(2018) Operationalizations of domain-general mechanisms cognitive linguists often rely on: a perspective from quantitative corpus linguistics. In S. Engelberg, H. Lobin, K. Steyer, & S. Wolfer (Eds.), Wortschätze: Dynamik, Muster, Komplexität (pp. 75–90). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.
Gries, St. Th. & Ellis, N. C.
(2015) Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, 65(Supplement 1), 1–28.
Pine, J. M., Freudental, D., Krajewskyi, G., & Gobet, F.
(2013) Do young children have adult-like syntactic categories? Zipf’s law and the case of the determiner. Cognition, 127(3), 345–360.
Smith, N. J. & Levy, R.
(2013) The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition, 128(3), 302–319.
Tomasello, M. & Stahl, D.
(2004) Sampling children’s spontaneous speech: how much is enough?Journal of Child Language, 31(1), 101–121.
2022. Type frequency is not the only factor that determines productivity, so the Tolerance Principle is not enough. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 144:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Bayram, Fatih, Grazia Di Pisa, Jason Rothman & Roumyana Slabakova
2021. Current Trends and Emerging Methodologies in Charting Heritage Language Grammars. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 545 ff.
Rastelli, Stefano
2020. The acquisition of aspect in a second language,
Rastelli, Stefano
2020. Contingency learning and perfective morpheme productivity in L2 Italian: A study on lexeme–morpheme associations with ΔP
. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:3 ► pp. 459 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Research Approaches to Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 373 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.