Cover not available
Article published In:
Internal and External Factors in Child Second Language Acquisition
Edited by Aafke Hulk and Theodoros Marinis
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1:3] 2011
► pp. 265–290

The production and processing of determiner–noun agreement in child L2 Dutch

 | University of Amsterdam
 | University of Amsterdam
Recent research has shown that children who learn Dutch as their second language (L2) have difficulties with Dutch grammatical gender. This study shows that six to nine year old L2 Dutch children whose first language (L1) is Turkish noticed incorrect gender agreement between determiner and noun only if gender was marked on the noun. The L1 Turkish L2 Dutch children made more errors with determiner-noun agreement than monolingual L1 controls with matching language abilities. Unlike monolingual controls, L2 children’s accuracy with determiner-noun agreement was not facilitated by word frequency and vocabulary size. Children in both groups made fewer errors with neuter nouns if a cue on the noun marked a noun’s gender. We conclude that there is an asymmetry between L2 children’s processing and production of determiner-noun agreement, that grammatical gender develops gradually and that L2 children’s delay is rather caused by external factors related to a heterogeneous language environment than by internal factors.
Keywords: grammatical gender, child L2 acquisition, determiner-noun agreement, language environment, sentence completion, self-paced listening
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Production problems or representational deficits?
    • 1.2The role of language environment
    • 1.3Research questions
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Nouns
    • 2.3Procedures
      • 2.3.1Production
      • 2.3.2Processing
      • 2.3.3Statistical procedures
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Production
    • 3.2Processing
    • 3.3Summary
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Speech production errors and underlying knowledge
    • 4.2The role of language environment
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 July 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.3.03blo
References (46)
References
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, E., Paradis, J. & Sorenson-Duncan, T. (in press). Effects of input properties, vocabulary size and L1 on the development of third person singular –s in child L2 English. Language Learning.
Blom, E ., Polišenská, D., & Weerman, F. (2008). Articles, adjectives and age of onset: the acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender. Second Language Research, 24(3), 289–323.Google Scholar
Brouwer, S., Cornips, L., & Hulk, A. (2008). Misrepresentation of Dutch neuter gender in older bilingual children? In E. Gavruseva & B. Haznedar (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: a generative perspective (pp. 83–96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J., & White, L. (2002). The second language acquisition of Spanish DPs: the status of grammatical features. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux & J. Munoz Liveras (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax (pp. 153–178). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S.E. (1999). Putting ‘input’ in its proper place. Second Language Research, 151, 337–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L., & Hulk, A. (2008). Factors of success and failure in the acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch. Second Language Research, 24(3), 267–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durieux, G., Daelemans, W., & Gillis, S. (1999). On the arbitrariness of lexical categories. In F. van Eynde, I. Schuurman & N. Schelkens (Eds.), Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands 1998 (pp. 19–36). Rodopi, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
El-Aissati, E., Boumans, L., Cornips, L., Dorleijn, M., & Nortier, J. (2005). Turks-en Marokkaans-Nederlands. In N. van der Sijs (Ed.), Wereld-nederlands. Oude en jonge variëteiten van het Nederlands (pp. 149–185). Den Haag: SDU.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M. (2007). Miami and North Wales, so far and yet so near: Constructivist account of morpho-syntactic development in bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(3), 224–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guillelmon, D., & Grosjean, F. (2001). The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: the case of bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 291, 503–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., De Rooij, J., & Van den Toorn, M. C. (1997). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Tweede geheel herziene druk. Groningen/Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff/Wolters Plantyn.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Franceschina, F. (2004). Explaining the acquisition of and non-acquisition of determiner-noun gender concord in French and Spanish. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts. Focus on functional categories (pp. 175–205). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B. (2001). The acquisition of the IP system in child L2 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 231, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E., & Naigles, L. (2002). How children use input to acquire a lexicon. Child Development, 731, 418–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., & Wexler, K. (2002). Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘s’? Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child L2-English learners. Second Language Research,18(2), 95–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (2009). A dynamic view of usage and language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3), 627–640. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, G. (2000). Turkish grammar. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marinis, T. (2010). Using on-line processing methods in language acquisition research. In E. Blom & S. Unsworth (Eds). Experimental methods in language acquistion research (pp. 139–162). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marinis, T., Blom, E., Chondrogianni, V., & Vasić, N. (2010, November) Production of gender and processing of gender mismatch in Dutch and Greek sequential bilingual children. Paper presented at the colloquium Child Bilingualism: Bilingual first language acquisition or child second language acquisition?. Meertens Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands .Google Scholar
Meisel, J. (2009). Target article: Second language acquisition in early childhood. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 281, 5–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mintz, T. (2003). Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition, 901, 91–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiňán, S. (2008). Spanish gender agreement. Language Learning, 58(3), 503–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mobaraki, M., Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (2008). The status of subjects in early child L2 English. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in Child Second Language Acquisition (pp. 209–236). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nortier, J., & Dorleijn, M. (2008). A Moroccan accent in Dutch: a sociocultural style restricted to the Moroccan community? International Journal of Bilingualism, 12(1–2), 125–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., & Genesee, F. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or interdependent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 181, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Rice, M., Crago, M., & Marquis, J. (2008). The acquisition of tense in English: Distinguishing child second language from first language and specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 291, 689–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polišenská, D. (2010). Dutch children’s acquisition of verbal and adjectival inflection. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam <http://www.lotpublications.nl/publish/issues/Polisenska/index.html>.
Prévost, P. (2003). Truncation and missing surface inflection in initial L2 German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 251, 65–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sabourin, L., Stowe, L.A., & de Haan, G.J. (2006). Transfer effects in learning an L2 grammatical gender system. Second Language Research, 27(1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheele, A., Leseman, P., & Mayo, A. (2010). The home language environment of monolingual and bilingual children and their language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 311, 117–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlichting, L., & Lutje Spelberg, H. (2002). Lexilijst NL. Amsterdam: Pearson Assessment and Information BV.Google Scholar
Snow, C., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: evidence from second-language learning. Child Development, 491, 1114–1128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trommelen, M., & Zonneveld, W. (1986). Dutch morphology: Evidence for the Right-hand Head Rule. Linguistic Inquiry, 17(1), 147–169.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2008). Age and input in the acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch. Second Language Research, 24(3), 365–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (2010). All acquisition begins with the projection of a bare verb phrase. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(2), 332–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Beurden, L., & Nijen Twilhaar, J. (1990). Hermafrodiete nomina en de verwerving van het genussysteem. De Nieuwe Taalgids, 83(3), 193–211.Google Scholar
Van der Velde, M. (2003). Déterminants et pronoms en néerlandais et en français: syntaxe et acquisition. Thèse de doctorat Paris 8 <http://umr7023.free.fr>Google Scholar
. (2004). L’acquisition des déterminants en L1: Une étude comparative entre le français et le néerlandais. Acquisition en Interaction en Langue Etrangère, 211, 9–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasić, N., & Blom, E. (2011). Production and processing of determiners in Turkish-Dutch L2 children. In N. Danis, K. Mesh & H. Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 616–627). Medford, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, R., & Vermeer, A. (2001). Taaltest Alle Kinderen (TAK). [Language assessment all children]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: CITO.Google Scholar
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-MacGregor, M., & Leung, Y.-K.I. (2004). Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 251, 105–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zekhnini, A., & Hulstijn, J. H. (1995). An experimental study on the learning of arbitrary and non-arbitrary gender of pseudo Dutch nouns by nonnative and native speakers of Dutch. Applied Linguistics in Articles, 531, 121–136.Google Scholar
Zink, I., & Lejaegere, M. (2002). N-CDI Woordenlijst. Acco, Leusden.Google Scholar
Cited by (21)

Cited by 21 other publications

Terziyan, Treysi
2024. Turkish spelling errors by Turkish-Dutch bilingual children. Ampersand 13 ► pp. 100197 ff. DOI logo
van Dijk, Chantal, Jasmijn Bosch & Sharon Unsworth
2024. Language processing in bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:4 ► pp. 435 ff. DOI logo
Altman, Carmit, Efrat Harel, Natalia Meir, Peri Iluz-Cohen, Joel Walters & Sharon Armon-Lotem
2022. Using a monolingual screening test for assessing bilingual children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 36:12 ► pp. 1132 ff. DOI logo
Spino, LeAnne
2022. Chapter 8. Investigating grammatical gender agreement in Spanish. In The Acquisition of Gender [Studies in Bilingualism, 63], ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Antonijević-Elliott, Stanislava, Ruth Durham & Íde Ní Chonghaile
2021. Language performance of sequential bilinguals on an Irish and English sentence repetition task. In Language Impairment in Multilingual Settings [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 29], ► pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Hinskens, Frans, Roeland van Hout, Pieter Muysken & Ariën van Wijngaarden
2021. Variation and change in grammatical gender marking: the case of Dutch ethnolects. Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Rodina, Yulia, Tanja Kupisch, Natalia Meir, Natalia Mitrofanova, Olga Urek & Marit Westergaard
2020. Internal and External Factors in Heritage Language Acquisition: Evidence From Heritage Russian in Israel, Germany, Norway, Latvia and the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Education 5 DOI logo
Tribushinina, Elena, Julia Lomako, Natalia Gagarina, Ekaterina Abrosova & Pim Mak
2020. Processing of pronoun gender by Dutch-Russian simultaneous bilinguals. In Typical and Impaired Processing in Morphosyntax [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 64], ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Antonijevic, Stanislava, Ruth Durham & Íde Ní Chonghaile
2017. Language performance of sequential bilinguals on an Irish and English sentence repetition task. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7:3-4 ► pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Brouwer, Susanne, Simone Sprenger & Sharon Unsworth
2017. Processing grammatical gender in Dutch: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 159 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Blom, Elma & Nada Vasić
2016. The influence of phonological factors on the expression of finiteness by children learning Dutch as their first and second language. In Finiteness Matters [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 231], ► pp. 287 ff. DOI logo
Chondrogianni, Vicky & Theodoros Marinis
2016. L2 children do not fluctuate. In The Acquisition of Turkish in Childhood [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 20], ► pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Eide, Kristin Melum
2016. Introduction. In Finiteness Matters [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 231], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Meir, Natalia, Joel Walters & Sharon Armon-Lotem
2016. Disentangling SLI and bilingualism using sentence repetition tasks: the impact of L1 and L2 properties. International Journal of Bilingualism 20:4 ► pp. 421 ff. DOI logo
CHONDROGIANNI, VASILIKI, THEODOROS MARINIS, SUSAN EDWARDS & ELMA BLOM
2015. Production and on-line comprehension of definite articles and clitic pronouns by Greek sequential bilingual children and monolingual children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics 36:5 ► pp. 1155 ff. DOI logo
Chondrogianni, Vasiliki, Nada Vasić, Theodoros Marinis & Elma Blom
2015. Production and on-line comprehension of definiteness in English and Dutch by monolingual and sequential bilingual children. Second Language Research 31:3 ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Piai, Vitória, Ardi Roelofs & Eric Maris
2014. Oscillatory brain responses in spoken word production reflect lexical frequency and sentential constraint. Neuropsychologia 53 ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
UNSWORTH, SHARON, FROSO ARGYRI, LEONIE CORNIPS, AAFKE HULK, ANTONELLA SORACE & IANTHI TSIMPLI
2014. The role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics 35:4 ► pp. 765 ff. DOI logo
UNSWORTH, SHARON
2013. Assessing the role of current andcumulativeexposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16:1 ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Unsworth, Sharon
2013. Assessing Age of Onset Effects in (Early) Child L2 Acquisition. Language Acquisition 20:2 ► pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
Unsworth, Sharon
2014. Comparing the role of input in bilingual acquisition across domains. In Input and Experience in Bilingual Development [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 13], ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.