Article published in:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 7:2 (2017) ► pp. 199229
Cited by

Cited by 39 other publications

Ahn, Hyunah
2021. From Interlanguage grammar to target grammar in L2 processing of definiteness as uniqueness. Second Language Research 37:1  pp. 91 ff. Crossref logo
Alemán Bañón, José & Clara Martin
2021. The role of crosslinguistic differences in second language anticipatory processing: An event-related potentials study. Neuropsychologia 155  pp. 107797 ff. Crossref logo
Armstrong, Andrew, Nyssa Bulkes & Darren Tanner
2018. QUANTIFICATIONAL CUES MODULATE THE PROCESSING OF ENGLISH SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT BY NATIVE CHINESE SPEAKERS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:4  pp. 731 ff. Crossref logo
Bañón, José Alemán, David Miller & Jason Rothman
2020. EXAMINING THE CONTRIBUTION OF MARKEDNESS TO THE L2 PROCESSING OF SPANISH PERSON AGREEMENT. Studies in Second Language Acquisition  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Brown, James Dean & Theres Grüter
2020. The same cloze for all occasions?. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
CHENG, WEI & AMIT ALMOR
2019. A Bayesian approach to establishing coreference in second language discourse: Evidence from implicit causality and consequentiality verbs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22:3  pp. 456 ff. Crossref logo
Contemori, Carla & Paola E. Dussias
2019. Prediction at the Discourse Level in Spanish–English Bilinguals: An Eye-Tracking Study. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Covey, Lauren, Alison Gabriele & Robert Fiorentino
2018. Can learners use morphosyntactic cues to facilitate processing? Evidence from a study of gender agreement in Hindi. Language Acquisition 25:3  pp. 327 ff. Crossref logo
Dekydtspotter, Laurent, Mark Black, Rodica Frimu & Amber Rae Panwitz
2018.  In Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism, 55],  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Felser, Claudia
2019. Structure-sensitive constraints in non-native sentence processing. Journal of the European Second Language Association 3:1  pp. 12 ff. Crossref logo
Foltz, Anouschka
2020. USING PROSODY TO PREDICT UPCOMING REFERENTS IN THE L1 AND THE L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Foltz, Anouschka
2021. Adaptation in Predictive Prosodic Processing in Bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Foucart, Alice
2021.  In Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 12],  pp. 92 ff. Crossref logo
Gambi, Chiara
2021.  In Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 12],  pp. 188 ff. Crossref logo
Grüter, Theres & Hannah Rohde
2021. Limits on expectation-based processing: Use of grammatical aspect for co-reference in L2. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:1  pp. 51 ff. Crossref logo
Grüter, Theres, Yanxin Alice Zhu & Carrie N. Jackson
2021.  In Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 12],  pp. 208 ff. Crossref logo
Hopp, Holger
2020. Morphosyntactic adaptation in adult L2 processing: Exposure and the processing of case and tense violations. Applied Psycholinguistics 41:3  pp. 627 ff. Crossref logo
Hopp, Holger
2021.  In Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 12],  pp. 168 ff. Crossref logo
Jackson, Carrie N. & Holger Hopp
2020. Prediction error and implicit learning in L1 and L2 syntactic priming. International Journal of Bilingualism 24:5-6  pp. 895 ff. Crossref logo
Jessen, Anna, Julia Festman, Oliver Boxell & Claudia Felser
2017. Native and Non-native Speakers’ Brain Responses to Filled Indirect Object Gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46:5  pp. 1319 ff. Crossref logo
Johnson Fowler, Courtney & Carrie N. Jackson
2017. Facilitating morphosyntactic and semantic prediction among second language speakers of German. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 29:8  pp. 883 ff. Crossref logo
Kaiser, Elsi
2020. Linguistic consequences of event segmentation in visual narratives: implications for prominence. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35:3  pp. 402 ff. Crossref logo
Kang, Hyun-Sook, Nayoung Kim & Kiel Christianson
2019. Grammatical aspect and world knowledge in second language reading . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Karaca, Figen, Susanne Brouwer, Sharon Unsworth & Falk Huettig
2021.  In Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 12],  pp. 116 ff. Crossref logo
Keating, Gregory D.
2021.  In Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction [Studies in Bilingualism, 62],  pp. 328 ff. Crossref logo
KIM, HYUNWOO & THERES GRÜTER
2019. Cross-linguistic activation of implicit causality biases in Korean learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22:3  pp. 441 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, Hyunwoo & Theres Grüter
2021. PREDICTIVE PROCESSING OF IMPLICIT CAUSALITY IN A SECOND LANGUAGE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:1  pp. 133 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, Hyunwoo, Gyu-Ho Shin & Haerim Hwang
2020. INTEGRATION OF VERBAL AND CONSTRUCTIONAL INFORMATION IN THE SECOND LANGUAGE PROCESSING OF ENGLISH DATIVE CONSTRUCTIONS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:4  pp. 825 ff. Crossref logo
Klassen, Gabrielle, Aline Ferreira & John W. Schwieter
2021. The role of immersion learning in the acquisition and processing of L2 gender agreement. Applied Linguistics Review 0:0 Crossref logo
Leal, Tania, Roumyana Slabakova & Thomas A. Farmer
2017. THE FINE-TUNING OF LINGUISTIC EXPECTATIONS OVER THE COURSE OF L2 LEARNING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:3  pp. 493 ff. Crossref logo
Mitsugi, Sanako
2020. Generating predictions based on semantic categories in a second language: A case of numeral classifiers in Japanese. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 58:3  pp. 323 ff. Crossref logo
Mitsugi, Sanako
2021. Polarity adverbs facilitate predictive processing in L2 Japanese. Second Language Research  pp. 026765832110008 ff. Crossref logo
Reuter, Tracy, Mia Sullivan & Casey Lew-Williams
2021. Look at that: Spatial deixis reveals experience-related differences in prediction. Language Acquisition  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Roberts, Leah, Jorge González Alonso, Christos Pliatsikas & Jason Rothman
2018. Evidence from neurolinguistic methodologies: Can it actually inform linguistic/language acquisition theories and translate to evidence-based applications?. Second Language Research 34:1  pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo
Rothman, Jason, Fatih Bayram, Ian Cunnings & Jorge González Alonso
2019.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning,  pp. 13 ff. Crossref logo
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019.  In Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer, Crossref logo
Rothman, Jason & Roumyana Slabakova
2018. THE GENERATIVE APPROACH TO SLA AND ITS PLACE IN MODERN SECOND LANGUAGE STUDIES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:2  pp. 417 ff. Crossref logo
Schafer, Amy J., Amber Camp, Hannah Rohde & Theres Grüter
2019.  In Grammatical Approaches to Language Processing [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 48],  pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Shirai, Yasuhiro & Alan Juffs
2017. Introduction: Convergence and divergence in functional and formal approaches to SLA. Second Language Research 33:1  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y.
(1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, M.
(1990) Accessing noun phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. E.
(2001) The effects of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference. Discourse Processes, 31, 137–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) How speakers refer: the role of accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, 187–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A.
(2003) Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakeman, R., & McArthur, D.
(1996) Picturing repeated measures: Comments on Loftus, Morrison, and others. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28, 584–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(2000) Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning and use. Oxford: Blackwell.
Barr, D.
(2013) Coding categorical variables when analyzing factorial experiments with regression. Retrieved from http://​talklab​.psy​.gla​.ac​.uk​/tvw​/catpred/Google Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A.
(2007) Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 657–689. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. D.
(1980) Relative merits of four methods for scoring cloze tests. Modern Language Journal, 64, 311–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., Grober, E., Garvey, C., & Yates, J.
(1977) Comprehension of Anaphoric Pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 16, 601–609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carminati, M. N.
(2002) The processing of Italian subject pronouns. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Chambers, C. G., & Cooke, H.
(2009) Lexical competition during second-language listening: Sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 1029–1040.Google Scholar
DeLong, K. A., Troyer, M., & Kutas, M.
(2014) Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure. Language and Linguistic Compass, 8, 631–645. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M.
(2005) Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Federmeier, K. D.
(2007) Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44, 491–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferretti, T. R., Rohde, H., Kehler, A., & Crutchley, M.
(2009) Verb aspect, event structure, and coreferential processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 191–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferstl, E. C., Garnham, A., & Manouilidou, C.
(2011) Implicit causality bias in English: a corpus of 300 verbs. Behavioral Research Methods, 43, 124–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foucart, A., Martin, C. D., Moreno, E. M., & Costa, A.
(2014) Can Bilinguals See It Coming? Word Anticipation in L2 Sentence Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1461–1469.Google Scholar
Fukumura, K., van Gompel, P. G.
(2010) Choosing anaphoric expressions: Do people take into account likelihood of reference? Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 52–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gabriele, A.
(2005) The acquisition of aspect in a second language: A bidirectional study of learners of English and Japanese. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). City University of New York Graduate Center.Google Scholar
(2009) Transfer and transition in the SLA of aspect: A bidirectional study of learners of English and Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 371–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gatt, A., Krahmer, E., van Deemter, K., & van Gompel, R. P. G.
(2014) Models and empirical data for the production of referring expressions. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Special Issue on the Production of Referring Expressions: Models and Empirical Data, 29, 899–911.Google Scholar
Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S.
(1995) Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21, 203–225.Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R.
(1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, J. R.
(1979) Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science, 3, 67–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2009) The syntax-discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and online performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 463–483.Google Scholar
Hwang, M. O.
(1983) Topic continuity/discontinuity in Korean narrative. Korean Linguistics, 3, 47–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. F.
(2008) Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E.
(2014) Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4, 257–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E., Dallas, A., & Wijnen, F.
(2010) Syntactic predictions in second-language sentence processing. In J.-W. Zwart & M. de Vries (Eds.), Structure preserved. Festschrift in the honor of Jan Koster (pp. 207–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, E.
(2011) Focusing on pronouns: Consequences of subjecthood, pronominalisation, and contrastive focus. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 1625–1666. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kehler, A.
(2002) Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kehler, A., Hayes, E., & Barner, D.
(2011) Pragmatically-driven biases in children’s pronoun interpretation. Poster presented at the 24th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Kehler, A., Kertz, L., Rohde, H., & Elman, J. L.
(2008) Coherence and coreference revisited. Journal of Semantics, 25, 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kehler, A. & Rohde, H.
under review). Pronoun Interpretation in a QUD Model of Discourse.
Kilborn, K.
(1992) On-line integration of grammatical information in a second language. In Harris, R. (Ed.), Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals (pp. 337–350). Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H.
(1997) Referential choice for third persons in Korean conversation. Discourse and Cognition, 4, 121–158.Google Scholar
Kim, K., Grüter, T., & Schafer, A. J.
(2013) Effects of event-structure and topic/focus-marking on pronoun reference in Korean. Poster presented at the 26th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
Lee, E. H.
(2006) Stative progressives in Korean and English. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 695–717. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A.
(2006) Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 447–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Madden, C. J. & Zwaan, R. A.
(2003) How does verb aspect constrain event representations? Memory & Cognition, 31, 663–672. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magliano, J. P., & Schleich, M. C.
(2000) Verb aspect and situation models. Discourse Processes, 29, 83–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A.
(1988) Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8, 243–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A.
(2013) Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 574–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., Greene, S., & Ratcliff, R.
(1993) Discourse models, pronoun resolution, and the implicit causality of verbs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 1040–1052.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B.
(1987) Reading in a second language: studies with adult and child learners. In S. R. Goldman & H. T. Trueba (Eds.), Becoming literate in English as a second language (pp. 57–70). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Miltsakaki, E.
(2007) A rethink of the relationship between salience and anaphora resolution. In A. Branco (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th discourse anaphora and anaphor resolution colloquium (pp. 91–96). Lagos, Portugal: Discourse anaphora and anaphora resolution colloquium.Google Scholar
Moens, M., Steedman, M.
(1988) Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference. Computational Linguistics, 14, 15–28.Google Scholar
Obana, Y.
(2003) Anaphoric choices in Japanese fictional novels: The discourse arrangement of noun phrases, zero and third person pronouns. Text, 23, 405–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pearson
(2011) Versant English Test: test description and validation summary. Palo Alto, CA: Pearson Knowledge Technologies. (http://​www​.versanttest​.com)
Pyykkönen, P., & Järvikivi, J.
(2010) Activation and persistence of implicit causality information in spoken language comprehension. Experimental Psychology, 57, 5–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P.
(2008) Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 333–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, H., Kehler, A., & Elman, J. L.
(2006) Event structure and discourse coherence biases in pronoun interpretation. In R. Sun (Ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 617–622). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rohde, H., & Kehler, A.
(2014) Grammatical and information-structural influences on pronoun production. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 29, 912–927. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y.
(2000) The semantics of the Japanese imperfective -teiru: An integrative approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 327–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A.
(2011) Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F.
(2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R. J., Crawley, R. A., & Kleinman, D.
(1994) Thematic roles, focusing and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 519–548. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ueno, M., Kehler, A.
(2010) The interpretation of null and overt pronouns in Japanese: Grammatical and pragmatic factors. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2057–2062). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar