Article published in:
Language Impairment in Bilingual Children: State of the art 2017
Edited by Theodoros Marinis, Sharon Armon-Lotem and George Pontikas
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7:3/4] 2017
► pp. 394–430

Object Clitic production in monolingual and bilingual children with Specific Language Impairment

A comparison between elicited production and narratives

| University of Cambridge
| Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
| University of Cologne
Pronominal clitics are sensitive to both morphosyntax and discourse. Problems in clitic use could therefore stem from morphosyntactic or discourse management problems in children with SLI. Previous studies focused on 3rd person clitic use identifying morphosyntactic problems. We compare 1st with 3rd person clitic elicitation by monolingual and bilingual children with SLI to examine whether perspective-switching in the same task would affect performance. Elicited 3rd person clitics were further compared with clitic use in narratives to investigate the role of richer discourse context in clitic production. Perspective-taking was independently examined with first- and second-order Theory of Mind tasks. Bilingual were more accurate than monolingual children with SLI in 1st person clitics, in the use of unambiguous clitics in narratives and in second-order ToM reasoning. We conclude that bilingualism seems to enhance SLI children’s discourse use and perspective-taking strategies which, in turn, improve their use of clitics in context-sensitive conditions.
Keywords: object clitics, SLI, bilingualism
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The present study
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Baseline language ability and WM tasks
    • 3.3Clitic production tasks
    • 3.4ToM tasks
      • 3.4.1First-order ToM unexpected transfer task
      • 3.4.2Unexpected content task
      • 3.4.3Second-order ToM task(adapted from Astington, Pelletier, & Homer, 2002)
    • 3.5Narrative retelling task
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Baseline language ability and WM tasks
    • 4.2PPPC task
    • 4.3ToM tasks
    • 4.4Narrative retelling task
      • 4.4.1Correlations and regressions
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 September 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.15025.tsi
References
Alloway, T. P.
(2007) Automated Working Memory Assessment. London: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Altman, C., Armon-Lotem, S., Fichman, S., & Walters, J.
(2016) Macrostructure, microstructure, and mental state terms in the narratives of English – Hebrew bilingual preschool children with and without specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, Special Issue 01, 165–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andrés Roqueta, C., Adrian, J.E., Clemente, R.A., & Katsos, N.
(2013) Which are the best predictors of theory of mind delay in children with specific language impairment? International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48 (6), 726–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, L. M. & Gathercole, S. E.
(2006) Short-term and working memory in specific language impairment. International Journal of Communication Disorders, 411, 675–693. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Armon-Lotem, S.
(2010) Can bilingualism be a benefit for children with SLI? Paper presented at the Language Impairment in Monolingual and Bilingual Society (LIMoBiS) Conference, Aalborg, Denmark.
Arosio, F., Branchini, C., Forgiarini, M., Roncaglione, E., Carravieri, E., Tenca, E. & Guasti, M.T.
(2010) SLI children’s weakness in morphosyntax and pragmatics. In O. Yukio (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (pp. 57–75). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Press.Google Scholar
Astington, J. W., Pelletier, J., & Homer, B.
(2002) Theory of mind and epistemological development: The relation between children’s second-order false-belief understanding and their ability to reason about evidence. New Ideas in Psychology, 201, 131–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T. Mortimore, C., & Robertson, M.
(1997) Another advanced test of theory of mind: evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 381, 813–822. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U.
(1985) Does the autistic child have a ‘ theory of mind’? Cognition, 211, 37–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Senman, L.
(2004) Executive processes in appearance-reality tasks: The role of inhibition of attention and symbolic representation. Child Development, 75 (2), 562–579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., & Lahey, M.
(1978) Language development and language disorders. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bortolini, U., Arfé, B., Caselli, M. C., Degasperi, L., Deevy, P. & Leonard, L.
(2006) Clinical markers for specific language impairment in Italian: the contribution of clitics and non-word repetition. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41(6), 695–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., & Taylor, H. A.
(2009) When you and I share perspectives: Pronouns modulate perspective-taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science, 201, 27–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chondrogianni, V.
(2008) Comparing Child and Adult L2 acquisition of the Greek DP: Effects of age and construction. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current Trends in Child Second Language Acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 97–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., Marinis, T., Edwards, S., & Blom, E.
(2014) Production and on-line comprehension of definite articles and clitic pronouns by Greek sequential bilingual children and monolingual children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1–37. ‟ Crossref.Google Scholar
Chrysohoou, E.
(2006) Working memory contributions to young children’s listening comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Farrant, B. M., Fletcher, J., & Maybery, M. T.
(2006) Specific language impairment, theory of mind, and visual perspective taking: Evidence for simulation theory and the developmental role of language. Child Development, 771, 1842–1853. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavarró, A.
(2012) Third person clitic production and omission in Romance SLI. In P. Guijarro-Fuentes & P. Larrañaga (Eds.), Pronouns and Clitics in Early Language (pp. 79–104). De Gruyter/Mouton, Berlín/Nova York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J., Paraskevopoulos, I. N., Besevegis, E., Giannitsas, N., & Mylonas, K.
(2003) Greece. In J. Georgas, L. G. Weiss, F. J. R. van de Vijver, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), Culture and Children’s Intelligence: Cross-cultural analysis of the WISC-III (pp. 199–214). San-Diego, CA: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, P. J.
(2003) The effects of bilingualism on theory of mind development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6 (1), 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, A., Bellana, B., & Bialystok, E.
(2013) Perspective-taking ability in bilingual children: Extending advantages in executive control to spatial reasoning. Cognitive Development, 281, 41–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T.
(2005) Comprehension and production of French object clitics by child second language learners and children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 261, 363–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M.T.
(1994) Verb syntax in Italian child grammar: finite and nonfinite verbs. Language Acquisition, 31, 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, C., Ohayon, S., Dubé, S., Frauenfelder, U.H., Rizzi, L., Starke, M. & Zesiger, P.
(2003) Aspects of grammatical development in young French children with SLI. Developmental Science, 6 (2), 151–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, C., Rizzi, L., & Frauenfelder, U.
(1996) On the Acquisition of Subject and Object Clitics in French. In H. Clahsen (Eds.), Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition (pp. 309–334). Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Happé, F.
(1994) An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Development Disorders, 241, 129–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, A. M.
(2002) Theory of mind and behavior disorders in children with specific language impairment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 621, (11–B).Google Scholar
Jacobson, P. & Schwartz, R.G.
(2002) Morphology in incipient bilingual Spanish-speaking preschool children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 231, 23–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, C., Nash, L., Rigaut, C., & Gerard, C. L.
(1998) Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language Acquisition, 71, 113–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J., Miller, J., & Tallal, P.
(2001) Use of cognitive state predicates by language-impaired children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36 (3), 349–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kovács, Á. M.
(2009) Early bilingualism enhances mechanisms of false‐belief reasoning. Developmental Science, 12 (1), 48–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. B.
(1998) Children with Specific Language Impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B. & Bortolini, U.
(1998) Grammatical morphology and the role of weak syllables in the speech of Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(6), 1363–1374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U.
(1988) Autistic children’s understanding of seeing, knowing, and believing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 61, 315–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manika, S., Varlokosta, S. & Wexler, K.
(2011) The Lack of Omission of Clitics in Greek Children with SLI: An Experimental Study. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Volume 21 (pp. 429–437). Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Marinis, T.
(2000) The acquisition of clitic objects in Modern Greek: Single clitics, clitic doubling, clitic left dislocation. In A. Alexiadou, N. Fuhrop, U. Kleinhenz, & P. Law (Eds.), ZAS working papers 151 (pp. 260–283). Berlin: Humboldt University.Google Scholar
Mastropavlou, M.
(2006) The effect of phonological saliency and LF-interpretability in the grammar of Greek normally developing and language impaired children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Merritt, D. D., & Liles, B. Z.
(1987) Story grammar ability in children with and without language disorder: Story generation, story retelling, and story comprehension. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 301, 539–552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. A., Kail, R., Leonard, L. B., & Tomblin, J. B.
(2001) Speed of processing in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 441, 416–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Novogrodsky, R.
(2013) Subject pronoun use by children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 271, 85–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J.
(2004) The relevance of specific language impairment in understanding the role of transfer in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 251, 67–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Bilingual children with specific language impairment: Theoretical and applied issues. Applied Psycholinguistics, 281, 512–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., & Crago, M.
(2002) What can SLI tell us about transfer in SLA? Paper presented at the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference, Ottawa.
Paradis, J., Crago, M., & Genesee, F.
(2005/2006) Domain specific versus domain general theories of the deficit in SLI: Object pronoun acquisition by French English bilingual children. Language Acquisition, 13 (1), 33–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Crago, M., Genesee, F., & Rice, M.
(2003) Bilingual children with specific language impairment: How do they compare with their monolingual peers? Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 461, 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M., & Gopnik, M.
(1997) Compensatory strategies in genetic dysphasia: Declarative memory. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 101, 173–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A., & Leekman, S.
(1989) Exploration of the autistic child’s theory of mind: knowledge, belief, and communication. Child Development, 601, 689–700. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perner, J., Leekam, S., & Wimmer, H.
(1987) Three-year-olds’difficulty understanding false belief: Representational limitation, lack of knowledge or pragmatic misunderstanding. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 51, 125–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, C.
(2010) ‘And I was very very crying’: Children’s self-descriptions of distress as predictors of recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 241, 909–924. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Psaki, R. R., Seidman, J. C., Miller, M., Gottlieb, M., Bhutta, Z. A., Ahmed, T., Ahmed, A. M., Bessong, P., John, S. M., Kang, G., Kosek, M., Lima, A., Shrestha, P., Svensen, E., Checkley, W.
, & MAL-ED Network Investigators (2014) Measuring socioeconomic status in multicountry studies: results from the eight country MAL-ED study. Population Health Metrics, 121, Crossref.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C.
(1997) Word Finding Vocabulary Test (The Renfrew Language Scales). Oxford: Winslow Press.Google Scholar
Rumpf, A., Kamp-Becker, I., Becker, K., & Kauschke, C.
(2012) Narrative competence and "internal state language" of children with Asperger syndrome and ADHD. Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 331, 1395–1407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, J.
(1997) Direct object scrambling in Dutch and Italian child language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Schneider, P., Dubé, R. V., & Hayward, D.
(2005) The Edmonton Narrative Norms Instrument. Retrieved from University of Alberta Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine website: http://​www​.rehabresearch​.ualberta​.ca​/enni.
Schneider, P., Hayward, D., & Dubé, R. V.
(2006) Storytelling from pictures using the Edmonton Narrative Norms Instrument. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 301, 224–238.Google Scholar
Smith, N.
(2008) Morphosyntactic skills and phonological short-term memory in Greek preschool children with Specific Language Impairment. PhD Dissertation, University of Reading, Reading, UK.Google Scholar
Stavrakaki, S., Chrysomallis, M.A., & Petraki, E.
(2011) Subject-verb agreement, object clitics, and wh-questions in bilingual French-Greek SLI: The case study of a French-Greek speaking child with SLI. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 25 (5), 339–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stavrakaki, S., & Tsimpli, I. M.
(2000) Diagnostic Verbal IQ Test for Greek preschool and school age children: standardization, statistical analysis, psychometric properties. In M. Glykas & G. Kalomiris (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Symposium of the Panhellenic Association of Logopedists (pp. 95–106). Athens: Ellinika Grammata.Google Scholar
Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C.
(1979) An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Eds.), New directions in discourse processing, Vol. 2: Advances in discourse processing (pp. 53–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Terzi, A.
(2007) Achimedes I Corpus, (Prepositions in normal, early and impaired language). TEI Patras, Greece.Google Scholar
Tsakali, V., & Wexler, K.
(2003) Why do children omit clitics in some languages but not in others? In J. v. Kampen & S. Baauw (Eds.), Proceedings of the Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 493–504). Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M.
(2001) LF-interpretability and language development: A study of verbal and nominal features in normally developing and SLI Greek children. Brain and Language, 771, 432–448. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Peripheral positions in early Greek. In M. Stavrou & A. Terzi (Eds.), Advances in Greek generative syntax (pp. 179–216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M. & Mastropavlou, M.
(2007) Feature interpretability in L2 acquisition and SLI: Greek clitics and determiners. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 143–183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M., Peristeri, E., & Andreou, M.
(2013)  A study of clitic pronoun production in monolingual and bilingual children with Specific Language Impairment. Psychology, 20 (3), 302–320.Google Scholar
(2016) Narrative production in monolingual and bilingual children with Specific Language Impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 371, 195–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M., Prévost, P., Fotiadou, G., & Dimitrakopoulou, M.
in progress). Clitic production in bilingual French/Greek children.
Tsimpli, I. M., & Stavrakaki, S.
(1999) The effects of a morphosyntactic deficit in the determiner system: The case of a Greek SLI child. Lingua, 1081, 31–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L.
(2004) Specific language impairment and theory-of-mind: Is normal language development an essential precursor for on time theory-of-mind development? Unpublished manuscript, University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Tuller, L., Abboud, L., Ferré, S., Fleckstein, A., Prévost, P., dos Santos, C., Scheidnes, M., Zebib, R.
(2014) Specific Language Impairment and Bilingualism: Assembling the pieces. In C. Hamann & E. Ruigendijk (Eds.), Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of Gala 2013. Newcastle, RU, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Tuller, L., Audollent, C., Delage, H., & Monjauze, C.
(2004) Protocole expérimental de Production des Pronoms Clitiques. Laboratoire Langage et handicap. Tours, France.Google Scholar
Tuller, L., Delage, H., Monjauze, C., Piller, A.-G., & Barthez, M. A.
(2011) Clitic pronoun production as a measure of atypical language development in French. Lingua, 1211, 423–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varlokosta, S.
(2002) Functional categories in Greek specific language impairment. In C. Clairis (Eds.), Recherches en Linguistique Grecque, Volume II1 (pp. 303–306). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Vogeley, K., Bussfeld, P., Newen, A., Hermann, S., Happe, F., Falkai, P., Maier, W., Shah, N., Fink, G., & Zilles, K.
(2001) Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. NeuroImage, 141, 170–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vogindroukas, I., Protopapas, A., & Sideridis, G.
(2009) Experiment on the Expressive Vocabulary (Greek version of Renfrew Word Finding Vocabulary Test). Chania, Crete: Glafki.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D.
(1992) WISC-III: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition: Manual (Australian adaptation). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wexler, K., Gavarró, A., & Torrens, V.
(2004) Feature checking and object clitic omission in child Catalan. In R. Bok-Bennema, B. Hollebrandse, B. Kampers Mahne, & P. Sleeman (Eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory (pp. 253–268). John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Windsor, J., & Huang, M.
(1999) Testing the Generalized Slowing Hypothesis in SLI, Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 421, 1205–1218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Windsor, J., Milbrath, R. L., Carney, E. J., & Rakowski, S. E.
(2001) General slowing in language impairment: Methodological considerations in testing the hypothesis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 441, 446–461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Andreou, Maria, Eleni Peristeri & Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
2022. Reference maintenance in the narratives of Albanian–Greek and Russian–Greek children with Developmental Language Disorder: A study on crosslinguistic effects. First Language 42:2 ► pp. 292 ff. Crossref logo
Hertel, Irina, Solveig Chilla & Lina Abed Ibrahim
2021. Special Needs Assessment in Bilingual School-Age Children in Germany. Languages 7:1 ► pp. 4 ff. Crossref logo
Leivada, Evelina, Maria Kambanaros & Kleanthes K. Grohmann
2017. The Locus Preservation Hypothesis: Shared Linguistic Profiles across Developmental Disorders and the Resilient Part of the Human Language Faculty. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
MEIR, Natalia & Rama NOVOGRODSKY
2021. Referential expressions in monolingual and bilingual children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): A study of informativeness and definiteness. Journal of Child Language ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Novogrodsky, Rama & Natalia Meir
2020.  In Handbook of Early Language Education [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Novogrodsky, Rama & Natalia Meir
2022.  In Handbook of Early Language Education [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ], ► pp. 669 ff. Crossref logo
Peristeri, Eleni, Maria Andreou, Ianthi Maria Tsimpli & Stephanie Durrleman
2020.  In Developing Narrative Comprehension [Studies in Bilingualism, 61], ► pp. 298 ff. Crossref logo
Scheidnes, Maureen, Laurice Tuller & Philippe Prévost
2021. Object clitic production in French-speaking L2 children and children with SLI. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 11:2 ► pp. 259 ff. Crossref logo
Skrimpa, Vasileia, Vasilina Spanou, Christiane Bongartz, Eleni Peristeri, Maria Andreou & Despina Papadopoulou
2022. Bilingualism effects in pronoun comprehension: Evidence from children with autism. Autism Research 15:2 ► pp. 270 ff. Crossref logo
Smith, Neil & Ianthi Tsimpli
2021.  In A Companion to Chomsky, ► pp. 377 ff. Crossref logo
Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria, Eleni Peristeri & Maria Andreou
2017.  In Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism [Studies in Bilingualism, 52], ► pp. 331 ff. Crossref logo
Vender, Maria, Denis Delfitto & Chiara Melloni
2018. Clitic Production in Bilingual Children: When Exposure Matters. Languages 3:3 ► pp. 22 ff. Crossref logo
Vender, Maria, Mirta Vernice & Antonella Sorace
2021. Supporting Bilingualism in Vulnerable Populations. Sustainability 13:24 ► pp. 13830 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.