Brady, S., Braze, D., & Fowler, C.
(2011) Explaining individual differences in reading: Theory and evidence. New York: Psychology Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, A., & Stanovich, K.
(1997) Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 331, 934–945. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) What reading does for the mind. American Educator, Spring/Summer1, 1–8.Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T.
(1995) Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Hayes, D.
(1988) Speaking and writing: Distinct patterns of word choice. Journal of Memory and Language, 271, 572–585. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W., Herman, P., & Anderson, R.
(1985) Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 201, 233–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1989) Individual differences in second language learning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Ducroquet, L.
(1988) A comparison of first and foreign language ability. Working Documents No. 8. ESOL Department, Institute of Education, London University.Google Scholar
Snowling, M., & Hulme, C.
(2007) The science of reading: A handbook. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N.
(2009) Long-term cross linguistic transfer of skills from L1 to L2. Language Learning, 591, 203–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
in press-a). Do L1 reading achievement and L1 print exposure contribute to the prediction of L2 proficiency? Language Learning.
in press-b). Relationships among L1 print exposure and early L1 literacy skills, L2 aptitude, and L2 proficiency. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
Stanovich, K.
(2000) Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Street, James A.
2017. This is the native speaker that the non-native speaker outperformed: Individual, education-related differences in the processing and interpretation of Object Relative Clauses by native and non-native speakers of English. Language Sciences 59  pp. 192 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.