Article published in:
UG and External Systems: Language, brain and computation
Edited by Anna Maria Di Sciullo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 75] 2005
► pp. 185192
Cited by

Cited by other publications

BENTEA, ANAMARIA & STEPHANIE DURRLEMAN
2018. Not committing has its advantages: facilitating children's comprehension of object filler–gap dependencies is one of them. Journal of Child Language 45:1  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
CONTEMORI, CARLA, MATTHEW CARLSON & THEODOROS MARINIS
2018. On-line processing of English which-questions by children and adults: a visual world paradigm study. Journal of Child Language 45:2  pp. 415 ff. Crossref logo
Donkers, Jantien, John C. J. Hoeks & Laurie A. Stowe
2013. D-linking or set-restriction? ProcessingWhich-questions in Dutch. Language and Cognitive Processes 28:1-2  pp. 9 ff. Crossref logo
Goodluck, Helen & Eytan Zweig
2013. Introduction: Formal vs. processing explanations of linguistic phenomena. Language and Cognitive Processes 28:1-2  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Hamann, Cornelia & Laurie Tuller
2015.  In Structures, Strategies and Beyond [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 223],  pp. 321 ff. Crossref logo
Hopp, Holger, Anja Steinlen, Christina Schelletter & Thorsten Piske
2019. Syntactic development in early foreign language learning: Effects of L1 transfer, input, and individual factors. Applied Psycholinguistics 40:05  pp. 1241 ff. Crossref logo
Omaki, Akira & Jeffrey Lidz
2015. Linking Parser Development to Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. Language Acquisition 22:2  pp. 158 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.