Cover not available
Article published In:
Bilingualism and Executive Function: An interdisciplinary approach
Edited by Irina A. Sekerina and Lauren Spradlin
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:5] 2016
► pp. 575–589

Executive control in bilingual children

Factors that influence the outcomes

| City University of New York

While findings on the bilingual advantage in adults are mixed, the data from children are more consistent but still show variations. A number of factors influence the outcomes, such as individual bilingual characteristics, variations in target functions, and differences in task type. Our goal is to demonstrate that there is a complex relationship among these variables and that the outcomes of executive function (EF) studies depend on the interactions among these factors. Performance on EF is influenced by children's language proficiency, language use, age, socioeconomic status, and culture. These individual features show different interactions with different executive components. Bilingual and monolingual children differ in some EFs but not in others. Variations in tasks and other measurement issues further increase the differences in the results. We may better understand the nature of the bilingual advantage in children if we combine aspects of developmental science and language processing with hypotheses about bilingualism.

Keywords: executive control, language proficiency, speed of processing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Participant characteristics and individual differences
  • 3.Differences in target functions
  • 4.Task types and measurement issues
  • 5.Summary
  • Acknowledgement
  • References
Published online: 10 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.15038.mar
References
Barac, R. & Bialystok, E.
(2012) Bilingual effects on cognitive and linguistic development: Role of language, cultural background, and education. Child Development, 83 (2), 413–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E.
(2010) Global–local and trail-making tasks by monolingual and bilingual children: Beyond inhibition. Developmental Psychology, 46 (1), 93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Feng, X.
(2009) Language proficiency and executive control in proactive interference: evidence from monolingual and bilingual children and adults. Brain and Language, 1091, 93–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Luk, G., Peets, K. F., & Yang, S.
(2010) Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13 (4), 525–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Viswanathan, M.
(2009) Components of executive control with advantages for bilingual children in two cultures. Cognition, 112 (3), 494–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bjorklund, D. F., & Harnishfeger, K. K.
(1990) The resources construct in cognitive development: Diverse sources of evidence and a theory of inefficient inhibition. Developmental Review, 10 (1), 48–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, E., Küntay, A. C., Messer, M., Verhagen, J., & Leseman, P.
(2014) The benefits of being bilingual: Working memory in bilingual Turkish-Dutch children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1281, 105–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonifacci, P., Giombini, L., Bellocchi, S., & Contento, S.
(2011) Speed of processing, anticipation, inhibition and working memory in bilinguals. Developmental Science, 14 (2), 256–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, S. M., & Meltzoff, A. N.
(2008) Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science, 11 (2), 282–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cepeda, N. J., Blackwell, K. A., & Munakata, Y.
(2013) Speed isn't everything: Complex processing speed measures mask individual differences and developmental changes in executive control. Developmental Science, 16 (2), 269–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowe, S. F.
(1998) The differential contribution of mental tracking, cognitive flexibility, visual search, and motor speed to performance on parts A and B of the Trail Making Test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54 (5), 585–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, A., Bornstein, M. H., & Putnick, D. L.
(2013) A bilingual–monolingual comparison of young children's vocabulary size: Evidence from comprehension and production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35 (6), 1189–1211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunabeitia, J. A., Hernandez, J.A., Anton, E., Macizo, P., Estevez, A., Fuentes, L. J., & Carreiras, M.
(2014) The Inhibitory Advantage in Bilingual Children Revisited Myth or Reality? Experimental Psychology, 61 (3), 234–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Forstmann, B. U., Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & Wagenmakers, E. J.
(2012) Testing theories of post-error slowing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74 (2), 454–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eichorn, N., Marton, K., Campanelli, L., & Scheuer, J.
(2014) Verbal strategies and nonverbal cues in school-age children with and without specific language impairment (SLI). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49 (5), 618–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engel de Abreu, P. M. E., Cruz-Santos, A., Tourinho, C. J., Martin, R., & Bialystok, E.
(2012) Bilingualism enriches the poor enhanced cognitive control in low-income minority children. Psychological Science, 23 (11), 1364–1371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esposito, A. G. Baker-Ward, L., & Mueller, S. T.
(2013) Interference suppression vs. response inhibition: An explanation for the absence of a bilingual advantage in preschoolers’ Stroop task performance. Cognitive Development, 28 (4), 354–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filippi, R., Morris, J., Richardson, F. M., Bright, P., Thomas, M. S., Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Marian, V.
(2014) Bilingual children show an advantage in controlling verbal interference during spoken language comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (3), 490–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A.
(2004) The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133 (1), 101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W., & Abutalebi, J.
(2013) Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25 (5), 515–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R.
(1995) Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Hoff, E.
(2006) How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review 261, 55–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E., Core, C., Place, S., Rumiche, R., Señor, M., & Parra, M.
(2012) Dual language exposure and early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 39 (1), 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iluz-Cohen, P., & Armon-Lotem, S.
(2013) Language proficiency and executive control in bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16 (4), 884–899. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luk, G., & Bialystok, E.
(2013) Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25 (5), 605–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luk, G., De Sa, E., & Bialystok, E.
(2011) Is there a relation between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14 (4), 588–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M.
(2007) The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50 (4), 940–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin-Rhee, M. M., & Bialystok, E.
(2008) The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11 (1), 81–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marton, K.
(2015a) Theoretically driven experiments may clarify questions about the bilingual advantage. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (1), 37–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b, May). Do bilingual children perform more efficiently in experimental tasks than their monolingual peers? Paper presented at the Workshop on Bilingualism and Executive functions. An interdisciplinary approach. New York, NY.
Marton, K., Campanelli, L., Eichorn, N., Scheuer, J., & Yoon, J.
(2014) Information processing and proactive interference in children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57 (1), 106–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazuka, R., Jincho, N., & Oishi, H.
(2009) Development of executive control and language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3 (1), 59–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milner, B.
(1963) Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting: The role of the frontal lobes. Archives of Neurology, 91, 100–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A.
(2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 411, 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morales, J., Calvo, A., & Bialystok, E.
(2013) Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114 (2), 187–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicolay, A. C., & Poncelet, M.
(2013) Cognitive advantage in children enrolled in a second-language immersion elementary school program for three years. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16 (03), 597–607. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novick, J. M., Hussey, E., Teubner-Rhodes, S., Harbison, J. I., & Bunting, M. F.
(2013) Clearing the garden-path: Improving sentence processing through cognitive control training. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29 (2), 186–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owen, A. M., Roberts, A. C., Hodges, J. R., Summers, B. A., Polkey, C. E., & Robbins, T. W.
(1993) Contrasting mechanisms of impaired attentional set-shifting in patients with frontal lobe damage or Parkinson’s disease. Brain, 1161, 1159–1175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, L. H., Wynn, V., Gilhooly, K. J., Della Sala, S., & Logie, R. H.
(1999) The role of memory in the Tower of London task. Memory, 7 (2), 209–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portocarrero, J. S., Burright, R. G., & Donovick, P. J.
(2007) Vocabulary and verbal fluency of bilingual and monolingual college students. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 221, 415–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tao, L., Marzecová, A., Taft, M., Asanowicz, D., & Wodniecka, Z.
(2011) The efficiency of attentional networks in early and late bilinguals: the role of age of acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2 (123), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tse, C. & Altarriba, J.
(2014) The relationship between language proficiency and attentional control in Cantonese-English bilingual children: evidence from Simon, Simon switching, and working memory tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, (954), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valian, V.
(2015) Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (1), 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

BAILEY, CASSANDRA, AMANDA VENTA & HILLARY LANGLEY
2020. The bilingual [dis]advantage. Language and Cognition 12:2 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Boerma, Tessel & Elma Blom
2020. Effects of developmental language disorder and bilingualism on children’s executive functioning: A longitudinal study. Research in Developmental Disabilities 107 ► pp. 103782 ff. DOI logo
Boerma, Tessel, Merel van Witteloostuijn & Elma Blom
2022. Nonverbal Switching Ability of Monolingual and Bilingual Children with and without Developmental Language Disorder. Languages 7:2 ► pp. 108 ff. DOI logo
Gampe, Anja, Ira Kurthen & Moritz M. Daum
2018. BILEX: A new tool measuring bilingual children’s lexicons and translational equivalents. First Language 38:3 ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Gampe, Anja, Stephanie Wermelinger & Moritz M. Daum
2019. Bilingual Children Adapt to the Needs of Their Communication Partners, Monolinguals Do Not. Child Development 90:1 ► pp. 98 ff. DOI logo
Jansen, Silke, Sonja Higuera del Moral, Jessica Stefanie Barzen, Pia Reimann & Markus Opolka
2021. Historical Development and State of the Art in Experimental Research on the “Bilingual Advantage/Disadvantage”. In Demystifying Bilingualism, ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Jansen, Silke, Sonja Higuera del Moral, Jessica Stefanie Barzen, Pia Reimann & Markus Opolka
2021. War, Business, and Sports: Contention Metaphors as the Leading Model in Understanding Bilingualism. In Demystifying Bilingualism, ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Jung, Koeun, Luvsantseren Azzaya & Yoonki Min
2024. Cognitive Benefits of Bilingualism: Exploring Research Trends and Proposing Research Directions. Journal of Social Science 35:1 ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Marton, Klara & Zhamilya Gazman
2019. Chapter 18. Interactions among speed of processing, cognitive control, age, and bilingualism. In Bilingualism, Executive Function, and Beyond [Studies in Bilingualism, 57], ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Sekerina, Irina A. & Lauren Spradlin
2016. Bilingualism and executive function. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:5 ► pp. 505 ff. DOI logo
Struys, Esli, Jill Surmont, Piet Van de Craen, Olga Kepinska & Maurits Van den Noort
2019. Bilingual language control across modalities. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:4-5 ► pp. 542 ff. DOI logo
Surmont, Jill, Piet Van de Craen, Olga Kepinska, Maurits Van den Noort & Maurits Van den Noort
2021. Bilingual language control across modalities. In Psycholinguistic Approaches to Production and Comprehension in Bilingual Adults and Children [Benjamins Current Topics, 117], ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
van den Noort, Maurits, Esli Struys, Peggy Bosch, Lars Jaswetz, Benoît Perriard, Sujung Yeo, Pia Barisch, Katrien Vermeire, Sook-Hyun Lee & Sabina Lim
2019. Does the Bilingual Advantage in Cognitive Control Exist and If So, What Are Its Modulating Factors? A Systematic Review. Behavioral Sciences 9:3 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Bilingualism, Language Development and Processing across the Lifespan [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 15], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.