Cover not available
To be specified published In:
Aging and Bilingualism
Edited by Ellen Bialystok and Margot D. Sullivan
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:1/2] 2016
► pp. 64–85
Article

Individual differences in cognitive control advantages of elderly late Dutch-English bilinguals

| University of Groningen
| University of Essex

This study addresses a gap in the literature on executive function advantages among bilingual speakers by investigating a group of elderly, long-term, immersed bilinguals. Our participants are native Dutch speakers who emigrated to Australia as adults and have spent many years in that country. They are compared on a range of cognitive and linguistic measures to native Dutch and native English control groups. We argue that, due to the massive differences in the bilingual experience, group analyses may fall short of capturing the full picture. We argue instead for a more qualitative approach, which takes into account as detailed a picture of bilingual development, daily language habits and, in particular, code-switching habits as possible.

Keywords: language and aging, executive function, language attrition, late bilinguals, bilingual advantage
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The bilingual advantage
  • 3.The study
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Materials
      • Cognitive tasks
      • Language tasks
    • 3.3Data analysis
  • 4.Results
    • Step 1: quantitative group comparison
    • Step 2: qualitative individual differences examined
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.14032.kei
References
Alho, J.M.
(2008) Migration, fertility, and aging in stable populations. Demography, 45(3), 641–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E.
(2009) Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(1), 3–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Reshaping the mind: The benefits of bilingualism. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(4), 229–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., Klein, R. & Viswanathan, M.
(2004) Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and aging, 19(2), 290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. & Freedman, M.
(2007) Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia. Neuropsychologia, 45(2), 459–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, D. M. & Shafto, M. A.
(2008) Language and aging. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 373–443). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Craik, F. I., Bialystok, E. & Freedman, M.
(2010) Delaying the onset of Alzheimer disease Bilingualism as a form of cognitive reserve. Neurology, 75(19), 1726–1729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P.A.
(1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 191, 450–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bruin, A. & Della Sala, S.
(2015) The importance of language use when studying the neuroanatomical basis of bilingualism. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L.M & Dunn, D.M.
(2007) The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Fourth Edition. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson, Inc.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Schlichting, L.
(2005) Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III-NL. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pearson.Google Scholar
Festman, J. & Münte, T.F.
(2012) Cognitive control in Russian-German bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E. & McHugh, P.R.
(1975) “Mini-Mental State”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 121, 189–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. & Lee, J.
(2010) Working memory capacity, inhibitory control, and proficiency in a second language. In M.S. Schmid & Lowie, W. (Eds.), Modeling bilingualism: from structure to chaos (pp. 59–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grant, D.A. & Berg E.A.
(1948) A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 341, 404–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, D.W.
(2011) Language control in different contexts: the behavioral ecology of bilingual speakers. Frontiers in Psychology 2011(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W. & Abutalebi, J.
(2013) Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 515–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grotjahn, R.
(1987) How to construct and evaluate a C-test: A discussion of some problems and some statistical analyses. Quantitative Linguistics, 231, 219–253.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R.
(2015) Why it is pointless to ask under which specific circumstances the bilingual advantage occurs. Cortex. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heaton, R.K., Chelune, G.J., Talley, J.L., Kay, G.C. & Curtiss, G.
(1993) Wisconsin card sorting test: manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Keijzer, M.
(2007) Last in first out? An investigation of the regression hypothesis in Dutch emigrants in Anglophone Canada. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Kirk, N. W., Fiala, L., Scott-Brown, K. C. & Kempe, V.
(2014) No evidence for reduced Simon cost in elderly bilinguals and bidialectals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 640–648. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F. & Bialystok, E.
(2013) Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 251, 497–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luk, G., Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. & Grady, C. L.
(2011) Lifelong bilingualism maintains white matter integrity in older adults. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(46), 16808–16813. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S. & Frith, C. D.
(2000) Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(8), 4398–4403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oller, J.W. & Streiff, V.
(1975) Dictation: A test of grammar-based expectancies. In R.L. Jones & B. Spolsky (Eds.), Testing language proficiency (pp. 71–82). Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Polk, T. A. & Farah, M. J.
(1995) Late experience alters vision. Nature, 3761, 648–649 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, M. S. & Jarvis, S.
(2014) Lexical access and lexical diversity in first language attrition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(4), 729–748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, J. R. & Wolf, J. D.
(1963) Choice reaction time as a function of angular stimulus-response correspondence and age. Ergonomics, 6(1), 99–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A.
(2010) Using magnitude estimation in developmental linguistic research. In E. Blom & S. Unsworth (Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 57–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroop, J.R.
(1935) “Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.”Journal of Experimental Psychology, 181, 643–662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tao, L., Marzecová, A., Taft, M., Asanowicz, D. & Wodniecka, Z.
(2011) The efficiency of attentional networks in early and late bilinguals: the role of age of acquisition. Frontiers in psychology, 21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tzelgov, J., Henik, A. & Leiser, D.
(1990) Controlling Stroop interference: Evidence from a bilingual task. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 16.5, 760–771.Google Scholar
Valian, V.
(2015) Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 181, 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Noort, M.W.M.L., Bosch, P., Haverkort, M. & Hugdahl, K.
(2008) “A standard computerized version of the Reading Span Test in different languages.” European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24.1: 35–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verreyt, N., Woumans, E., Vandelanotte, D., Szmalec, A. & Duyck Verreyt, N., Woumans, E., Vandelanotte, D., Szmalec, A. & Duyck, W.
(2016) Influence of language switching on the bilingual cognitive control advantage. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 181-190 . DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wingfield, A. & Grossman, M.
(2006) Language and the aging brain: patterns of neural compensation revealed by functional brain imaging. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96(6), 2830–2839. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Armstrong, Bonnie A, Natalie Ein, Brenda I Wong, Sara N Gallant & Lingqian Li
2021. Retracted: The Effect of Bilingualism on Older Adults’ Inhibitory Control: A Meta-Analysis. The Gerontologist 61:3 ► pp. e102 ff. DOI logo
Carthery-Goulart, Maria Teresa, Adam John Privitera & Brendan Stuart Weekes
2023. Does Language Distance Modulate the Contribution of Bilingualism to Cognitive Reserve in Seniors? A Systematic Review. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias® 38 ► pp. 153331752311672 ff. DOI logo
Cox, Jessica G., Ashley LaBoda & Najee Mendes
2020. “I'm gonna Spanglish it on you”: Self-reported vs. oral production of Spanish–English codeswitching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:2 ► pp. 446 ff. DOI logo
Dash, Tanya, Yves Joanette & Ana Inés Ansaldo
2022. Multifactorial approaches to study bilingualism in the aging population: Past, present, future. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Annick De Houwer & Lourdes Ortega
2018. The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingualism, DOI logo
Giovannoli, Jasmine, Diana Martella & Maria Casagrande
2023. Executive functioning during verbal fluency tasks in bilinguals: A systematic review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders DOI logo
Johannessen, Janne Bondi & Michael T. Putnam
2020. Heritage Germanic Languages in North America. In The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics, ► pp. 783 ff. DOI logo
Ortega, Lourdes
2020. The Study of Heritage Language Development From a Bilingualism and Social Justice Perspective. Language Learning 70:S1 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Paap, Kenneth
2019. The Bilingual Advantage Debate. In The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism, ► pp. 701 ff. DOI logo
Pfenninger, Simone E. & David Singleton
2019. Starting Age Overshadowed: The Primacy of Differential Environmental and Family Support Effects on Second Language Attainment in an Instructional Context. Language Learning 69 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Pfenninger, Simone E. & David Singleton
2019. A critical review of research relating to the learning, use and effects of additional and multiple languages in later life. Language Teaching 52:4 ► pp. 419 ff. DOI logo
Poarch, Gregory J, Jan Vanhove & Raphael Berthele
2019. The effect of bidialectalism on executive function. International Journal of Bilingualism 23:2 ► pp. 612 ff. DOI logo
Putnam, Michael T., Tanja Kupisch & Diego Pascual y Cabo
2018. Chapter 12. Different situations, similar outcomes. In Bilingual Cognition and Language [Studies in Bilingualism, 54], ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Titone, Debra, Jason Gullifer, Sivaniya Subramaniapillai, Natasha Rajah & Shari Baum
2017. Chapter 13. History-inspired reflections on the Bilingual Advantages Hypothesis. In Growing Old with Two Languages [Studies in Bilingualism, 53], ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Ware, Anna T., Melissa Kirkovski & Jarrad A. G. Lum
2020. Meta-Analysis Reveals a Bilingual Advantage That Is Dependent on Task and Age. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Bilingualism, Language Development and Processing across the Lifespan [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 15], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.