The effect of animacy on object pronoun distinctions in L2 Spanish
When acquiring Spanish object pronouns (OP), English-speaking second language (L2) learners must learn the variety
of forms available, word order, and case distinctions. The acquisition of case distinctions in particular is an aspect that has
not been thoroughly investigated. Zyzik (2006) showed, through production tasks, that
English-speaking L2 Spanish learners overgeneralize the dative form to accusative contexts when the referent is animate. This
study investigates how L2 learners use animacy (human, animal, and inanimate object) instead of case marking as cues to interpret
and produce L2 Spanish object pronouns. Data from an interpretation task and a fill-in-the-blank production task were collected
from 121 intermediate to advanced levels of Spanish learners. Results from linear mixed effects models reveal that learners show
effects of the influence of animacy on object pronoun distinction in comprehension as well as production. A key new finding is
that learners use the dative form with human referents, reserving accusative forms for animals and inanimate referents. These
results provide evidence that animacy cues strongly influence L2 Spanish learners in the formation of their OP paradigm,
especially at lower-proficiency levels. As proficiency increases, L2 learners begin to rely on case cues to distinguish Spanish
OPs.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1Spanish OPs: Forms and regional variation
- 2.2The competition model
- 2.3L Spanish OPs
- Animacy in L Spanish OPs.
- 3.Methods
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Materials
- 3.3Procedure
- 4.Results
- 4.1Sensibility decision task
- 4.2Fill-in-the-blank task
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Research question 1
- 5.2Research question 2
- 5.3Research question 3
- 6.Conclusions
- Notes
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References (54)
Arche, M. J., & Dominguez, L.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
(
1981)
Second language acquisition from a functionalist perspective: pragmatic, semantic and perceptual strategies. In
H. Winitz (Ed.),
Annals of the New York academy of science conference on native and foreign language acquisition (pp. 190–214). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
(
1982)
Functionalist approach to grammar. In
L. R. Gleitman &
E. Wanner (Eds.),
Language acquisition: State of the art (pp. 173–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
(
1987)
Competition, variation, and language learning. In
B. MacWhinney (Ed.),
Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–193). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Blanco, J. A., & Donley, P. R.
(
2009)
Panorama: Introducción a la lengua española (3rd ed.). Boston: Vista Higher Learning.
Bley-Vroman, R.
(
1983)
The comparitive fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity.
Language Learning, 33(1), 1–17.
Chan, A., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
(
2009)
Children’s understanding of the agent-patient relations in the transitive construction: Cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German, and English.
Cognitive Linguistics, 20(2), 267–300.
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
(
2006)
Grammatical processing in language learners.
Applied Pscholinguistics, 27(1), 3–42.
Comrie, B.
(
1989)
Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Demuth, K., Machobane, M., Moloi, F., & Odato, C.
(
2005)
Learning animacy hierarchy effects in Sesotho double object applicatives.
Language, 81(2), 421–447.
Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
(
2008)
German children’s comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences.
Child Development, 79(4), 1152–1167.
Duffield, N. G., & White, L.
(
1999)
Assessing L knowledge of Spanish clitic placement: converging methodologies.
Second Language Research, 15(2), 133–160.
Ellis, N. C.
(
2006)
Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning.
Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 164–194.
Ellis, N. C.
(
2008)
Usage-based and form-focused SLA. In
P. Robinson &
N. C. Ellis (Eds.),
Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). New York: Routledge.
Gass, S. M.
(
1989)
How do learners resolve linguistic conflicts?. In
S. M. Gass and
J. Schachter (Eds.),
Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 183–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geeslin, K. L., García-Amaya, L. J., Hasler-Barker, M., Henriksen, N. C., & Killam, J.
(
2010)
The SLA of direct object pronouns in a study abroad immersion environment where use is a variable. In
C. Borgonovo,
M. Español-Echevarría, &
P. Prévost (Eds.),
Selected proceedings of the 12th hispanic linguistics symposium (pp. 246–259). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceeding Project.
Harrington, M.
(
1987)
Processing transfer: Language-specific processing strategies as a source of interlanguage variation.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 8(4), 351–377.
Heap, D.
(
2000)
Morphological complexity and Spanish object clitic variation. In
C. R. Wiltshire and
J. Camps (Eds.),
Romance phonology and variation: Selected papers from the 30th linguistic symposium on romance languages (pp. 55–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopp, H.
(
2016)
Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition.
Second Language Research, 32(2), 277–307.
Klee, C. A.
(
1989)
The acquisition of clitic pronouns in the Spanish interlanguage of Peruvian Quechua speakers.
Hispania, 72(2), 402–408.
Larson, J. W.
(
1996)
WebCAPE (Computer Adaptive Placement Exam) [computer software]. Provo, Utah: BYU Creative Works.
Lipski, J. M.
(
1994)
Latin American Spanish. New York: Longman Publishing.
Lee, J. F.
(
1987)
Morphological factors influencing pronominal reference assignment by learners of Spanish. In
T. Morgan,
J. F. Lee, &
B. VanPatten,
Language and language use: Studies in Spanish (pp. 221–232). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
MacWhinney, B.
(
2005)
Extending the competition model.
International Journal of Bilingualism, 9(7), 69–84.
MacWhinney, B.
(
2012)
The logic of the unified model. In
S. Gass, &
A. Mackey (Eds.),
Handbook of second langauge acquisition (pp. 221–227). New York: Routledge.
Maldonado, R.
(
2002)
Objective and subjective datives.
Cognitive Linguistics, 13(1), 1–65.
Malovrh, P. A.
(
2008)
A multifaceted analysis of the interlanguage development of Spanish direct-object clitic pronouns observed in L-learner production. Bloomington, IN. Indiana University dissertation.
Malovrh, P. A., & Lee, J. F.
Malovrh, P. A., & Lee, J. F.
(
2013)
The developmental dimension in instructed second language learning: The L acquisition of object pronouns in Spanish. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Olsen, M. K.
(
2013)
The acquisition of case in Spanish pronominal object clitics in English-speaking college-level L learners [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Pittsburgh.
Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J.
(
2007)
The object agreement constraint.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25(2), 315–347.
Ozeki, H. & Shirai, Y.
(
2007)
Does the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy predict the difficulty order in the acquisition of Japanese relative clauses?.
SSLA, 29(2), 169–196.
Psychology Software Tools
(
2001)
E-prime, Pittsburgh, PA.
Pinker, S.
(
1989)
Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Real Academia Española
(
2005)
Diccionario panhispánico de dudas [Electronic version]. Retrieved February 14, 2019 from
[URL]
Rusch, D., Domínguez, M., & Garner, L. C.
(
2014)
Imágenes: An introduction to Spanish language and cultures (3rd ed.). Boston: Heinle.
Salgado-Robles, F.
(
2014)
Variación dialectal por aprendientes de español en un contexto de inmersión en el extranjero.
Lenguas Modernas, 43(1), 97–112.
Salgado-Robles, F., & Ibarra, C. E.
(
2012)
Les voy a echar de menos cuando regrese a los Estados Unidos”: Adquisición de la variación dialectal por aprendientes de español en un contexto de inmersión.
Ogigia: Revista electrónica de estudios hispánicos, 111, 61–77.
Sihler, A. L.
(
1995)
New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. New York: Oxford University Press.
Silva-Corvalán, C.
(
1981)
La función pragmática de la duplicación de pronombres clíticos.
Boletín del instituto de filología de la universidad de Chile, 31(2), 561–570.
Slobin, D. I.
(
1996)
From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In
J. Gumperz and
S. Levinson (Eds.),
Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Tokowicz, N., Michael, E. B., & Kroll, J. F.
(
2004)
The roles of study-abroad experience and working-memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(3), 255–272.
Torrego, E.
(
1995)
On the nature of clitic doubling. In
H. Campos and
P. Kempchinsky (Eds.),
Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory (pp. 399–418). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
VanPatten, B.
(
1984)
Learners’ comprehension of clitic pronouns: More evidence for a word order strategy.
Hispanic Linguistics, 11, 57–67.
VanPatten, B.
(
1990)
Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness.
SSLA, 12(3), 287–301.
VanPatten, B.
(
2003)
From input to output: A teacher’s guide to second language acquisition. New York: McGraw Hill.
VanPatten, B. & Houston, T.
(
1998)
Contextual effects in processing L input sentences.
Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 53–70.
Vázquez Rozas, V.
(
1995)
El complemento indirecto en español. Santiago de Compostela, Spain: Universidad de Santiago.
White, L.
(
2003)
Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woolford, E.
(
1999)
Animacy hierarchy effects on object agreement. In
P. Kotey (Ed.)
New dimensions in African linguistics and languages (pp. 203–216). Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
Zyzik, E.
(
2006)
Learners’ overgeneralization of dative clitics to accusative contexts: evidence for prototype effects in SLA. In
C. A. Klee and
T. L. Face (Eds.)
Selected proceedings of the 7th conference on the acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as first and second languages (pp. 122–134). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceeding Project.
Zyzik, E.
(
2008)
Null objects in second language acquisition: Grammatical vs. performance models.
Second Language Research, 24(1), 65–110.
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Olsen, Michael K.
2023.
The influence of computer‐assisted obligatory processing tasks on L2 Spanish object pronouns.
Foreign Language Annals 56:3
► pp. 552 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.