (teksten en woordenlijst). Amsterdam, Koninklijke Academie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D.
(1996) Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language, 72(3), 533–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karimi, S.
(1997) Persian complex predicates and LF incorporation. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS), 33, 215–229.Google Scholar
Karimi, S, & Brame, M.
(1986) A generalization concerning the Ezafe construction in Persian. West Coast Conference in Linguistics (WECOL 86), Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R.
(1975) French syntax: the transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1984) Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht, Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2004a) ‘Here and There’. In C. Leclère, É. Laporte, M. Piot, & M. Silberztein (Eds.), Lexique, syntaxe, et lexique-grammaire (Syntax, Lexis, and Lexicon-Grammar): Papers in Honour of Maurice Gross (Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa, 24) (pp. 275–285). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004b) Prepositions as Probes. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3 (pp. 192–212). New York, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Movement and Silence. Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) A Short Note on Where vs. Place. In R. Maschi, N. Penello, & P. Rizzolatti (Eds.), Miscellanea di studi liguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi padovani (245–257). Udine, Forum.Google Scholar
(2010) Comparisons and contrasts. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E.
(1987) A semantic definition of indefinite NP. In E. Reuland & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness (pp. 286–317). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kenesei, István, Vago, R. M., & Fenyvesi, A.
(1998) Hungarian. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Kim, K.
(2012) Argument Structure Licensing and English have. Journal of Linguistics, 48(1), 71–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimenyi, A.
(1980) A Relational Grammar of Kinyarwanda. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P.
(2001) Structural Case in Finnish. Lingua, 111, 315–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, S. & Ylikoski, J.
(2011) Remarks on the coding of Goal, Recipient, and Vicinal Goal in European Uralic. In S. Kittilä, K. Västi, & J. Ylikoski (Eds.), Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles pp. (29–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klingler, T. A.
(2003) ‘If I could turn my tongue like that’: The Creole Language of Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana. Baton Rouge/London, Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Koopman, H.
(1984) The syntax of Verbs: from Verb movement rules in the Kru languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht, Foris.Google Scholar
(2000) Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles. In Hilda Koopman (Ed.), The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads (pp. 204–260). London, Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kouwenberg, S.
(2013) Papiamentu structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Kracht, M.
(2002) On the semantics of locatives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 157–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S.
(1980) Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kulikov, L.
(2009) Evolution of Case Systems. In A. Malchukov & A. Spencer (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Case (pp. 439–457). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Künnap, A.
(1999) Enets. München, Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Kuo, P-J.
(2010) Transitivity and the ba construction. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 8(1), 95–128.Google Scholar
La Fauci, N. & Loporcaro, M.
(1993) Grammatical relations and syntactic levels in Bonorvese morphosyntax. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Syntactic Theory and the Dialects of Italy (pp. 155–203). Torino, Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Laalo, K.
(2009) Acquisition of Case and Plural in Finnish. In U. Stephany & M. Voeikova (Eds.), Development of Nominal Inflection in first Language Acquisition: a Cross-Linguistic Perspective (pp 49–90). Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landman, F.
(1992) The progressive. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, R., & Yamakido, H.
(2008) Ezafe and the deep position of nominal modifiers. In L. McNally & C. Kennedy (Eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and discourse (pp. 43–70). Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, R., & V. Samiian
(2020) The Ezafe construction revisited. In R. Larson, S. Moradi & V. Samiian (Eds.), Advances in Iranian Linguistics (pp. 173–236). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, R.
(1988) On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), 335–392.Google Scholar
Lazard, G.
(1957) Grammaire du persan contemporain. Parigi, Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, A.
(2020) The causative construction in the dialects of southern Italy and the phonology syntax interface. In L. Franco, & P. Lorusso (Eds.), Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation (pp. 371–400). Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, C.
(1991) Take serial verb constructions in Fon. In C. Lefebvre (Ed.), Serial verbs: Grammatical, comparative and cognitive approaches (pp. 37–78). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian Creole. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Legate, J. A.
(2014) Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C.
(2018) Foundations of Body-Part Grammar, manuscript, University of Erfort.Google Scholar
Lehtinen, T.
(2007) Kielen vuosituhannet. Helsinki, SKS.Google Scholar
Lekakou, M. & Szendrői, K.
(2012) Polydefinites in Greek: Ellipsis, close apposition and expletive determiners. Journal of Linguistics, 48, 107–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, M.
(2008) Definiteness Effects and the Role of the Coda in Existential Constructions. In H. Hoeg-Müller & A. Klinge (Eds.), Essays on Nominal Determination (pp. 131–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levi, J. N.
(1978) The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, L.
(2011) Possessive WITH in Germanic: HAVE and the role of P. Syntax, 14(4), 355–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S, A.
(1976) Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and Topic (pp. 457–461). Austin, University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
(1981) Mandarin Chinese: a Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Y.
(1993) Structural head and aspectuality. Language, 69(3), 480–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, L. & Ansaldo, U.
(2013) Singlish structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Link, G.
(1983) The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-theoretical Approach. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, (pp. 302–323). Berlin, De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, G.
(1994) Reference and Proper Names: A Theory of N-Movement in Syntax and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 609–665.Google Scholar
(1996). The Syntax of N-Raising: A Minimalist Theory. OTS Working Papers. Utrecht, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
(2001) Formal syntax, diachronic minimalism, and etymology: The history of French chez. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 275–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Toward a Unified Grammar of Reference. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 24, 5–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Reference to individuals, person, and the variety of mapping parameters. In A. Klinge & H. Høeg Müller (Eds.), Essays on Nominal Determination: from morphology to discourse (pp. 189–211). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lord, C.
(1989) Syntactic reanalysis in the historical development of serial verb constructions in languages of West Africa, PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
(1993) Historical Change in Serial Verb Constructions. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorusso, P., & Franco, L.
(2017) Patterns of syntactic agreement with embedded NPs. Lingua, 195, 39–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lovestrand, J.
(2017) Temporal iconicity and verb order in instrumental SVCs. Hand-out of a talk given at SLE, 10 September 2017.Google Scholar
(2018) Serial verb constructions in Barayin: Typology, description and Lexical­Functional Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Oxford.
Ludwig, R.
(1996) Kreolsprachen zwischen Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit. Zur Syntax und Pragmatik atlantischer Kreolsprachen auf französischer Basis. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
(2011) The coding of spatial relations with human landmarks: From Latin to Romance. In S. Kittilä, K. Västi, & J. Ylikoski (Eds.), Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles (pp. 209–234). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
(1967) A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences. Foundations of Language, 3, 390–396.Google Scholar
McGinnis, M.
(1998) Locality in A-movement. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Malchukov, A.
(2008) Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua, 118(2), 203–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R., & Wexler, K.
(1987) Parameters, Binding Theory, and Learnability. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 413–444.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. R., & Savoia L. M.
(2002) Parameters of subject inflection in Italian dialects. In P. Svenonius (Eds.), Subjects, Expletives and the EPP (pp. 157–199). New York, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa (3 volumes) Alessandria, Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
(2007) A unification of morphology and syntax. Studies in Romance and Albanian varieties. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
(2011a) Grammatical categories. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R.
(2014) Grammatical categories: Strong and weak pronouns in RomanceLingua, 150, 171–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R. & Savoia, L. M.
(2014) From Latin to Romance: case loss and preservation in pronominal systemsProbus, 26(2), 217-248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R., Savoia, L. M., & Franco, L.
(2015) Ergative case, Aspect and Person splits: Two case studies. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 62(3), 297–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R., & Franco, L.
(2016) Goal and DOM datives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 34, 197–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R.
(2017) Passive, smuggling and the by-phrase. In N. LaCara, K. Moulton & A-M. Tessier (Eds.), A Schrift to Fest Kyle Johnson (pp. 233–244). University of Massachusets – Amherst.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. R., & Savoia L. M.
(2017a) N morphology and its interpretation: The neuter in Italian and Albanian varieties. In A. Bloch-Rozmej & A. Bondaruk (Eds.), Constraints on Structure and Derivation in Syntax, Phonology and Morphology (pp. 213–236). Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2017b) Gender, number and inflectional class in Romance: Feminine/plural –a. In J. Emonds & M. Janebova (Eds.), Language Use and Linguistic Structure (pp. 263–282). Olomouc, Palacky University Olomouc.Google Scholar
(2018) The Morphosyntax of Albanian and Aromanian Varieties. Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R., & Franco, L.
(2019) ‘Agreement of structural obliques’ parameter. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 42(1), 82–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R., Franco, L., & Savoia, L. M.
(2019) Suffixaufnahme, Oblique Case and Agree. In L. Franco, M. Marchis Moreno, & M. Reeve (Eds.), Agreement, Case and Locality in the Nominal and Verbal Domains (pp. 211–255). Berlin, Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. R., Savoia, L. M., & Franco, L.
(2020) DOM and Dative in Italo-Romance. In A. Bárány & L. Kalin (Eds.), Case, agreement, and their interactions: New perspectives on Differential Object Marking, Berlin, De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R.
(2020) The morphosyntactic structure of number in Italian and Albanian. High and low plurals. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 19, 127–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, A.
(1984) On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1993) Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In S. Mchombo (Ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar (pp. 113–150). Stanford, CA, CSLI.Google Scholar
(1997) No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In A. Dimitriadis (Ed.), UPenn working papers in linguistics, vol. 4.2 (pp. 201–225). Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
(2007) Phases and words. In S. H. Choe (Ed.), Phases in the Theory of Grammar (pp. 191–222). Seul, Dong-In Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Marchis Moreno, M.
(2010) Relational adjectives at the Syntax/Morphology Interface in Romanian and Spanish. PhD Dissertation, Stuttgart University.Google Scholar
(2015) Relational adjectives at interfaces. Studia Linguistica, 69(3), 304–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Relational Adjectives in Romance and English Mismatches at Interfaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchis Moreno, M., & Franco, L.
(2020) Intervention in agreement and case assignment: the role of doubling. Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali – QULSO 6, 125–159.Google Scholar
Markey, T. L.
(1982) Afrikaans: Creole or Non-Creole? Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 49(2), 169–207.Google Scholar
Marten, L.
(2002) At the Syntax-Pragmatics Interface. Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masi, S.
(2020) Variation in the Possession of kinship terms in the Dialects of Italy. Proceedings of the 2020 CLA – Canadian Linguistic Association meeting.Google Scholar
Mathieu, E.
(2012) Flavors of division. Linguistic Inquiry, 43, 650–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, J. A.
(1991) Areal and universal dimensions of grammatization in Lahu. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 2 (pp. 383–453). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matushansky, O.
(2009) On the linguistic complexity of proper names. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, 573–627. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maurer, P.
(1995) L’angolar. Un créole afro-portugais parlé à São Tomé. Notes de grammaire, textes, vocabulaire. Hamburg, Buske.Google Scholar
(2009) Principense. Grammar, texts, and vocabulary of the Afro-Portuguese Creole of the Island of Príncipe, Gulf of Guinea. London/Colombo, Battlebridge.Google Scholar
(2011) The former Portuguese Creole of Batavia and Tugu (Indonesia). London/Colombo, Battlebridge.Google Scholar
(2013) Angolar structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Mazzoli, M.
(2015) Complexity in gradience: the serial verb take in Nigerian Pidgin. In A. D. M. Smith, G. Trousdale & R. Waltereit (Eds.), New Directions in Grammaticalization Research (pp. 231–260). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, B. J.
(2013) Toward an integrated typology of causative/applicative syncretism. Hand-out of a talk given at Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany, October 9, 2013.Google Scholar
McNally, L.
(1992) An interpretation for the English existential construction. New York, Garland.Google Scholar
McNally, L., & Boleda, G.
(2004) Relational adjectives as properties of kinds. In O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr (Eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics vol. 5 (pp. 179–196). [URL]Google Scholar
McNally, L.
(2011) Existential sentences. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, vol. 2 (pp. 1829–1848). Berlin, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H.
(2005) Defining Creole. New York, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, J. H.
(2011) Tying up Loose Ends: The Creole Prototype after all. Diachronica, 28(1), 82–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merlini Barbaresi, L.
(2004) Alterazione. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 264–292). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W.
(1911) Romanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg, C. Winter. Available online at: [URL].Google Scholar
Michaelis, S. M., & Haspelmath, M.
(2003) Ditransitive constructions: Creole languages in a cross-linguistic perspective. Creolica [URL]Google Scholar
Michaelis, S. M., & Marcel, R.
(2013) Seychelles Creole. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. II: Portuguese-based, Spanish-based and French-based languages (pp. 261–270). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michaelis, S. M., Maurer, P., Haspelmath, M. & Huber M.
(Eds.) (2013) Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]Google Scholar
Milsark, G. L.
(1974) Existential Sentences in English. PhD Dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar
Montaut, A.
(2004) Oblique main arguments in Hindi as localizing predications. Questioning the category of subject. In P. Bhaskararao & K. V. Subbarao (Eds.), Non nominative subjects (pp. 33–56). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moro, A.
(1997) The Raising of Predicates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Existential Sentences and Expletive There. In M. Everaert & H. C. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition (pp. 1483-1508). Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Moyne, J.
(1974) The so-called Passive in Persian. Foundation of Language, 12, 249–267.Google Scholar
Müller, G.
(2007) Notes on Paradigm Economy. Morphology, 17(1), 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, P.
(2000) The Leaky Grammar of the Chickasaw Applicatives. Chicago Linguistic Society, 36, 285–310.Google Scholar
Muysken, P.
(1981) Halfway between Quechua and Spanish: The case for relexification. In A. Highfield & A. Valdman (Eds.), Historicity and variation in creole studies (pp. 52–78). Ann Arbor, Karoma.Google Scholar
(1988) Parameters for serial verbs. In V. Manfredi (Ed.), Niger-Congo Syntax and Semantics, 1, 65–75. Boston, Boston University African Studies Center.Google Scholar
Muysken, P., & Veenstra, T.
(1995) Serial verb constructions. In J. Arends, P. Muysken & N. Smith (Eds.), Pidgins and creoles: an introduction (pp. 289–301). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P.
(1999) Three processes of borrowing: Borrowability revisited. In G. Extra & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Bilingualism and Migration (pp. 229–246). Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P., & Veenstra, T.
(2006) Serial verbs. In M. Everaert & H. C. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV (pp. 234–270). Malden, Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myler, N.
(2014) Building and Interpreting Possession Sentences. PhD Dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
(2016) Building and Interpreting Possession Sentences. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naderi, N.
(2010) Semantic and Pragmatics of Grammatical Voice in Farsi. MA Thesis, Leiden, Leiden University Center for Linguistics (LUCL).Google Scholar
Næss, Å.
(2008) Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nemati, F.
(2013) On the syntax-semantics of passives in Persian. In A. Alexiadou, & F. Schäfer, (Eds.), Non-Canonical Passives (pp. 261–280). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J.
(1986) Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language, 62, 56–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, I.
(1999) Ostyak. München, Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
(2014) A Grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin, De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, I., & Spencer, A.
(2013) Possession and modification: A perspective from Canonical Typology. In D. Brown, M. Chumakina, & G. Corbett (Eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax (pp. 207–238). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nishina, Y.
(2001) Comitative and Instrumental in Japanese. STUF-Language Typology and Universals, 54, 346–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, R.
(2019) From body part to applicative: Encoding ‘source’ in Murrinhpatha. Linguistic Typology, 23(3), 401–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noyer, R.
(1992) Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ott, D.
(2011) Diminutive-formation in German. Spelling out the Classifier Analysis. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 14, 1–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oyelaran, O.
(1982) On the scope of the serial verb construction in Yoruba. Studies in African Linguistics, 13(2), 109-146.Google Scholar
Palancar, E.
(2002) The Origin of Agent Markers. Berlin, Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, D.
(2004) The passive in Persian. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics, 13, 221–235.Google Scholar
Pantcheva, M.
(2006) Persian Preposition Classes. Nordlyd, 33, 1–25.Google Scholar
(2010) The syntactic structure of Locations, Goals, and Sources. Linguistics, 48, 1043–1081. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Decomposing Path: The Nanosyntax of Directional Expressions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Parsons, T.
1979An Analysis of Mass Terms and Amount Terms. In F. J. Pelletier (Ed.), Mass terms: some philosophical problems (pp. 137–166). Dordrecht, Springer.Google Scholar
Partee, B. H.
(2007) Compositionality and Coercion in Semantics: The Dynamics of Adjective Meaning. In G. Bouma, I. Kramer, & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation (pp. 145–161). Amsterdam, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Peck, S. M. Jr.
(1988) Tense, aspect and mood in Guinea-Casamance Portuguese Creole. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Percus, O.
(2011) Gender features and interpretation: a case study. Morphology, 21, 167–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D.
(1995) Zero syntax. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, D.
(2007) Applicative constructions. Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfänder, S.
(2013) Guyanais structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Pham, M.
(2011) Are Vietnamese kinship terms pronouns? Ms. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Pineda, A.
(2014) (In)transitivity borders. A study of applicatives in Romance languages and Basque. PhD Dissertation, UAB.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans
. (1995) (Re-)Introducing Suffixaufnahme. In F. Plank (Ed.), Double Case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme (pp. 3–112). Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Post, M.
(1995) Fa d’Ambu. In J. Arends, P. Muysken, & N. Smith (Eds.), Pidgins and creoles: an introduction (pp. 191–204). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Crioulos de Base Portuguesa. Lisboa, Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, FLUL.Google Scholar
(2013) Fa d’Ambô structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, L.
(2002) Introducing arguments. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
(2008) Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA, MIT press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rainer, F.
(1996) Copernicano e luterano: sul ruolo del latino nella derivazione deantroponimica italiana. Lingua Nostra, 57, 48–49.Google Scholar
Quine, W.
(1960). Word and object: An inquiry into the linguistic mechanisms of objective reference. John Wiley.Google Scholar
Rainer, F.
(2004) Etnici. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 402–408). Tübingen, Niemeyer.Google Scholar
(2013) Can relational adjectives really express any relation? An onomasiological perspective. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 101, 12–40.Google Scholar
Ramchand, G.
(2011) Licensing of Instrumental Case in Hindi/Urdu Causatives. Nordlyd, 36, 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T.
(2003) The theta-system – an overview. Theoretical Linguistics, 28, 229–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricca, D.
(2004) Conversione in avverbi. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 550–553). Tübingen, Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Richards, N.
(2013) Lardil ‘‘Case Stacking’’ and the Timing of Case Assignment. Syntax, 16, 42–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Uttering trees. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rickford, J. R.
(1987) Dimensions of a creole continuum: History, texts, and linguistic analysis of Guyanese Creole. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Riese, T.
(2001) Vogul. München, Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Rigau, G.
(1997) Locative sentences and related constructions in Catalan: “ésser/haver” alternation. In A. Mendikoetxea & M. Uribe-Etxebarría (Eds.), Theoretical Issues at the Morphology- Syntax Interface (pp. 395–421). Bilbao, Universidad del País Vasco.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1978) A Restructuring Rule in Italian Syntax. In S. J. Keyser (Ed.), Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages (pp. 113–158). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1988) Il sintagma preposizionale. In L. Renzi, G. P. Salvi, & A. Cardinaletti (Eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione (pp. 507–531). Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L., & Cinque, G.
(2016) Functional Categories and Syntactic Theory. The Annual Review of Linguistics, 2, 139–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, S. J., & Bresnan, J.
(2008) Retained inflectional morphology in pidgins: A typological study. Linguistic Typology, 12(2), 269–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, G.
(1969) Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, III. Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Torino, Einaudi.Google Scholar
(1968). Grammatica Storica Della Lingua Italiana e dei Suoi Dialetti. Morfologia. Torino, Einaudi.Google Scholar
Romaine, S.
(1988) Pidgin and creole languages. London & New York, Longman.Google Scholar
Romeu, J.
(2013) The nanosyntax of Path. Ms. Madrid.Google Scholar
Ross, J.
(1967) Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Roy, I.
(2006) Body part nouns in expressions of location in French. Nordlyd, 33, 98–119.Google Scholar
Roy, I., & Svenonius, P.
(2009) Complex prepositions. In F. Jacques, E. Gilbert, C. Guimier, & M. Krause (Eds.), Autour de la préposition, Actes du Colloque International de Caen (20–22 septembre 2007) (pp 105–116). Caen, Presses Universitaires de Caen.Google Scholar
Rugna, G., & Franco, L.
(2022) Prepositions as relators in Italian Prepositional Compounds. In M. Bril, M. Coene, T. Ihsane, P. Sleeman & T. Westveer (Eds.), RLLT 19, Special Issue of Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics, 8(5), 11, 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Safir, K.
(1983) Small clauses as constituents. Linguistic Inquiry, 14(4), 730–735.Google Scholar
Samiian, V.
(1983) Structure of phrasal categories in Persian: An X-bar analysis. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation.Google Scholar
(1994) The Ezafe construction: Some implications for the theory of X-bar syntax. In M. Marashi (Ed.), Persian Studies in North America (pp. 17–41). Bethesda, MD, Iranbooks.Google Scholar
Savoia, L. M., Manzini, M. R., Franco, L., & Baldi, B.
(2017) Nominal evaluative suffixes in Italian. In R. D’Alessandro, G. Iannàccaro, D. Passino, & A. M. Thornton (Eds.), Di tutti i colori. Studi linguistici per Maria Grossmann,. avalable at Leiden University Repository: [URL]Google Scholar
Savoia, L. M., Manzini, M. R., Baldi, B., & Franco, L.
(2018) A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Evaluatives in Italian. SILTA – Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata, XLVI, 413–440.Google Scholar
Scalise, S.
(1990) Constraints on the Italian suffix –mente. In W. U. Dressler, H. C. Luschützky, O. E. Pfeiffer, & J. R. Rennison (Eds.), Contemporary morphology (pp. 87–98). Mouton De Gruyter, Berlin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, F.
(2012) Two types of external argument licensing – the case of causers. Studia Linguistica, 66, 128–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlücker, B. & Ackermann, T.
(2017) The morphosyntax of proper names: an overview. Folia Linguistica, 51, 309–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumann, C. L.
(1783) Neger-Englisches Wörterbuch. Ms. Early creole lexicography: A study of C.L. Schumann’s manuscript dictionary of Sranan, ed. by A. Kamp, 44–305.Google Scholar
Schwegler, A.
(2013) Palenquero structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Seidl, C.
(2004) Deantroponimici. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 411–419). Tübingen, Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Serianni, L.
(1988) Grammatica italiana. Italiano comune e lingua letteraria. Suoni, forme, costrutti. Torino, Utet.Google Scholar
Seuren, P.
(1990) Still no serials in Seselwa: a reply to “Seselwa serialization and its significance.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 5, 271–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, M. & Pardeshi, P.
(2002) The causative continuum. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation (pp. 85–126). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, A.
(1984) The Passive: a comparative linguistic analysis. London, Croon Helm.Google Scholar
Siloni, T.
(1997) Noun Phrases and Nominalizations: The Syntax of DPs. Kluwer, Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simoncsics, P.
(1998) Kamassian. In D. Abondolo (Ed.), The Uralic Languages (pp. 580–601). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siro, P.
(1964) Suomen kielen lauseoppi. Helsinki, Tietosanakirja.Google Scholar
Sneddon, J. N.
(1996) Indonesian Reference Grammar. St Leonards, NSW, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Snyder, William, & Stromswold, K.
(1997) The Structure and Acquisition of English Dative ConstructionsLinguistic Inquiry, 28(2), 281–317.Google Scholar
Spencer, A., & Nikolaeva, I.
(2017) Denominal adjectives as mixed categories. Word Structure, 10, 79–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Starke, M.
(2009) Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd, 36, 2–6.Google Scholar
(2017) Resolving (dat = acc) ≠ gen. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 2(1), 104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stassen, L.
(2009) Predicative possession. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinkrüger, P. O.
(2013) Zamboanga Chabacano structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Stewart, J. M.
(1963) Some restrictions on objects in Twi. Journal of African Languages, 2(2), 145–149.Google Scholar
Stolz, T.
(2001) To be with X is to have X: Comitatives, instrumentals, locative, and predicative possession. Linguistics, 39(2), 321–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolz, T., Levkovych, N., & Urdze, A.
(2017) Die Grammatik der Toponyme als typologisches Forschungsfeld: eine Pilotstudie. In J. Helmbrecht, D. Nübling & B. Schlücker (Eds.), Namengrammatik, 121–146. Hamburg, Buske.Google Scholar
Stolz, T., Stroh C., & Urdze, A.
(2006) On comitatives and related categories. Berlin, De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stowell, T.
(1978) What Was There Before There Was There. Proceedings of CLS, 14, 458–471.Google Scholar
Stump, G.
(2001) Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Morphological and syntactic paradigms: Arguments for a theory of paradigm linkage. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 147–180. Dordrecht, Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sulkala, H., & Karjalainen, M.
(1992) Finnish. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Sun, C.
(1996) Word order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Suñer M.
(1982) Syntax and Semantics of Spanish Presentational Sentence-Types. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Suutari, T.
(2006) Body part names and grammaticalization. In M-L. Helasvuo & L. Campbell (Eds.), Grammar from the human perspective: Case, space and person in Finnish (pp. 101–128). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, P.
(2002) Icelandic case and the structure of events. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 5(1–3), 197–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Limits on p: filling in holes vs. falling in holes. Nordlyd, 31, 431–445.Google Scholar
(2006) The emergence of axial parts. Nordlyd, 33, 1–22.Google Scholar
(2007) Adpositions, particles and the arguments they introduce. In E. Reuland, T, Bhattacharya, & G. Spathas (Eds.), Argument Structure (pp. 63–103). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Projections of P. In A. Asbury, J. Dotlačil, B. Gehrke & R. Nouwen (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P (pp. 63–84). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Spatial P in English. In G. Cinque & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs, The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6 (pp. 127–160). New York, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Structural decomposition of spatial adpositions. Presented at The Meaning of P, Universität Bochum. [URL].Google Scholar
Swolkien de Sousa, D.
(2012) The Cape Verdean Creole of São Vicente: its genesis and structure. Ph.D Dissertation, University of Coimbra.Google Scholar
Sybesma, R.
(1999) The Mandarin VP. Dordrecht, Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) The Syntax of Mauritian Creole. London, Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
(2017) French Creoles: A Comprehensive and Comparative Grammar. London, Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tai, J. H.-Y.
(1985) Temporal sequence and Chinese word order. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in Syntax (pp. 49–72). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takamine, K.
(2017) Putting Adpositions in Place. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
(1985) Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: grammatical categories and the lexicon, (pp. 57-149) Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1988) The relation of grammar to cognition. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 165–205). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Concept structuring systems, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, F.
(1940) Le suffixe Latin -aster/ -astrum. Revue des Études Anciennes, 48, 520–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Todd, L.
(1982) Cameroon. Heidelberg, Julius Groos Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Topping, D.
(1973) Chamorro reference grammar. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrego, E.
(2010) Variability in the Case Patterns of Causative Formation in Romance and Its ImplicationsLinguistic Inquiry, 41, 445–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tortora, C.
(2005) The Preposition’s Preposition in Italian: Evidence for Boundedness of Space. In R. Gess, & E. Rubin (Eds), Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics (pp. 307–327). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ursini, F-A., & Long, H.
(2018) On spatial nouns and adpositions in Mandarin. Language and Linguistics, 81, 193–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A.
(1989) Deriving Syntactic Representations in Finnish. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts/Amherst.
van der Voort, Hein
. (2004) A grammar of Kwaza. Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Hout, A., & Roeper, T.
(1998) Events and aspectual structure in derivational morphology. In H. Harley (Ed.), Papers from the UPenn/MIT roundtable on argument structure and aspect (pp. 175–200). MITWPL32.Google Scholar
van Pareren, R.
(2013) Body part terms as a semantic basis for grammaticalization: a Mordvin case study into spatial reference and beyond. Language Sciences, 36, 90–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Riemsdijk, H.
(1978) A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases. Lisse, The Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
Veenstra, T. & den Besten, H.
(1994) Fronting. In J. Arends, P. Muysken & N. Smith (Eds.), Pidgins and creoles: an introduction (pp. 303–315). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veland, R.
(2012) Le locuzioni preposizionali a(d) opera di, per opera di, per mano di in italiano contemporaneo: funzionamento sintattico e proprietà semantiche. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 128, 537–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viitso, T-R.
(1998) Estonian. In D. Abondolo (Ed.), The Uralic Languages (pp. 115–148). London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Villalba, X.
(2013) Eventive existentials in Catalan and the topic-focus articulation. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica, 25(1), 147–173.Google Scholar
Von Fintel, K.
(1994) Restrictions on quantifier domains. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussets.Google Scholar
von Heusinger, K., & Kaiser, G. A.
(2011) Affectedness and differential object marking in Spanish. Morphology, 21(3–4), 593–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, B., & Zúñiga, F.
(2006) Source-Goal (in)difference and the typology of motion events in the clause. Sprachtypologie & Universalienforschung, 59, 284–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wandruszka, U.
(2004) Aggettivi di relazione. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 382–394). Tübingen, Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Williams, E.
(1983) Against small clauses. Linguistic Inquiry, 14(2), 287–308.Google Scholar
(1984) There-insertion. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 131–153.Google Scholar
(1994) Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, M.
(2006) Why should diminutives count? In H. Broekhuis, N. Corver, Norbert, R. Huijbregts, U. Kleinhenz, & J. Koster (Eds.), Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk (pp. 669–679). Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Windfuhr, G., & Perry, J. J.
(2009) Persian and Tajik. In G. Windfuhr (Ed.), The Iranian Languages (pp. 416–444). London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Winford, D. & Migge, B.
(2008) Surinamese Creole: Morphology and syntax. In Edgar W. Schneider (Ed.), Varieties of English, Vol. 2: The Americas and the Caribbean (pp. 693–731). Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winkler, E.
2001Udmurt. München, Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Wood, J.
(2015) Icelandic Morphosyntax and Argument Structure. Dordrecht, Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, J. & Marantz, A.
(2018) The Interpretation of External Arguments. [URL]Google Scholar
Woolford, E.
(1997) Four-way Case systems: Ergative, nominative, objective, and accusative. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15, 181–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 37, 111–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamada, M.
(2010) Plurality, reciprocity, and plurality of reciprocity. PhD Dissertation, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Ylikoski J.
(2011) A Survey of the Origins of Directional Case Suffixes in European Uralic. In S. Kittilä, K. Västi, & J. Ylikoski (Eds.), Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles (pp. 235–280). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zamparelli, R.
(2000) Layers in the Determiner Phrase. New York, Garland.Google Scholar
Ziegeler, D. P.
(2000) A Possession-Based Analysis of the Ba-construction in Mandarin Chinese. Lingua, 110, 807–842. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, J.
(1995) Lexical and Functional Direction in Dutch. In M. den Dikken, & Kees Hengeveld (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, 12 (pp. 227–238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A.
(1990) What are we talking about when we talk about serial verb constructions? In B. D. Joseph & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), When Verbs Collide: Papers from the (1990) Ohio State Mini-Conference on Serial verb constructions, The Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 39, 1–13.Google Scholar