Cover not available
Commentary published In:
Epistemological issue with keynote article “Prosodic effects on L2 grammars”
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6] 2019
► pp. 872–877
Commentary

The Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis in the grammar and its treatment of clitics

| Tohoku Gakuin University
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A general question on the model of prosodic representation
  • 3.Questions on some specific issues
    • 3.1The representation of affixal clitics and free clitics
    • 3.2Strong forms of affixal clitics and free clitics
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 8 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19077.nas
References
Chomsky, N.
(1995) The minimalist program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 361, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G.
(1996) The ‘antisymmetric’ programme: Theoretical and typological implications. Journal of Linguistics, 32(2), 447–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, J.
(1994) English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S.
(1994) The antisymmetry of syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D.
(1995) Derivations and interfaces. In J. Durand & F. Katamba (Eds.), Frontiers of phonology: Atoms, structures, derivations (pp. 289–332). Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P.
(1982) From cyclic to Lexical Phonology. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations, vol. I1 (pp. 131–175). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
(1985) Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 21, 83–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kural, M.
(2005) Tree traversal and word order. Linguistic Inquiry, 361, 367–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowenstamm, J.
(1996) CV as the only syllable type. In J. Durand & B. Laks (Eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and methods (pp. 419–442). Salford: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford Publications.Google Scholar
Onuma, H. & K. Nasukawa
(2020) Velar softening without precedence relations. In K. Nasukawa (Ed.), Morpheme-internal recursion in phonology (pp. 201–229). Boston and Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Samuels, B.
(2009) The third factor in phonology. Biolinguistics, 3(2–3), 355–382.Google Scholar
(2011) Phonological architecture: A biolinguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheer, T.
(2004) A lateral theory of phonology: What is CVCV and why should it be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Why the prosodic hierarchy is a diacritic and why the interface must be direct. In J. Hartmann, V. Hegedüs & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology (pp. 145–192). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O.
(1984) Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1996) The prosodic structure of function words. In J. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 187–213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tokizaki, H.
(2018) Externalization, stress and word order. Proceedings of Sophia University Linguistic Society, 321, 18–34.Google Scholar