Commentary
The Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis in the grammar and its treatment of clitics
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A general question on the model of prosodic representation
- 3.Questions on some specific issues
- 3.1The representation of affixal clitics and free clitics
- 3.2Strong forms of affixal clitics and free clitics
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References (18)
References
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 361, 1–22. 

Cinque, G. (1996). The ‘antisymmetric’ programme: Theoretical and typological implications. Journal of Linguistics, 32(2), 447–464. 

Harris, J. (1994). English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kayne, R. S. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kaye, J. D. (1995). Derivations and interfaces. In J. Durand & F. Katamba (Eds.), Frontiers of phonology: Atoms, structures, derivations (pp. 289–332). Harlow, Essex: Longman.
Kiparsky, P. (1982). From cyclic to Lexical Phonology. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations, vol. I1 (pp. 131–175). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Kiparsky, P. (1985). Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 21, 83–138. 

Kural, M. (2005). Tree traversal and word order. Linguistic Inquiry, 361, 367–387. 

Lowenstamm, J. (1996). CV as the only syllable type. In J. Durand & B. Laks (Eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and methods (pp. 419–442). Salford: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford Publications.
Onuma, H. & K. Nasukawa (2020). Velar softening without precedence relations. In K. Nasukawa (Ed.), Morpheme-internal recursion in phonology (pp. 201–229). Boston and Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Samuels, B. (2009). The third factor in phonology. Biolinguistics, 3(2–3), 355–382.
Samuels, B. (2011). Phonological architecture: A biolinguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Scheer, T. (2004). A lateral theory of phonology: What is CVCV and why should it be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Scheer, T. (2008). Why the prosodic hierarchy is a diacritic and why the interface must be direct. In J. Hartmann, V. Hegedüs & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology (pp. 145–192). Oxford: Elsevier.
Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Selkirk, E. O. (1996). The prosodic structure of function words. In J. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 187–213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tokizaki, H. (2018). Externalization, stress and word order. Proceedings of Sophia University Linguistic Society, 321, 18–34.