Jacques Jayez | Institute for Cognitive Sciences - Marc Jeannerod (ISC-MJ UMR 5304, CNRS – University Lyon 1), France
Arthur Stepanov | Center for Cognitive Science of Language, University of Nova Gorica, Slovenia
Anne Reboul | Institute for Cognitive Sciences - Marc Jeannerod (ISC-MJ UMR 5304, CNRS – University Lyon 1), France
The experimental literature on the pragmatic abilities of bilinguals is rather sparse. The only study investigating adult second language (L2) learners (Slabakova, 2010) found an increase of pragmatic responses in that population relative to monolinguals. The results of studies on early bilingual children are unclear, some finding a significant increase in pragmatic responses in early bilingual children (preschoolers) relative to monolinguals (Siegal et al., 2007), while another (Antoniou and Katsos, 2017), testing school children, does not. We tested adult French L2 learners of English and Spanish (in their two languages) as well as French monolingual controls in Experiment 1 and Italian-Slovenian early bilingual children (in both languages) and Slovenian monolingual controls in Experiment 2. Our results were similar to those of Antoniou and Katsos (2017) in early bilingual children, but different from those of Siegal et al. (2007). We found no pragmatic bias in adult L2 leaners relative to adult monolinguals.
(2017) The effect of childhood multilingualism and bilectalism on implicatures understanding. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1–47.
Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A.
(2011) Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition, 1181, 84–93.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–8. Retrieved from [URL].
(1988) Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental Psychology, 241, 560–567.
(1993) Metalinguistic awareness: “The development of children’s representations of language”. In C. Pratt, A. Garton (eds), Systems of representation in children: development and use (pp. 211–233). London: Wiley & Sons.
(1999) Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 701, 636–644.
(2011) Reshaping the mind: The benefits of bilingualism. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 651, 229–235.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., Green, D. & Gollan, T.
(2009) Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 101, 89–129.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. & Luk, G.
(2012) Bilingualism: consequences for the mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16/4, 240–250.
Bialystok, E., Luk, G., Peets, K. F., & Yang, S.
(2010) Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 131, 525–531.
Bott, L., Bailey, T. M., & Grodner, D.
(2012) Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures. Journal of Memory and Language, 661, 123–142.
Bott, L., & Noveck, I. A.
(2004) Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 511, 437–457.
Braine, M. D. S., & Rumain, B.
(1981) Development of comprehension of “Or”: Evidence for a sequence of competencies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 311, 46–70.
Chemla, E., & Spector, B.
(2011) Experimental evidence for embedded scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics, 281, 359–400.
Costa, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N.
(2014) How does the bilingual experience sculpt the brain?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 151, 336–345.
(1999) Childhood bilingualism and metalinguistic skills: Analysis and control in young Swedish-English bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 201, 1–20.
Degen, J., & Tanenhaus, M. K.
(2011) Making inferences: the case of scalar implicatures processing. In L. Carlson, C. Holscher, and T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3299–3304). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M.
(1981) Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.
Feeney, A., Scrafton, S., Duckworth, A., & Handley, S. J.
(2004) The story of some: Everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58/2, 121–132.
(2012) Scalar implicatures in child language: give children a chance. Language Learning and Development, 81, 365–394.
Genesee, F., Nicoladis, E., & Paradis, J.
(1995) Language differentiation in early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 221, 611–631.
(1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grodner, D. J., Klein, N. M., Carbary, K. M., and Tanenhaus, M. K.
(2010) “Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment. Cognition, 1161, 42–55.
Gualmini, A., Crain, S., Meroni, L., Chierchia, G., & Guasti, M. T.
(2001) At the semantics/pragmatics interface in child language. In R. Hastings, B. Jackson, and Z. Zvolensky (eds.) Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT XI), (231–247). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Guasti, M. T., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L.
(2005) Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20:5, 667–696.
Hilbe, J. M.
(2009) Logistic Regression Models. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall, CRC Texts in Statistical Science.
Horn, L. R.
(2004) Implicature. In L. R. Horn, & G. Ward (Eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics (3–28). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P.
(2008) Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models. Biometrical Journal, 50/3, 346–363.
Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J.
(2009) Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognitive Psychology, 581, 376–415.
Katsos, N., & Bishop, D. V. M.
(2011) Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicatures. Cognition, 1201, 67–81.
Levinson, S. C.
(2000) Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Language, Speech, and Communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Noveck, I. A.
(2001) When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicatures. Cognition, 781, 165–188.
Noveck, I. A., & Posada, A.
(2003) Characterizing the time course of an implicature. Brain and Language, 851, 203–210.
Noveck, I. A., & Sperber, D.
(2007) The why and how of experimental pragmatics: The case of ‘scalar inferences’. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Advances in Pragmatics (pp. 184–212). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Oller, D., Pearson, B., & Cobo-Lewis, A.
(2007) Profile effects in early bilingual language and literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 281, 191–230.
Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J.
(2003) Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognition, 861, 253–282.
Papafragou, A., & Tantalou, N.
(2004) Children’s computation of implicatures. Language Acquisition, 12/1, 71–82.
Pouscoulous, N., Noveck, I. A., Politzer, G., & Bastide, A.
(2007) A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production. Language Acquisition, 14/4, 347–375.
Siegal, M., Matsuo, A., Pond, C., & Otsu, Y.
(2007) Bilingualism and cognitive development: Evidence from scalar implicatures. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings from the Eight Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Siegal, M., Iozzi, L., & Surian, L.
(2009) Bilingualism and conversational understanding in young children. Cognition, 1101, 115–122.
Siegal, M., Surian, L., Matsuo, A., Geraci, A., Iozzi, L., Okumura, Y., & Itakura, S.
2022. QUD sensitivity in the computation of scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition 29:2 ► pp. 182 ff.
Stateva, Penka, Sara Andreetta, Anne Reboul & Arthur Stepanov
2021. Bilingual Children’s Use of the ‘Maximize Presupposition’ Principle. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.