Article published in:
Bilingualism and Executive Function: An interdisciplinary approach
Edited by Irina A. Sekerina and Lauren Spradlin
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:5] 2016
► pp. 685698
References

References

Anderson, S. R.
(1992) A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abutalebi, J., & Green, D. W.
(in press). Neuroimaging of language control in bilinguals: neural adaptation and reserve. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
Baayen, R. H.
(2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E.
(2009) Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 3–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D.
(2005) Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 109–127). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009) Age and the end state of second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 401–424). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Bozic, M., Tyler, L. K., Su, L., Wingfield, C., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
(2013) Neurobiological systems for lexical representation and analysis in English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1678–1691. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., & Miller, A. K.
(2013) Inhibitive and facilitative priming induced by traces in the processing of wh-dependencies in a second language. Second Language Research, 29, 345–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., Keuleers, E.
(2011) Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R.
(1999) Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & Moscoso Del Prado Martín, F.
(2009) Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 684–691. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., Marslen-Wilson, W.
(2000) Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1277–1288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldrick, M., Putnam, M., & Schwarz, L.
(in press). Coactivation in bilingual grammars: A computational account of code mixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E., & Wiley, E.
(2003) Critical evidence: A test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 14, 31–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R.
(2015) Why it is pointless to ask under which specific circumstances the bilingual advantage occurs. Cortex73, 336–337. 15 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heyer, V., & Clahsen, H.
(2015) Late bilinguals see a scan in scanner AND in scandal: Dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of derived words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 543–550. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, G., Heyer, V., & Veríssimo, J.
(2016) Aiming at the same target: A masked priming study directly comparing derivation and inflection in the second language. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S., Newport, E. L.
(1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A. & Rodriguez, G. A.
(2015) Second language sentence processing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kırkıcı, B., & Clahsen, H.
(2013) Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 776–794. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liang, L., & Chen, B.
(2014) Processing morphologically complex words in second-language learners: The effect of proficiency. Acta Psychologica, 150, 69–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F.
(2008) Cross-language lexical processes and inhibitory control. Mental Lexicon, 3, 349–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luk, G., de Sa, E., & Bialystok, E.
(2011) Is there a relation between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control?. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 588–595. Crossref.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
(2007) Morphological processes in language comprehension. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 175–193). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Bozic, M., & Randall, B.
(2008) Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 394–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pelham, S. D., & Abrams, L.
(2013) Cognitive advantages and disadvantages in early and late bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 313–325.Google Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1994) The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Morrow. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raveh, M., and Rueckl, J. G.
(2000) Equivalent effects of inflected and derived primes: Long-term morphological priming in fragment completion and lexical decision. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 103–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B.
(2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva, R. & Clahsen, H.
(2008) Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 245–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanners, R. F., Neisser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., & Hall, R.
(1979) Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stump, G.
(2001) Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valian, V.
(2015) Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 3–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanhove, J.
(2013) The critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition: A statistical critique and a reanalysis. PLoS ONE, 8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veríssimo, J. & Clahsen, H.
(2009) Morphological priming by itself: A study of Portuguese conjugations. Cognition, 112, 187–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veríssimo, J., Heyer, V., Jacob, G., & Clahsen, H.
(2016) Evidence for a sensitive period Selective effects of age of acquisition on morphological priming. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Voga, M., Anastassiadis-Syméonidis, A., & Giraudo, H.
(2014) Does morphology play a role in L2 processing? Two masked priming experiments with Greek speakers of ESL. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 37, 338–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y.
(2014) Processing relative clauses in Chinese as a second language. Second Language Research, 30, 439–461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Clahsen, Harald & Claudia Felser
2018. SOME NOTES ON THE SHALLOW STRUCTURE HYPOTHESIS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:3  pp. 693 ff. Crossref logo
Coughlin, Caitlin E., Robert Fiorentino, Phaedra Royle & Karsten Steinhauer
2019. Sensitivity to Inflectional Morphology in a Non-native Language: Evidence From ERPs. Frontiers in Communication 4 Crossref logo
REIFEGERSTE, JANA, KIRILL ELIN & HARALD CLAHSEN
2019. Persistent differences between native speakers and late bilinguals: Evidence from inflectional and derivational processing in older speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22:3  pp. 425 ff. Crossref logo
Sekerina, Irina A. & Lauren Spradlin
2016. Bilingualism and executive function. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:5  pp. 505 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.