Cover not available
Commentary published In:
Epistemological issue with keynote article “Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment” by Ewa Dabrowska
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2:3] 2012
► pp. 287–292
Commentary

How linguistic performance may differ across speakers

| Utrecht institute of Linguistics OTS
Published online: 7 September 2012
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.09reu
References
Avrutin, S.
(2001) Linguistics and agrammatism. GLOT International, 5(3), 1䂿11.Google Scholar
(2006) Weak Syntax. In K. Amundt & Y. Grodzinsky (Eds.), Broca’s region. Oxford: Oxford Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caha, P.
(2009) Classical Armenian declension. In P. Svenonius, G. Ramchand, M. Starke, & T. Taraldsen (Eds.), Nordlyd (Vol. 361, special issue on Nanosyntax, pp. 77–112). CASTL, Tromsø. Available from [URL]
Chipere, N.
(2001) Native speaker variations in syntactic competence: Implications for first language teaching. Language Awareness, 101, 107–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J.
(1983) The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gold, E. M.
(1967) Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 161, 447–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y., & Reinhart, T.
(1993) The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry, 241, 69–102.Google Scholar
Halle, M.
(1997) Impoverishment and fission. In B. Bruening, Y. Kang, & M. McGinnis (Eds.), Papers at the Interface: MITWPL (Vol. 301, pp. 425–449). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
(1962) Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. In Selected writings (Vol. 21, pp. 23–71). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kolk, H.
(2004) Agrammatism. In Raymond Kent (Ed.), The MIT encyclopedia of communication disorders (pp. 231–233). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koornneef, A.
(2008) Eye-catching anaphora. LOT International Dissertation Series, Utrecht University.
Koornneef, A., Avrutin, S., Wijnen, F., & Reuland, E.
(2011) Tracking the preference for boundvariable dependencies in ambiguous ellipses and only-structures. In J. Runner (Ed.), Experiments at the interfaces (Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 371). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Quine, W.
(1960) Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T.
(2006) Interface strategies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reuland, E.
(2011) Anaphora and language design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Townsend, D., & Bever,T
(2001) Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasić, N.
(2006) Pronoun comprehension in agrammatic aphasia: The structure and use of linguistic knowledge. Doctoral dissertation, LOT, Utrecht University.
Vasić, N., Avrutin, S., & Ruigendijk, E.
(2006) Interpretation of pronouns in VP-ellipsis constructions in Dutch Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 96(2), 191–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K., & Culicover, P.
(1980) Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Koornneef, Arnout & Eric Reuland
2016. On the Shallow Processing (Dis)Advantage: Grammar and Economy. Frontiers in Psychology 7 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2015. Language Proficiency in Native and Non-native Speakers [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 41], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.