Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 13:4 (2023) ► pp.576–606

Asymmetric transfer and development of temporal-aspectual sentence-final particles in English-Cantonese bilinguals’ L3 Mandarin grammars

ORCID logo | University College Cork
ORCID logo | Shanghai Jiao Tong University | University of Cambridge
Aiming to shed new light on the discussion on transfer at initial stages of third language (L3) acquisition and development at later stages, this article reports on an empirical study of L3 acquisition of Mandarin temporal-aspectual sentence-final particles (SFPs) le, ne and láizhe by English speaking and English-Cantonese bilingual learners, at both low and high proficiency levels. Cantonese is typologically and structurally closer to Mandarin than English is. Our findings show obvious facilitative effects on le by its Cantonese counterpart in English-Cantonese bilingual learners’ L3 Mandarin, which supports the L3 models that advocate the deterministic role of structural similarity in the transfer source selection. A transfer asymmetry is observed between the cases of le and láizhe. No transfer effects are found in the L3 Mandarin data of láizhe, even though it has an equivalent SFP in Cantonese. This discrepancy is argued to be attributable to input factors and misleading forms. Moreover, patterns observed over different proficiency levels indicate that the quality and quantity of input and the register property of a particular SFP can greatly affect initial transfer and later development of L3 acquisition.
Keywords: L3 transfer, L3 development, Mandarin, sentence-final particles
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Main themes of current L models and influential factors involved
    • 1.1The order of acquisition vs. the structural similarity
    • 1.2What and when to transfer
    • 1.3Other factors?
  • 2.Mandarin SFPs le, ne and laizhe and the (un)availability of their counterparts in Cantonese and English
    • 2.1The SFP le
    • 2.2The SFP láizhe
    • 2.3The SFP ne
  • 3.The study
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Instrument and procedure
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Results of le
    • 4.2Results of láizhe
    • 4.3Results of ne
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Transfer source selection at L early stages
    • 5.2Transfer asymmetry: The effect of input and misleading forms
    • 5.3Important factors in L development
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.20116.guo
References (40)
References
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23 1, 459–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Behind the L status factor: A neurolinguistic framework for L research. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, S. Flynn, & J. Rothman, (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 61–78). John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7.Google Scholar
Cheung, H. N. (2018). yuán zì hé lái: zǎo qī yuè yǔ zhōng “lei4 ”de lái qù zōng jì [The origin of the Cantonese Lei4], Current Research in Chinese Linguistics, 97 (1), 17–39.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö., & Velupillai, V. (2008). The past tense. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (Eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (chap. 66). Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar
Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. The International Journal of Multilingualism, 1 1, 3–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fung, S. Y. (2000). Final particles in standard Cantonese: Semantic extension and pragmatic inference. The Ohio State University Ph.D. dissertation.
Guo, Y., & Yuan, B. (2020). Facilitative transfer only?: L acquisition of Mandarin sentence-final particle clusters by English-Cantonese bilinguals. Journal of Second Language Studies, 3 (2), 261–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermas, A. (2010). Language acquisition as computational resetting: verb movement in L initial state. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7 (4), 202–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jin, F. (2009). Third language acquisition of Norwegian objects: Interlanguage transfer or L1 influence? In Y. Leung (Ed.), Third language acquisition and universal grammar (pp.144–161). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwok, H. (1984). Sentence particles in Cantonese. Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Lee, T. H. T., & Yiu, C. (1998). Focus and aspect in the Cantonese final particle “lei4”. 5th Annual Research Forum of YR Chao Centre for Chinese Linguistics, University of California.Google Scholar
Leung, C. S. (1992). A study of the utterance particles in Cantonese as spoken in Hong Kong (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hong Kong Polytechnic.
Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1989). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, S., & Yip, V. (1994). Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge.Google Scholar
Meyer, D., Zeileis, A. & Hornik, K. (2017). vcd: Visualizing Categorical Data. R package version 1.4-4.Google Scholar
Na Ranong, S., & Leung, Y. (2009). Null objects in L1 Thai-L English-L Chinese: An empirical take on a theoretical problem. In Y. Leung (Ed.), Third language acquisition and universal grammar (pp. 162–191). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A., & Lidz, J. (2015). Linking parser development to acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition, 22 (2), 158–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, W. (2015). New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281–337). Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. (2011). L syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research, 27 1, 107–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Linguistic and cognitive motivation for the typological primacy model of third language (L) transfer: Considering the role of timing of acquisition and proficiency in the previous languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (2), 179–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., González Alonso, J., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2019). Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R. (2018). The generative approach to SLA and its place in modern second language studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40 (2), 417–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L cognitive states and the full transfer/full access hypothesis. Second Language Research, 12 (1), 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (2021). The full transfer/full access model and L cognitive states. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11 (1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2008). Meaning in the second language. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., & García Mayo, M. P. (2015). The L syntax-discourse interface. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (2), 208–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2017). The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21 (6), 651–665. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. (2005). Time with and without tense. The International Round Table on Tense and Modality. Paris.Google Scholar
Song, Y. Z. (1981). Guānyú shíjiān zhùcí de hé láizhe [On the tense particles de and láizhe]. Zhongguo Yuwen, 4 1, 271–276.Google Scholar
Sybesma, R. (2004). Exploring Cantonese tense. In L. Cornips & J. Doetjes (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands (pp. 169–180). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, S. W. (2015). Lectures on Cantonese grammar. The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4 (1), 105–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M. (2019). Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Second Language Research, 37 (3), 379–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). L acquisition and crosslinguistic influence as co-activation: Response to commentaries on the keynote ‘Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition’. Second Language Research, 37 (3), 501–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y. (2017). Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The linguistic proximity model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21 1, 666–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeileis, A., Meyer, D., & Hornik, K. (2007). Residual-based shadings for visualizing (conditional) independence. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 16 (3), 507–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, D. (1982). Yǔfǎ jiǎngyì [On grammar]. The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Guo, Yanyu & Boping Yuan
2024. How does a structurally similar background language influence L3 grammars? A study on the syntax of L2/L3 Mandarin [SI 21/3]. International Journal of Multilingualism ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Lilong & Boping Yuan
2024. What looks native-like may not necessarily be native-like. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:6 ► pp. 856 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.