References (13)
Ambridge, B., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., & Tomasello, M.
(2006) The distributed learning effect for children’s acquisition of an abstract syntactic construction. Cognitive Development, 21(2), 174–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.
(1973) A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N.
(2016) Creating language: integrating evolution, acquisition, and processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2006) Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Cognition, corpora, and computing: triangulating research in usage-based language learning. Language Learning, 67(51), 40–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B.
(2016) Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and processing. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gries, St. Th
(2008) Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 403–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Operationalizations of domain-general mechanisms cognitive linguists often rely on: a perspective from quantitative corpus linguistics. In S. Engelberg, H. Lobin, K. Steyer, & S. Wolfer (Eds.), Wortschätze: Dynamik, Muster, Komplexität (pp. 75–90). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, St. Th. & Ellis, N. C.
(2015) Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, 65(Supplement 1), 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pine, J. M., Freudental, D., Krajewskyi, G., & Gobet, F.
(2013) Do young children have adult-like syntactic categories? Zipf’s law and the case of the determiner. Cognition, 127(3), 345–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. J. & Levy, R.
(2013) The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition, 128(3), 302–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Stahl, D.
(2004) Sampling children’s spontaneous speech: how much is enough? Journal of Child Language, 31(1), 101–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C.
(2018) A formalist perspective on language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 665–706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by 5 other publications

Enger, Hans-Olav
2022. Type frequency is not the only factor that determines productivity, so the Tolerance Principle is not enough. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 144:2  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Bayram, Fatih, Grazia Di Pisa, Jason Rothman & Roumyana Slabakova
2021. Current Trends and Emerging Methodologies in Charting Heritage Language Grammars. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics,  pp. 545 ff. DOI logo
Rastelli, Stefano
2020. The acquisition of aspect in a second language, DOI logo
Rastelli, Stefano
2020. Contingency learning and perfective morpheme productivity in L2 Italian: A study on lexeme–morpheme associations with ΔP . Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:3  pp. 459 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Research Approaches to Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics,  pp. 373 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.