Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 9:3 (2019) ► pp.398–426

Straight from the horse’s mouth

Agreement attraction effects with Turkish possessors

| Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism
| Middle East Technical University
| Technische Universität Braunschweig
| Middle East Technical University
| Middle East Technical University
| Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism
We investigated the comprehension of subject-verb agreement in Turkish-German bilinguals using two tasks. The first task elicited speeded judgments to verb number violations in sentences that contained plural genitive modifiers. We addressed whether these modifiers elicited attraction errors, which have supported the use of a memory retrieval mechanism in monolingual comprehension studies. The second task examined the comprehension of a language-specific constraint of Turkish against plural-marked verbs with overt plural subjects. Bilinguals showed a reduced application of this constraint, as compared to Turkish monolinguals. Critically, both groups showed similar rates of attraction, but the bilingual group accepted ungrammatical sentences more often. We propose that the similarity in attraction rates supports the use of the same retrieval mechanism, but that bilinguals have more problems than monolinguals in the mapping of morphological to abstract agreement features during speeded comprehension, which results in increased acceptability of ungrammatical sentences.
Keywords: agreement attraction, bilingualism, Turkish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Agreement attraction in Turkish
  • 3.The current study
  • 4.Methods
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Materials
    • 4.3Procedure and analysis
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Attraction task
    • 5.2UNP task
  • 6.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17019.lag
References (67)
References
Abrahantes, J. C. & Aerts, M. (2012). A solution to separation for clustered binary data. Statistical Modelling, 12, 1, 3–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Acuña-Fariña, J. C., Meseguer, E., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Gender and number agreement in comprehension in Spanish. Lingua, 1431, 108–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albirini, A., Benmamoun, E., & Chakrani, B. (2013). Gender and number agreement in the oral production of Arabic heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 161, 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Almeida, D., & Tucker, M. (2017). The Complex Structure of Agreement Errors: Evidence from Distributional Analyses of Agreement Attraction in Arabic. Proceedings of the 47th Meeting of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Arslan, S., de Kok, D. & Bastiaanse, R. (2015). Processing grammatical evidentiality and time reference in heritage and monolingual Turkish speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 3, 457–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badecker, W., and Kuminiak, F. (2007). Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production: evidence from gender and case in Slovak. Journal of Memory and Language, 561, 65–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bamyacı, E. (2016). Competing Structures in the Bilingual Mind: A Psycholinguistic Investigation of Optional Verb Number Agreement. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bamyacı, E., Häussler, J., Kabak, B. (2014). The interaction of animacy and number agreement: An experimental investigation. Lingua, 1481, 254–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. (2013). Random-effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 3, 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M. (2013). Heritage Languages and Their Speakers: Opportunities and Challenges for Linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 391, 129–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blanche, P. & Merino, B. J. (1989). Self-Assessment of Foreign-Language Skills: Implications for Teachers and Researchers. Language Learning, 39, 3, 313–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolonyai, A. (2007). (In)vulnerable agreement in incomplete bilingual L1 learners. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 111, 3–2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coşkun, H. (2010). Question elements in Turkish complement clauses. Turkic Languages, 141: 43–68.Google Scholar
de Groot, C. (2005). The grammars of Hungarian outside Hungary from a linguistic-typological perspective. In A. Fenyvesi (Ed.), Hungarian language contact outside Hungary, 351–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dillon, B., Clifton, Jr., C., & Frazier, L. (2014). Pushed aside: Parentheticals and Processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 4, 483–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., & Phillips, C. (2013). Contrasting interference profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 2, 85–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drummond, A. (2013). Ibex Farm. Available at [URL].
Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., & Bock, K. (2005). Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review, 1121, 531–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenyvesi, A. (2000). The affectedness of the verbal complex in American Hungarian. In A. Fenyvesi & K. Sándor (Eds.), Language contact and the verbal complex of Dutch and Hungarian. Working papers from the 1st Bilingual Language Use Theme Meeting of the Study Centre on Language Contact, November 11–13, 1999, Szeged, Hungary, 94–107. Szeged: JGyTF Press.Google Scholar
Firth, D. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 801, 27–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foote, R. (2011). Integrated knowledge of agreement in early and late English-Spanish bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 321, 187–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., & Nicol, J. (2002). Attraction in sentence production: The role of syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 171, 371–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A., Jakulin, A., Pittau, M. G. & Su, T. S. (2008). A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. Annals of Applied Statistics, 21, 1360–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E., Piantadosi, S., & Fedorenko, K. (2011). Using Mechanical Turk to obtain and analyze English acceptability judgments. Language and Linguistic Compass, 51, 509–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Göksel, A. (1987). Distance restrictions on syntactic processes. In H. E. Boeschoten & L. T. Verhoeven (Eds.), Studies on Modern Turkish: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Turkish Linguistics (pp. 69–81). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Göksel, A., & Kerslake, C. (2005). Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Antón-Méndez, I., & van Zee, M. (2001). Object attraction in subject-verb agreement construction. Journal of Memory and Language, 451, 546–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Häussler, J. (2012). The emergence of attraction errors during sentence comprehension. Doctoral Dissertation, Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 434–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, L., Engelmann, F., & Vasishth, S. (2017). Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension: Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 941, 316–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T. & Rothman, J. (2016). Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1–9.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Bruun Brockhoff, P., & Haubo Bojesen Christensen, R. (2014). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R package version 2.0–11. [URL].
Lago, S., Shalom, D., Sigman, M., Lau, E., & Phillips, C. (2015). Agreement attraction in Spanish comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 821, 133–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 441, 325–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorimor, H., Bock, J. K., Zalkind, E., Sheyman, A., & Beard, R. (2008). Number Agreement and Attraction in Russian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 231, 769–799. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorimor, H., Jackson, C. N., & Foote, R. (2015). How gender affects number: Cue-based retrieval in agreement production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 301, 947–954. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 4, 940–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Structural changes in Spanish in the United States: Differential object marking in Spanish heritage speakers across generations. Lingua, 1511, 177–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Bhatt, R. & Bhatia, A. (2012). Erosion of case and agreement in Hindi heritage speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 21, 141–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J., & Antón-Méndez, I. (2009). “The effect of case marking on subject – verb agreement errors in English,” in Time and Again: Theoretical Perspectives on Formal Linguistics in Honor of D. Terence Langendoen, eds W. D. Lewis, S. Karimi, H. Harley, and S. O. Farrar, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 135–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., & Barker, J. E. (2016). Minimal Interference from Possessor Phrases in the Production of Subject-Verb Agreement. Frontiers in Psychology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J. L., Forster, K. I., & Veres, C. (1997). Subject – verb agreement processes in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 361, 569–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J., & Wilson, R. (1999). “Agreement and case-marking in Russian: a psycholinguistic investigation of agreement errors in production,” in The Eight Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Languages. The Philadelphia Meeting (Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications), 314–327.Google Scholar
Pearlmutter, N. J., Garnsey, S. M., & Bock, K. (1999). Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 411, 427–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L. (2015). The role of processing in language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5, 4, 409–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. (1997). Cross-linguistic parallels in language loss. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 141/1–2, 87–123.Google Scholar
(2006). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 141, 191–262.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M., & Kagan, O. (2007). Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 5, 368–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL].
Ristic, B., Molinaro, N., & Mancini, S., (2016). Agreement attraction in Serbian: Decomposing markedness. The Mental Lexicon, 11, 2, 242–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. (1998). Self-assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing, 51, 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. & Treffers-Daller, J. (2014). A prolegomenon to the construct of the native speaker: heritage speaker bilinguals are natives too! Applied Linguistics, 351, 93–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, C., (1999). The Turkish Nominal Phrase in Spoken Discourse. Harrassowitz Verlag, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Scontras, G., Fuchs, Z., & Polinsky, M. (2015). Heritage language and linguistic theory. Frontiers in Psychology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sezer, E., (1978). Eylemlerin çoğul öznelere uyumu. Genel Dilbilim Dergisi, Ankara Dilbilim Çevresi Derneği, Ankara, 25–32.Google Scholar
Sherkina-Lieber, M. (2011). Comprehension of Labrador Inuttitut functional morphology by receptive bilinguals. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Sherkina-Lieber, M., Perez-Leroux, A. T. & Johns, A. (2011). Grammar without speech production: The case of Labrador Inuttitut heritage receptive bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 141, 301–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solomon, E. S., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (2004). Semantic integration and syntactic planning in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 491, 1–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2004). Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax-discourse interface: Data, interpretation and methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 71, 143–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprouse, J. (2011). A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory. Behavioral Research Methods, 431, 155–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, D., Grey, S., & van Hell, J. (2017). Dissociating retrieval interference and reanalysis in the P600 during sentence comprehension. Psychophysiology, 248–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, D., Nicol, J., & Brehm, L. (2014). The time course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction. Journal of Memory and Language, 761, 195–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tucker, M. A., Idrissi, A., & Almeida, D. (2015). Representing Number in the Real-Time Processing of Agreement: Self-Paced Reading Evidence from Arabic. Frontiers in Psychology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagers, M., Lau, E., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 611, 206–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagers, M. W., Phillips, C. (2014). Going the distance: memory and control processes in active dependency construction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 671, 1274–1304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Bleotu, Adina Camelia & Brian Dillon
2024. Romanian (subject-like) DPs attract more than bare nouns: Evidence from speeded continuations. Journal of Memory and Language 134 ► pp. 104445 ff. DOI logo
Keshev, Maayan & Aya Meltzer-Asscher.
2024. The representation of agreement features in memory is updated during sentence processing: Evidence from verb-reflexive interactions. Journal of Memory and Language 135 ► pp. 104495 ff. DOI logo
Türk, Utku & Pavel Logačev
2024. Agreement attraction in Turkish: the case of genitive attractors. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 39:4 ► pp. 448 ff. DOI logo
Chromý, Jan, Radim Lacina & Jakub Dotlačil
2023. Number Agreement Attraction in Czech Comprehension: Negligible Facilitation Effects. Open Mind 7 ► pp. 802 ff. DOI logo
Pasquereau, Jérémy, Brian Dillon & Lyn Frazier
2023. Quantification at a distance and grammatical illusions in French. Syntax DOI logo
Uygun, Serkan & Claudia Felser
2023. Constraints on subject-verb agreement marking in Turkish-German bilingual speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13:2 ► pp. 190 ff. DOI logo
Bhatia, Sakshi & Brian Dillon
2022. Processing agreement in Hindi: When agreement feeds attraction. Journal of Memory and Language 125 ► pp. 104322 ff. DOI logo
Felser, Claudia & Serkan Uygun
2022. Optional Plural Agreement in Heritage Turkish Speakers’ Verb Form Choices. Heritage Language Journal 19:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Paspali, Anastasia, Vasiliki Rizou & Artemis Alexiadou
2022. Aspect in Heritage Greek: evidence from elicited production and online judgments. Applied Psycholinguistics 43:2 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Uygun, Serkan
2022. Processing pro-drop features in heritage Turkish. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Uygun, Serkan
2023. Vulnerability in processing definiteness: The case of heritage Turkish. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Cherepovskaia, Natalia, Elizaveta Reutova & Natalia Slioussar
2021. Becoming Native-Like for Good or Ill: Online and Offline Processing of Case Forms in L2 Russian. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
González Alonso, Jorge, Ian Cunnings, Hiroki Fujita, David Miller & Jason Rothman
2021. Gender attraction in sentence comprehension. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo
Paspali, Anastasia & Theodoros Marinis
2020. Gender Agreement Attraction in Greek Comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Reifegerste, Jana, Rebecca Jarvis & Claudia Felser
2020. Effects of chronological age on native and nonnative sentence processing: Evidence from subject-verb agreement in German. Journal of Memory and Language 111 ► pp. 104083 ff. DOI logo
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019. Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.