Variation versus deviation
Early bilingual acquisition of Spanish Differential Object Marking
Naturalistic production research has reported that, unlike monolingual peers, children acquiring Spanish as a
heritage language omit Differential Object Marking (DOM) with animate objects since the earliest stages of language development.
However, the previous studies investigating longitudinal monolingual and bilingual corpora cannot be compared to each other given
their different treatment of language-internal variation in DOM use along the animacy scale. Whereas monolingual results excluded
contexts predicted to be variable, bilingual results combined them with categorical contexts increasing the rate of “errors” in
the bilingual group. This study reexamines naturalistic production by monolingual and early bilingual children as well as by their
caregivers using a common methodology that distinguishes categorical from variable DOM contexts. The results indicate that
longitudinal corpora covering child heritage speakers’ development up to age three do not show evidence of greater omission of DOM
compared to monolingual children once variability along the animacy scale is accounted for. By contrast, young monolingual and
bilingual children’s use of Spanish DOM seems target-like based on their input.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1Spanish DOM
- 2.1.1The differential and living nature of object marking in modern Spanish
- 2.1.2A formalization of the use of DOM across contexts
- 2.1.3Variation in Spanish DOM with nonhuman animate DOs
- 2.2Spanish DOM: Adult HS use and acquisition by children
- 2.2.1Divergence in DOM use between monolingual and heritage adult speakers
- 2.2.2Monolingual and bilingual children’s early acquisition of DOM
- 3.The present study
- 3.1Case studies data
- 3.2Procedure
- 3.3Results
- 3.3.1Monolingual children
- 3.3.2Bilingual children exposed to only Spanish in the home
- 3.3.3Bilingual children exposed to Spanish and English in the home
- 4.Discussion
- 4.1Lack of group differences in early DOM use
- 4.2Variation in the input with nonhuman animate DOs and innovative uses
- Notes
-
References
References
Aissen, J.
(
2003)
Differential
object marking: Iconicity vs. economy.
Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory,
21
(3), 435–483.
Arechabaleta Regulez, B., & Montrul, S.
(
2021)
Psycholinguistic
evidence for incipient language change in Mexican Spanish: The extension of differential object
marking.
Languages,
6
(3), 131.
Balasch, S.
(
2011)
Factors
determining Spanish differential object marking within its domain of
variation. In
J. Michnowicz &
R. Dodsworth (Eds.),
Selected
proceedings of the 5th workshop on Spanish
sociolinguistics (pp. 113–124). Cascadilla Press.
Bryant, F. E.
(
1907)
On
the conservatism of language in a new country.
Publications of the Modern Language Association
of
America,
22
1, 277–290.
Callen, C. M., & Miller, K.
(
2021)
Linguistic
variation in the acquisition of morphosyntax: Variable object marking in the speech of Mexican children and their
caregivers.
Language Learning and Development.
Chamorro, G., Sturt, P., & Sorace, A.
(
2016)
Selectivity
in L1 attrition: Differential object marking in Spanish near-native speakers of
English.
Journal of psycholinguistic
research,
45
(3), 697–715.
Comrie, B.
(
1986)
Markedness,
grammar, people, and the world. In
F. Eckman,
E. Moravcsik &
J. Wirth (Eds.),
Markedness (pp. 85–106). Plenum Press.
Croft, W.
(
1988)
Agreement
vs. case marking and direct objects. In
M. Barlow &
C. Ferguson (Eds.),
Agreement
in natural language: Approaches, theories,
descriptions (pp. 159–179). CSLI.
Deuchar, M., & Quay, S.
(
2000)
Bilingual
acquisition: Theoretical implications of a case study. Oxford University Press.
Elsig, M., & Poplack, S.
(
2006)
Transplanted
dialects and language change: Question formation in Québec.
University of Pennsylvania Working
Papers in
Linguistics,
12
(2), 8.
Fábregas, A.
(
2013)
Differential
object marking in Spanish: State of the art.
Borealis–An International Journal of Hispanic
Linguistics,
2
(2), 1–80.
Flores, C., & Rinke, E.
(
2020)
The
relevance of language-internal variation in predicting heritage language
grammars.
Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition,
23
(1), 25–26.
von Heusinger, K.
(
2008)
Verbal
semantics and the diachronic development of differential object marking in
Spanish.
Probus,
20
(1), 1–31.
von Heusinger, K., & Garcia, M.
(
2021,
August 30–31).
Differential
object marking and discourse prominence in Spanish [Workshop
session]. 54th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica
Europaea, Athens.
[URL]
Hurtado, A. & Vega, L.
(
2004)
Shift
happens: Spanish and English transmission between parents and their children.
Journal of Social
Issues 601, 187–155.
Krause, E., & Roberts, L.
Leonetti, M.
(
2004)
Specificity
and differential object marking in Spanish.
Catalan Journal of
Linguistics,
3
(1), 75–114.
Liceras, J. M., Fuertes, R. F., Perales, S., Pérez-Tattam, R., & Spradlin, K. T.
(
2008)
Gender
and gender agreement in bilingual native and non-native grammars: A view from child and adult functional–lexical
mixings.
Lingua,
118
(6), 827–851.
Lizárraga-Navarro, G. Z., & Mora-Bustos, A.
(
2010)
Variación
en la marcación diferenciada de objeto en español (‘Variation in differential object marking in
Spanish’).
Forma y
Función,
23
(1), 9–38.
López, L.
(
2012)
Indefinite
objects: Scrambling, choice functions and differential marking. MIT Press.
MacWhinney, B.
(
2000)
The
CHILDES project: The
database (Vol. 21). Psychology Press.
Montes, R. G.
(
1992)
Achieving
understanding: Repair mechanisms in mother–child conversations. [Unpublished doctoral
dissertation]. Georgetown University.
Montrul, S.
(
2002)
Incomplete
acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult
bilinguals.
Bilingualism,
5
(1), 39.
Montrul, S.
(
2004)
Subject
and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morpho-syntactic
convergence.
Bilingualism, Language and
Cognition,
7
(2), 125–142.
Montrul, S., & Bowles, M.
(
2009)
Back
to basics: Differential object marking under incomplete acquisition in Spanish heritage
speakers.
Bilingualism,
12
(3), 363–383.
Montrul, S., & Sánchez-Walker, N.
(
2013)
Differential
object marking in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers.
Language
Acquisition,
20
(2), 109–132.
Pérez-Bazán, M. J.
(
2002)
Predicting
early bilingual development: Towards a probabilistic model of analysis. [Unpublished doctoral
dissertation]. University of Michigan.
Polinsky, M., & Kagan, O.
(
2007)
Heritage
languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom.
Language and linguistics
compass,
1
(5), 368–395.
Polinsky, M., & Scontras, G.
(
2020)
A
roadmap for heritage language research.
Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition,
23
(1), 50–55.
Remedi, V.
(
2014)
Creación
de corpus de datos sobre estudio longitudinal de adquisición de lenguaje de una niña de la región central de
Argentina. [Unpublished thesis, National University of Cordoba].
Rodina, Y., Kupisch, T., Meir, N., Mitrofanova, N., Urek, O., & Westergaard, M.
(
2020)
Internal
and external factors in heritage language acquisition: evidence from heritage Russian in Israel, Germany, Norway, Latvia and
the United Kingdom.
Frontiers in
Education,
5
1, 1–17.
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M.
(
2008)
The
acquisition of differential object marking in
Spanish.
Probus,
20
(1), 111–145.
Silva-Corvalán, C.
(
1986)
Bilingualism
and language change: The extension of estar in Los Angeles
Spanish.
Language,
62
(3), 587–608.
Silva-Corvalán, C.
(
1994)
The
gradual loss of mood distinctions in Los Angeles Spanish.
Language variation and
change,
6
(3), 255–272.
Ticio, E., & Avram, L.
(
2015)
The
acquisition of differential object marking in Spanish and Romanian: Semantic scales or semantic
features? Revue Roumaine de Linguistique-Romanian Review of
Linguistics,
60
(4), 383–401.
Tippets, I.
(
2011)
Differential
object marking: Quantitative evidence for underlying hierarchical constraints across Spanish
dialects. In
L. Ortiz-López (Ed.),
Selected
proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics
Symposium (pp. 107–117). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Torrego, E.
(
1998)
The
dependency of objects. MIT Press.
Weinreich, U., Herzog, M., & Labov, W.
(
1968)
Empirical
foundations for a theory of language change. In
W. P. Lehmann &
Y. Malkiel (Eds.),
Directions
for historical
linguistics (pp. 97–195). University of Texas Press.
Weissenrieder, M.
(
1990)
Variable
uses of the direct-object marker
A.
Hispania,
73
(1), 223–231.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Shin, Naomi
2022.
Structured variation in child heritage speakers' grammars.
Language and Linguistics Compass 16:12
Shin, Naomi, Alejandro Cuza & Liliana Sánchez
2023.
Structured variation, language experience, and crosslinguistic influence shape child heritage speakers’ Spanish direct objects.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 26:2
► pp. 317 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.