The incorporation of new representations into the mental lexicon has raised numerous questions about the organisational principles that govern the process. A number of studies have argued that similarity between the new L3 items and existing representations in the L1 and L2 is the main incorporating force (Hall & Ecke, 2003; Herwig, 2001). Experimental evidence obtained through a primed picture-naming task with L1 Polish-L2 English learners of L3 Russian supports Hall and Ecke’s Parasitic Model of L3 vocabulary acquisition, displaying a significant main effect for both priming and proficiency. These results complement current models of vocabulary acquisition and lexical access in multilingual speakers.
(1999)
Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual’s two lexicons compete for selection?Journal of Memory and Language, 411, 365–397.
Dijkstra, T.
(2003) Lexical processing in bilinguals and multilinguals: The word selection problem. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), The multilingual lexicon (pp. 11–26). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W.J.B.
(1999) Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 411, 496–518.
Dijkstra, A., Van Jaarsveld, H., & Ten Brinke, S.
(1998) Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(1), 51–66.
Dornic, S.
(1980) Language dominance, spare capacity and perceived effort in bilinguals. Ergonomics, 23(4), 369–377.
Falk, Y., & Bardel, C.
(2010) The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition. The state of the art. International Review of Applied Linguistics, IRAL, 451, 185–219.
Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I.
(2004) The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. The International Journal of Multilingualism, 11, 3–16.
Forster, K.I., & Forster, J.C.
(2003) DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 351, 116–124.
García Mayo, M.P.
(2007) Universal Grammar and the acquisition of L3 syntax. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 41, 25–40.
Hall, C.
(2002) The automatic cognate form assumption: Evidence for the parasitic model of vocabulary development. International Review of Applied Linguistics, IRAL, 40(2), 69–87.
Hall, C., & Ecke, P.
(2003) Parasitism as a default mechanism in L3 vocabulary acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), The multilingual lexicon (pp. 71–85). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
Hermans, D., Bongaerts, T., De Bot, K., & Schreuder, R.
(1998) Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(3), 213–229.
Herwig, A.
(2001) Plurilingual lexical organisation: Evidence from lexical processing in L1-L2-L3-L4 translation. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 115–137). Buffalo: Multilingual Matters. Series ‘Bilingual education and bilingualism’, InN.H. Hornberger & C. Baker (Eds.), vol 131.
Levelt, W.J.M.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Likert, R.
(1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes.Archives of Psychology, 1401, 1–55.
Mahon, B.Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K.A., & Caramazza, A.
(2007) Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 331, 503–535.
McClelland, J.L., & Rumelhart, D.E.
(1981)
An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part 1: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–405.
Odlin, T.
(1989) Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paradis, M.
(1985) On the representation of two languages in one brain. Language Sciences, 7(1), 1–39.
Pavlenko, A.
(2009) Preface: Time for new metaphors? In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. xi–xv). Buffalo: Multilingual matters. Series ‘Bilingual education and bilingualism’, edited by Hornberger & Baker.
Ringbom, H.
(1987) The role of the first language in foreign language learning. Clevedon, PH: Multilingual matters.
Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J.
(2010) What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state. Second Language Research, 26(2), 189–218.
Rothman, J., Iverson, M., & Judy, T.
(2011) Some notes on the generative study of L3 acquisition. Second Language Research, 27(1), 5–19.
Cited by
Cited by 10 other publications
Chen, Jianlin
2020. How do L3 words find conceptual parasitic hosts in typologically distant L1 or L2? Evidence from a cross-linguistic priming effect. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23:10 ► pp. 1238 ff.
ECKE, PETER
2015. Parasitic vocabulary acquisition, cross-linguistic influence, and lexical retrieval in multilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18:2 ► pp. 145 ff.
Ecke, Peter & Christopher J. Hall
2021. The Parasitic Model. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 11:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Hall, C. J.
2013. Cognitive Contributions to Plurilithic Views of English and Other Languages. Applied Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
Lago, Sol, Michela Mosca & Anna Stutter Garcia
2021. The Role of Crosslinguistic Influence in Multilingual Processing: Lexicon Versus Syntax. Language Learning 71:S1 ► pp. 163 ff.
Otwinowska, Agnieszka
2023. Cross-linguistic influence and language co-activation in acquiring L3 words: What empirical evidence do we have so far?. Second Language Research
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019. Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer,
Slabakova, Roumyana
2017. The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism 21:6 ► pp. 651 ff.
2020. A Review on the Mechanism of Semantic Access in Trilinguals. Modern Linguistics 08:02 ► pp. 219 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.