The action dynamics of native and non-native speakers of English in processing active and passive sentences
This study investigates processing of passive and active constructions between native speakers (NS) and non-native speakers (NNS) of
English using traditional on-line mechanisms such as response time in conjunction with techniques that capitalize on the parallel activation
of distributed mental representations during online syntactic processing. In the current study, hand motions captured by a mouse-tracking
system were used to index listeners’ cognitive processes while making commitments to different choice alternatives during the processing of
English passive and active structures. During data collection, 57 NNS and 43 NS carried out an aural forced-choice picture identification
task. Data analysis indicated differences and similarities between NS and NNS participants such that NS participants are faster at
responding to passive and active stimuli, travel less distance, and make fewer directional changes when compared to NNS participants.
However, all participants showed similar trends for passive processing, suggesting comparable difficulties in processing passive
constructions.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Syntactic processing of passive constructions
- 3.Language processing and action dynamics: Methodological advantages
- 4.Current study
- 5.Method
- 5.1Participants
- 5.2Materials and study design
- 5.3Apparatus and procedure
- 5.4Mouse-trajectory properties
- Latency time
- Motion time
- Velocity (max and max onset)
- Distance
- Area under the curve (AUC)
- Directional change
- 6.Data analyses
- 7.Results
- 8.Summary
- 9.Discussion
- 10.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Note
-
References
References (49)
Abrams, R., & Balota, D.
(
1991)
Mental chronometry: Beyond reaction time.
Psychological Science, 21, 153–157.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barca, L., & Pezzulo, G.
(
2012)
Unfolding Visual Lexical Decision in Time.
PLoS ONE, 7(4), e35932.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B.
(
2014)
lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using s4 classes.
R package version 3.3.2.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
(
1989)
Functionalism and the Competition Model. (pp. 3–73) In
B. MacWhinney and
E. Bates (Eds.),
The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bencini, G., & Valian, V.
(
2008)
Abstract sentence representation in 3-year-olds: Evidence from language production and comprehension.
Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 97–113.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benedet, M., Christiansen, J., & Goodglass, H.
(
1996)
A crosslinguistic study of grammatical morphology in Spanish and English speaking agrammatic patients.
Cortex, 341, 309–336,
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blanco-Gomez, M. L.
(
2002)
Hiding the agent in English and Spanish newspaper articles. In
J. Marin Arrese (Ed.).
Conceptualization of events in newspaper discourse. 9–30, Madrid: Universidad Complutense.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bock, K.
(
1986)
Syntactic persistence in language production.
Cognitive Psychology, 181, 355–387.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown & P. Hagoort
Eds.
The neurocognition of language pp. 83 122 Oxford Oxford University Press
Coco, M. I., & Duran, N. D.
(
2016)
When expectations collide: Action dynamics reveal the interaction between stimulus plausibility and congruency.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 231, 1920–1931.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coco, M. I. & Duran, N. D.
(
2015)
Mousetrack: Mouse-Tracking Measures from Trajectory Data. R package version 1.0.0
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohen, J.
(
1988)
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dale, R., Kehoe, C., & Spivey, M. J.
(
2007)
Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars.
Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 15–28.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dale, R., Snyder, K., Mccall, R., & Sporns, O.
(
2008)
Exploring Action Dynamics as an Index of Paired-Associate Learning.
PLoS ONE, 3(3), e1728.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dale, R., & Duran, N. D.
(
2011)
The cognitive dynamics of negated sentence verification.
Cognitive Science, 351, 983–996.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duran, N. D., Dale, R., & McNamara, D. S.
(
2010)
The action dynamics of overcoming the truth.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 171, 486–491.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duran, N. D., & Dale, R.
(
2014)
Perspective-taking in dialogue as self-organization under social constraints.
New Ideas in Psychology, 321, 131–146.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diessel, H.
(
2004)
The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farmer, T. A., Anderson, S. E., & Spivey, M. J.
(
2007)
Gradiency and visual context in syntactic garden-paths.
Journal of Memory & Language, 571, 570–595.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferreira, F.
(
2003)
The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences.
Cognitive Psychology, 471, 164–203.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N.
(
2010)
MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method,
Behavior Research Methods, 42 (1), 226–241.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freeman, J. B., Dale, R., & Farmer, T. A.
(
2011)
Hand in motion reveals mind in motion.
Frontiers in Psychology, 21, 59.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N.
(
2001)
Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 51, 10–16.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hehman, E., Stolier, R. M., & Freeman, J. B.
(
2015)
Advanced mouse-tracking analytic techniques for enhancing psychological science.
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(3), 384–401.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Incera, S., & McLennan, C. T.
(
2016)
Mouse tracking reveals that bilinguals behave like experts.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 191, 610–620.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, P. C.
(
2014)
Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth’s R2GLMM to random slopes models.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5(9), 944–946.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K.
(
2016)
Prime Repetition and Korean EFL Learners’ Comprehension and Production of Passives.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 541, 319–346.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K.
(
2008)
Learners’ production of passives during syntactic priming activities.
Applied Linguistics, 291, 149–154.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koop, G. J., & Johnson, J. G.
(
2011)
Response dynamics: A new window on the decision process.
Judgment and Decision Making, 61, 750–758.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuperberg, G. R., Kreher, D. A., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D. N., & Holcomb, P. J.
(
2007)
The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials.
Brain and language, 100(3), 223–237.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E.
(Eds.) (
1989)
The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Magnuson, J.
(
2005)
Moving hand reveals dynamics of thought.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(29), 9995–9996.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marinis, T.
(
2007)
On-line processing of passives in L1 and L2 children. In
Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA), (pp. 265–276),
Belikova, A.,
Meroni, L., &
Umeda, M. (Eds.). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marchman, V., Bates, E., Burkardt, A. & Good, A.
(
1991)
Functional constraints of the acquisition of the passive : Toward a model of the competence to perform.
First Language, 111, 65–92.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McKinstry, C., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J.
(
2008)
Action Dynamics Reveal Parallel Competition in Decision Making.
Psychological Science, 19(1), 22–24.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Messenger, K., Branigan, H., & McLean, J.
(
2012)
Is children’s acquisition of the passive a staged process? Evidence from six and nine year olds’ production of passives,
Journal of Child Language, 391, 991–1016,
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mirman, D.
(
2014)
Growth Curve Analysis and Visualization Using R. Taylor & Francis.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morett, L. M., & Macwhinney, B.
(
2012)
Syntactic transfer in English-speaking Spanish learners.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 161, 132–151.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Hora, D., Dale, R., Piiroinen, P. T., & Connolly, F.
(
2013)
Local dynamics in decision making: The evolution of preference within and across decisions.
Scientific Reports, 31, 1–9.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Song, J. H., & Nakayama, K.
(
2006)
Role of focal attention on latencies and trajectories of visually guided manual pointing.
Journal of Vision, 61, 982–995.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Song, J. H., and Nakayama, K.
(
2009)
Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks.
Trends in Cognitive Science, 131, 360–366.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G.
(
2005)
Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1021, 10393–10398.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spivey, M. J., & Dale, R.
(
2006)
Continuous dynamics in real-time cognition.
Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 207–211.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tabatabaeian, M., Dale, R., & Duran, N. D.
(
2015)
Self-serving dishonest decisions can show facilitated cognitive dynamics.
Cognitive Processing, 161, 291–300.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Houghton, G.
(
1998)
Action-based mechanisms of attention.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 3531, 1385–1393.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G.
(
2014)
Do people automatically track others’ beliefs? Evidence from a continuous measure.
Cognition, 130(1), 128–133.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
West, M.
(
1953)
A General Service List of English Words, London: Longman
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wojnowicz, M. T., Ferguson, M. J., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J.
(
2009)
The Self-Organization of Explicit Attitudes.
Psychological Science, 20(11), 1428–1435.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yu, Z., Wang, F., Wang, D., & Bastin, M.
(
2012)
Beyond reaction times: Incorporating mouse-tracking measures into the implicit association test to examine its underlying process.
Social Cognition, 30(3), 289–306.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Rivollier, Guillaume, Jean-Charles Quinton, Corentin Gonthier & Annique Smeding
2021.
Looking with the (computer) mouse: How to unveil problem-solving strategies in matrix reasoning without eye-tracking.
Behavior Research Methods 53:3
► pp. 1081 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Nuzzo, Regina L.
2020.
Principles for Writing about Quantitative Research.
PM&R 12:4
► pp. 420 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Ferguson, Ashley M., Jennifer M. Roche & Hayley S. Arnold
2019.
Social Judgments of Digitally Manipulated Stuttered Speech: An Evaluation of Self-Disclosure on Cognition.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62:11
► pp. 3986 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.