Commentary published in:
Epistemological issue with keynote article “Prosodic effects on L2 grammars”
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6] 2019
► pp. 867–871

Possible extensions of the Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis

| Florida State University
Published online: 17 October 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19083.mun
References

References

Bullock, B.
(2009) Prosody in contact in French: A case study from a heritage variety in the USA. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 165–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christoph, G. & Kireva, E.
(2014) Prosodic transfer in learner and contact varieties: Speech rhythm and intonation of Buenos Aires Spanish and L2 Castilian Spanish produced by Italian native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(2), 257–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., & Gurlekian, J.
(2004) Convergence and intonation: Historical evidence from Buenos Aires Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 107–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elordieta, G.
(2003) The Spanish intonation of speakers of a Basque pitch-accent dialect. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2, 67–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goad, H. & White, L.
(2009) Prosodic transfer and the representation of determiners in Turkish-English interlanguage. In N. Snape, Y. I. Leung, & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.) Representational deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Prosodic effects on L2 grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goad, H., White, L. & Steele, J.
(2003) Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48, 243–263.Google Scholar
Mennen, I.
(2004) Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 543–563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muntendam, A.
(2018) Cross-linguistic transfer in the prosodic domain: Yes/no- questions in bilingual Quechua and Spanish. Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Muntendam, A. & Torreira, F.
(2016) Focus and prosody in Spanish and Quechua: Insights from an interactive task. In M. Armstrong, N. Henriksen & M. Vanrell (Eds.), Intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across linguistic subfields. (pp. 69–90). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, E.
(2005) Intonation and language contact: A case study of two varieties of Peruvian Spanish. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Queen, R.
(2001) Turkish-German bilinguals and their intonation: Triangulating evidence about contact-induced language change. Language, 88, 791–816. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romera, M., & Elordieta, G.
(2013) Prosodic accommodation in language contact: Spanish intonation in Majorca. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 221, 127–151.Google Scholar
Simonet, M.
(2011) Intonational convergence in language contact: Utterance-final F0 contours in Catalan-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41, 157–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Rijswijk, R., Muntendam, A. & Dijkstra, T.
(2017) Focus marking in Dutch by heritage speakers of Turkish and Dutch L1 speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 61, 48–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. & Nava, E.
(2011) Encoding discourse-based meaning: Prosody vs. syntax: Implications for second language acquisition. Lingua, 121, 625–669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar