Commentary published In:
Epistemological issue with keynote article “Pinning down of “interface” in bilingualism” by Antonella Sorace[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1:1] 2011
► pp. 89–93
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1:1] 2011
► pp. 89–93
Commentary
Which features are at the syntax–pragmatics interface?
References (11)
Belletti, A. (2004). Aspects of the low IP area. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 21 (pp. 16–51). Oxford: OUP.
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A. (2007). Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 251, 657–689. 
Hawkins, R., & Hattori, H. (2006). Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research, 221, 269–301.
Ivanov, I. (2009). Second language acquisition of Bulgarian object clitics: A test case for the interface hypothesis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa.
López, L. (2009). A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: OUP.
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax (pp. 281–337). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rothman, J. (2009). Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences? L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax–pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 411, 951–973.
Tsimpli, I.M., & Dimitrakopoulou, M. (2007). The Interpretability Hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 231, 215–242.
Tsimpli, I.M., & Sorace, A. (2006). Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax–semantics and syntax–discourse phenomena. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, BUCLD 30 (pp. 653–664). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (1996). Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research, 121, 7–39.
. (1994). Direct access to X-bar-theory. Evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In T. Hoekstra, & B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 265–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Tsiplakou, Stavroula
2024. Chapter 7. Little words, small moves. In The Continuity of Linguistic Change [Studies in Language Variation, 31], ► pp. 140 ff. 
Hoot, Bradley & Tania Leal
2023. Resilience and vulnerability of discourse-conditioned word order in heritage Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics 44:5 ► pp. 668 ff.
Leal, Tania & Bradley Hoot
2022. L2 representation and processing of Spanish focus. Language Acquisition 29:4 ► pp. 410 ff.
KÜÇÜKSAKARYA, Esra
2020. DİLBİLGİSİNİN TEMEL BİLEŞENLERİ VE ARAKESİTLER. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 22:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Leal, Tania, Emilie Destruel & Bradley Hoot
2019. The acquisition of Focus in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research 35:4 ► pp. 449 ff.
Özçelik, Öner
2018. Interface Hypothesis and the L2 acquisition of quantificational scope at the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface. Language Acquisition 25:2 ► pp. 213 ff.
Hoot, Bradley
2017. Narrow presentational focus in heritage Spanish and the syntax‒discourse interface. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.