Commentary published in:
Epistemological issue with keynote article “Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment” by Ewa Dabrowska[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2:3] 2012
► pp. 298–303
Commentary
Why and how individual differences matter for linguistic theory and experimental research but not for UG
Petra Schulz | Goethe-University Frankfurt
Article outline
- Why and how individual differences matter for linguistic theory
- Why and how individual differences matter for experimental research
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 07 September 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.11sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.11sch
References
Crain, S.
de Villiers. J.G., & de Villiers. P.A
Genesee, F.
Kepser, S., & Reis, M.
Koch, C., Schulz, P., & Katsos, N.
Musolino, J.
Paradis, J.
Penner, Z., & Weissenborn, J.
Schütze, C.T.
Schulz, P., & Kieburg, A.
Schulz, P., & Penner, Z.
Schulz, P., & Roeper, T.
Schulz, P., & Tracy, R.
Stromswold, K.
Stromswold, K., Pinker, S., & Kaplan, R.
(1985) Cues for understanding the passive voice. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 241, 123–130.
Tracy, R., & Gawlitzek-Maiwald, I.
van der Lely. H.K.J.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Schulz, Petra & Angela Grimm
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.