Translation ambiguity in Mandarin-English bilinguals
Translation production differences in concrete, abstract, and emotion words
Research focused on the cognitive processes surrounding bilingual language representation has revealed the important role that translation ambiguity plays in how languages are stored in memory (Tokowicz & Kroll, 2007). In addition, translation of emotionally related information has been shown to be challenging because a direct translation does not always exist (Basnight-Brown & Altarriba, 2014). The focus of the current study was to explore the processing of ambiguous words for translations that differ in orthography. In Experiment 1, Chinese-English bilinguals translated concrete and abstract words that differed in the number of translations across languages. In Experiment 2, emotion words were introduced into the context, in order to examine differences in emotion translation across languages. The results revealed that words with a single translation were produced faster and more accurately than words that had multiple translations. Finally, translation of emotional stimuli was faster when translating Chinese words as compared to English words.
- 1.1Implications of translation ambiguity in bilinguals
- 1.2Processing differences in concrete, abstract, and emotion stimuli
- 1.3The role of translation ambiguity and concreteness effects
- 4.Experiment 2 – Methods
- 5.Experiment 2 – Results
Published online: 13 November 2018
Altarriba, J., & Basnight-Brown, D. M.
Altarriba, J., & Bauer, L.
Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C.
Anderson, J. R.
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchinson, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., et al.
Basnight-Brown, D. M., & Altarriba, J.
Boada, R., Sánchez-Casas, R. M., Gavilán, J. M., García-Albea, J. E., & Tokowicz, N.
Bracken, J., Degani, T., Eddington, C., & Tokowicz, N.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J.
Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M.
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M.
Degani, T., Prior, A., Eddington, C. M., Areas da Luz Fontes, A., & Tokowicz, N.
Degani, T., Prior, A., & Tokowicz, N.
Degani, T., & Tokowicz, N.
Degani, T., Tseng, A. M., & Tokowicz, N.
Degani, T., Prior, A., Eddington, C. M., Areas da Luz Fontes, A. B., & Tokowicz, N.
Eddington, C., & Tokowicz, N.
Kazanas, S., & Altarriba, J.
Knickerbocker, H., Johnson, R. L., & Altarriba, J.
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E.
Laxén, J., & Lavaur, J.-M.
Lin, J., & Yao, Y.
Prior, A., Kroll, J. F., & MacWhinney, B.
Prior, A., MacWhinney, B., & Kroll, J. F.
Smith, Y., Walters, J., & Prior, A.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M.
Tokowicz, N., & Kroll, J. F.
Tokowicz, N., Kroll, J. F., de Groot, A. M. B., & van Hell, J. G.
Tseng, A. M., Chang, L.-Y., & Tokowicz, N.
(2014) Translation ambiguity between English and Mandarin Chinese: The role of proficiency. In J. Schwieter & A. Ferreira (Eds.), The development of translation competence: Theories and methodologies from psycholinguistics and cognitive science (pp. 107–165). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
van Hell, J. G., & de Groot, A. M. B.
Wen, Y., & van Heuven, W. J.
Cited by 2 other publications
Zhou, Guowei, Yao Chen, Yin Feng & Rong Zhou
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.