Commentary
Individual differences in L1 achievement impact L2 learning
References (13)
Brady, S., Braze, D., & Fowler, C.
(
2011)
Explaining individual differences in reading: Theory and evidence. New York: Psychology Press.
Cunningham, A., & Stanovich, K.
(
1997)
Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading ability 10 years later.
Developmental Psychology, 331, 934–945.
Cunningham, A., & Stanovich, K.
(
1998)
What reading does for the mind.
American Educator, Spring/Summer1, 1–8.
Hart, B., & Risley, T.
(
1995)
Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Hayes, D.
(
1988)
Speaking and writing: Distinct patterns of word choice.
Journal of Memory and Language, 271, 572–585.
Nagy, W., Herman, P., & Anderson, R.
(
1985)
Learning words from context.
Reading Research Quarterly, 201, 233–253.
Skehan, P.
(
1989)
Individual differences in second language learning. London: Arnold.
Skehan, P., & Ducroquet, L.
(
1988)
A comparison of first and foreign language ability.
Working Documents No. 8. ESOL Department, Institute of Education, London University.
Snowling, M., & Hulme, C.
(
2007)
The science of reading: A handbook. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N.
(
2009)
Long-term cross linguistic transfer of skills from L1 to L2.
Language Learning, 591, 203–243.
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N.
in press-a).
Do L1 reading achievement and L1 print exposure contribute to the prediction of L2 proficiency? Language Learning.
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N.
in press-b).
Relationships among L1 print exposure and early L1 literacy skills, L2 aptitude, and L2 proficiency.
Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
Stanovich, K.
(
2000)
Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Street, James A.
2017.
This is the native speaker that the non-native speaker outperformed: Individual, education-related differences in the processing and interpretation of Object Relative Clauses by native and non-native speakers of English.
Language Sciences 59
► pp. 192 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.