Commentary
Variable competence
References (41)
References
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M.H., Croft, W., Ellis, N.C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schonemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system. Position paper. Language Learning, 59(Supplement 1), 1–26.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bock, J.K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 181, 355–387. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bod, R., Hay, J., & Jannedy, S. (Eds.). (2003). Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chipere, N. (2001). Native speaker variations in syntactic competence: Implications for first language teaching. Language Awareness, 101, 107–124. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christiansen, M.H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral & Brain Sciences [target article for multiple peer commentary], 311, 489–509. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, L., & Ellis, N.C. (2009). Input and second language construction learning: frequency, form, and function. Modern Language Journal, 93(2).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dąbrowska, E. (1997). The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics, 351, 735–766. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dąbrowska, E. (2008a). The later development of an early-emerging system: The curious case of the Polish genitive. Linguistics, 461, 629–650. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dąbrowska, E. (2008b). The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 581, 931–951. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dąbrowska, E., & Street, J. (2006). Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 281, 604–615. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Divjak, D.S., & Gries. S.T. (Eds.). (in press). Frequency effects in language: Linguistic representation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ellis, N.C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 271, 305–352. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 1–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C. (2008). Optimizing the input: Frequency and sampling in Usage-based and Formfocussed Learning. In M.H. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C. (2011). Frequency-based accounts of SLA. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 193–210). London: Routledge / Taylor Francis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C., & Cadierno, T. (Eds.). (2009). Constructing a second language (Vol. Special section, 7).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 27(4). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Language as a Complex Adaptive System (Special Issue). Language Learning, 59(Supplement 1), 1–27.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C., & O’Donnell. M.B. (2011). Robust language acquisition — an emergent consequence of language as a complex adaptive system. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3512–3517). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C., & O’Donnell. M.B. (2012). Statistical construction learning: Does a Zipfian problem space ensure robust language learning? In P. Rebuschat & J.N. Williams (Eds.), Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. (1985). A variable competence model of second language acquisition. IRAL, 231, 47–59.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition, (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, N., & Levinson, S.C. (2009). The myth of language universals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 321, 429–492. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gregg, K.R. (1990). The variable competence model of second language acquisition, and why it isn’t. Applied Linguistics, 11(4), 364–381. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, S.T., & Divjak, D.S. (Eds.). (in press). Frequency effects in cognitive linguistics: Statistical effects in learnability, processing and change (Vol. 1). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2008). Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 301, 31–47. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Using priming methods in second language research. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pickering, M.J., & Ferreira, V.S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 1341, 427–459. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pickering, M.J., & Garrod, S.C. (2006). Alignment as the basis for successful communication. Research on Language and Computation, 41, 203–228. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N.C. (Eds.). (2008). A handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slobin, D.I. (1997). The origins of grammaticizable notions: Beyond the individual mind. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 51, pp. 265–323). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Street, J., & Dąbrowska, E., 2010. More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua 1201, 2080–2094. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tarone, E. (1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trousdale, G., & Hoffmann, T. (Eds.). (2012). Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, J.N., & Rebuschat, P. (Eds.). (2012). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Gudmestad, Aarnes, Amanda Edmonds & Thomas Metzger
2020.
Modeling variability in number marking in additional-language Spanish.
Journal of the European Second Language Association 4:1
► pp. 24 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hulstijn, Jan H.
2019.
An Individual‐Differences Framework for Comparing Nonnative With Native Speakers: Perspectives From BLC Theory.
Language Learning 69:S1
► pp. 157 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.