References
Barbiers, S.
(2005) Word order variation in three-verb clusters and the division of labour between generative linguistics and sociolinguistics. In L. Cornips & K. Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and variation. Reconciling the biological and the social (pp. 233–264). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Mulder, W., & Lamiroy, B.
(2012) Gradualness of grammaticalization in Romance. The position of French, Spanish and Italian. In K. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: new reflections (pp. 199–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, L.
(2013) Understanding interfaces: second language acquisition and native language attrition of Spanish subject realization and word order variation. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guy, G.
(2014) Linking usage and grammar: Generative phonology, exemplar theory, and variable rules. Lingua, 1421, 57–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guy, G., & Boberg, C.
(1997) The obligatory contour principle and sociolinguistic variation. Language Variation and Change, 9(2), 149–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C., McDermott, L., & Schmid, M. S.
(2011) Changing syntactic preferences in L1 attriters of German. Paper presented at ISB 8 , Oslo, June 2011.
Kim, K., O’Grady, W., & Schwartz, B. D.
(2017) Case in heritage Korean. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1975) What is a linguistic fact? Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., Ash, S., Ravindranath, M., Weldon, T., Baranowski, M., & Nagy, N.
(2011) Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(4), 431–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levon, E., & Buchstaller, I.
(2015) Perception, cognition, and linguistic structure: The effect of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing. Language Variation and Change, 27(3), 319–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, N.
(2011) A Multilingual corpus to explore variation in language contact situations. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 431, 65–84.Google Scholar
(2015) A sociolinguistic view of null subjects and VOT in Toronto heritage languages. Lingua, 164B1, 309–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Heritage languages as new dialects. In M. Côté, R. Knooihuizen & J. Nerbonne (Eds.), The Future of Dialects: Selected papers from Methods in Dialectology XV (pp. 15–34). Berlin: Language Science.Google Scholar
Nagy, N., Chociej, J., & Hoffman, M.
(2014) Analyzing Ethnic Orientation in the quantitative sociolinguistic paradigm. Language and Communication: New perspectives on the concept of ethnic identity in North America, 351, 9–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, M., & Köpke, B.
(2017) The relevance of first language attrition to theories of bilingual development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7(6), 637–667. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S. G.
(2007) Language contact and deliberate change. Journal of Language Contact, 1(1), 41–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tse, H.
(2016) Contact-induced splits in Toronto Heritage Cantonese mid-vowels. Linguistica Atlantica, 35(2), 133–155.Google Scholar