Free clitics and bound affixes
Towards a unitary analysis
This work argues in favour of a unitary theory for free clitics, such as those we find in Romance languages, and bound affixes, which are typical of Bantu languages. Using a Clitic shell framework, as in Manzini and Savoia’s recent works, I will claim that both Romance clitics and Bantu affixes are best analysed as arguments of the verb rather than agreement markers. Furthermore, I will develop a syntactic analysis of Bantu pre-root verbal affixes, which takes into due account the asymmetrical behaviour shown towards object affixation by languages like Tshiluba and Swahili (the former allowing two or more object affixes, and the latter only one). Last but not least, I will show how from an analysis of Bantu affixes in terms of clitic projection an important insight can emerge, to the effect that the asymmetry in object passivization exhibited by the two Bantu languages is simply a consequence of the asymmetry observed in object affixation.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
van der Wal, Jenneke
2022.
A Featural Typology of Bantu Agreement,
Marten, Lutz & Nancy C. Kula
2012.
Object marking and morphosyntactic variation in Bantu.
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30:2
► pp. 237 ff.
Marten, Lutz, Nancy C. Kula & Nhlanhla Thwala
2007.
Parameters of morphosyntactic variation in Bantu1.
Transactions of the Philological Society 105:3
► pp. 253 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.