References

References

Adjemian, C.
(1983) The transferability of lexical properties. In S. M. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 250–268). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ahn, Y. O.
(1995) The aspectual and temporal systems of Korean from the perspective of the two-component theory of aspect (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W.
(1991) Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In T. Huebner & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 305–324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In K. Hyltenstam & Å. Viberg (Eds.), Progression and regression in language (pp. 309–339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y.
(1994) Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 133–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 527–570). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(1998) Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(4), 471–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Tense and aspect in second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Collins, L.
(2002) The roles of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning, 52, 43–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The particulars on universals: A comparison of the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology among Japanese-and French-speaking learners of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(2), 251–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C.
(2004) Effects of instruction on learning a second language: A critique of instructed SLA research. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 181–202). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gabriele, A.
(2009) Transfer and transition in the SLA of aspect. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 371–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gabriele, A., & Hughes, M. S.
(2015) Tense and aspect in Japanese as a second language. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Handbook of Japanese psycholinguistics (pp. 271–302). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helms-Park, R.
(2001) Evidence of lexical transfer in learner syntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 71–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirakawa, M.
(2001) L2 acquisition of Japanese unaccusative verbs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 221–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horton, N. J., Bebchuk, J. D., Jones, C. L., Lipsitz, S. R., Catalano, P. J., Zahner, G. E. P., & Fitzmaurice, G. M.
(1999) Goodness-of-fit for GEE: An example with mental health service utilization. Statistics in Medicine, 18, 213–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. C.
(1999) Tense-aspect marking by L2 learners of English and native English speakers: Inherent lexical aspect and unitary vs. repeated situation types. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 113–29.Google Scholar
Inagaki, S.
(2001) Motion verbs with goal PPs in the L2 acquisition of English and Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 153–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izquierdo, J., & Collins, L.
(2008) The facilitative role of L1 influence in tense-aspect marking: A comparison of Hispanophone and Anglophone learners of French. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 350–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jin, L., & Hendriks, H.
(2003) The development of aspect marking in L1 and L2 Chinese. Working Papers in English and Applied Linguistics, 9, 69–99.Google Scholar
Juffs, A.
(1996) Learnability and the lexicon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaga, M.
(1991) Dictation as a measure of Japanese proficiency. Language Testing, 8(2), 112–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kootstra, G. J. & Şahin, H.
(2018) Crosslinguistic structural priming as a mechanism of contact-induced language change: Evidence from Papiamento-Dutch bilinguals in Aruba and the Netherlands. Language, 94(4), 902–930. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(2003) Revisiting the comparative fallacy. Second Language Research, 19(2), 129–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, E., & Kim, H.-Y.
(2007) On cross-linguistic variations in imperfective aspect: the case of L2 Korean. Language Learning, 57(4), 651–685. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M.
(1995) Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, P., Sepanski, S., & Zhao, X.
(2006) Language history questionnaire: A web-based interface for bilingual speech. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 202–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McClure, W. T.
(1990) A lexical semantic explanation for unaccusative mismatches. In K. Dziwirek, P. Farrell & E. Mejías-Bikandi (Eds.), Grammatical relations: A cross-theoretical perspective (pp. 301–318). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Morgan, S. P., & Teachman, J. D.
(1988) Logistic regression: Description, examples, and comparisons. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 929–936. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robison, R. E.
(1995) Verb inflections in native speaker speech: Do they mean what we think? In H. Pishwa & K. Maroldt (Eds.), The development of morphological systematicity (pp. 199–224) Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Rohde, A.
(2002) The Aspect Hypothesis in naturalistic acquisition: What uninflected and non-target-like verb forms in early interlanguage tell us. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosi, F.
(2009) Connectionist modelling of aspect acquisition in Italian L2. EUROSLA Yearbook, 9, 4–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, M. R.
(1999) The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 151–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Assessing the effect of lexical aspect and grounding on the acquisition of L2 Spanish past tense morphology among L1 English speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(2), 184–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheu, S.
(1997) A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of -te iru by intermediate and advanced Taiwanese learners of Japanese (in Japanese). Nihongo Kyooiku, 95, 37–48.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y.
(1991) Primacy of aspect in language acquisition: Simplified input and prototype (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
(2000) The semantics of the Japanese imperfective -teiru: An integrative approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 327–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) A multiple-factor account for the form-meaning connections in the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 91–112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2007) The Aspect Hypothesis, the comparative fallacy and the validity of obligatory context analysis. Second Language Research, 23(1), 51–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Temporality in first and second language acquisition. In W. Klein & P. Li (Eds.), The expression of time (pp. 167–193). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y., & Kurono, A.
(1998) The acquisition of tense-aspect marking in Japanese as a second language. Language Learning, 48, 245–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y., & Nishi, Y.
(2002) Lexicalisation of aspectual structures in English and Japanese. In A. Giacalone Ramat (Ed.), Typology and second language acquisition (pp. 267–290). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2000) L1 transfer revisited: The L2 acquisition of telicity marking in English by Spanish and Bulgarian native speakers. Linguistics, 38, 739–770. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. S.
(1997) The parameter of aspect (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sugaya, N., & Shirai, Y.
(2007) The acquisition of progressive and resultative meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Can L2 learners productively use Japanese tense-aspect markers? A usage-based approach. In R. Corrigan, E. Moravcsik, H. Ouali & K. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic Language: Volume 2 (pp. 423–444). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
(1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description III (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tanaka, S., & Abe, H.
(1985) Conditions on interlingual semantic transfer. In P. Larson, E. L. Judd & D. S. Messerschmitt (Eds.), On TESOL '84 (pp. 101–120). Washington, D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, S.
(2002) The parameter of actionality. Linguistic Typology, 6, 317–401.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z.
(1957) Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 66, 143–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, L.
(1987) Markedness and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 261–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Leblanc, C. J.
(2009) The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 354–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar