Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism: Online-First Articles

The acquisition of consonant clusters and word stress by early second language learners of German

Evidence for cross-linguistic influence?

ORCID logo | University of Frankfurt
ORCID logo | University of Marburg
This study compared word-prosodic abilities of early second language learners (eL2) and monolingual learners of German. We examined the production of word-initial and word-final clusters and the placement of stress and analyzed potential effects of cross-linguistic influence (CLI). Monolingual German-speaking children (n = 38) and eL2-learners of German (n = 26; age of onset to German 24 to 41 months) aged between 53 and 60 months completed a pseudoword repetition task following the metrical and phonotactic constraints of German. We collected background information via parental questionnaires. The eL2-learners acquired 12 different L1s. To explore the effects of CLI, we grouped the heritage languages by the number of consonants permitted in word-initial and word-final position, the segmental make-up of clusters, and stress patterns. The production accuracy of word-initial clusters and word stress was very high, indicating a high degree of maturation and showing no effects of CLI. In contrast, the production accuracy of word-final clusters was lower and effects of CLI were found, presumably related to smaller sonority distances compared to word-initial clusters. The study contributes empirically to the under-investigated area of eL2 word-prosodic development.
Keywords: child second language learners, production of word stress, cross-linguistic interaction, German, production of consonant clusters
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Phonological properties of clusters and word stress
    • 2.1Consonant clusters
    • 2.2Word stress
  • 3.The development of consonant clusters and word stress in monolingual and bilingual children
    • 3.1Cross-linguistic influences in bilingual phonological acquisition
    • 3.2Acquisition of consonant clusters
    • 3.3Acquisition of word stress
    • 3.4Summary of previous findings and open questions
  • 4.Predictions
    • 4.1Crosslinguistic interaction: Predictions for word-initial consonant clusters
    • 4.2Crosslinguistic interaction: Predictions for word-final consonant clusters
    • 4.3Crosslinguistic interaction: Predictions for stress shifts
    • 4.4Predictions regarding the connection of CLI and maturation
  • 5.Method
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2Material
    • 5.3Procedure
    • 5.4Data transcription
    • 5.5Data coding
    • 5.6Statistical analysis
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Monolingual vs. eL2-learners
    • 6.2Cross-linguistic interaction: Word-initial clusters
    • 6.3Cross-linguistic interaction: Word-final clusters
    • 6.4Cross-linguistic interaction: Stress shifts
  • 7.Discussion
    • 7.1Consonant clusters
    • 7.2Stress shifts
  • 8.Conclusions
  • Data availability statement
  • Conflict of interest statement
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 11 December 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.21026.gri
References (62)
References
Altmann, H. (2006). The perception and production of second language stress: A cross-linguistic study [PhD Dissertation], Stuttgart. [URL]
Arias, J., & Lleó, C. (2009). Comparing the representation of iambs by monolingual German, monolingual Spanish and bilingual German-Spanish children. In K. Braunmüller & J. House (Eds.), Convergence and divergence in language contact situations (pp. 205–234). Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, W., Trofimovich, P., Flege, J. E., Mack, M., & Halter, R. (2008). Child-adult differences in second-language phonological learning: The role of cross-language similarity. Language and Speech, 51 (4), 317–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barlow, J. A. (2016). Sonority in acquisition: A review. In M. J. Ball & N. Müller (Eds.), Studies in Phonetics and Phonology. Challenging sonority: Cross-linguistic evidence (pp. 295–336). Equinox.Google Scholar
Bunta, F., & Ingram, D. (2007). The acquisition of speech rhythm by bilingual spanish- and english-speaking 4- and 5-year-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50 (4), 999–1014. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clausen, M. C., & Fox-Boyer, A. (2017). Phonological development of Danish-speaking children: A normative cross-sectional study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 31 (6), 440–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Almeida, L., Ferré, S., Morin, E., Prévost, P., dos Santos, C., Tuller, L. et al. (2017). Language Impairment in Bilingual Children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7 (3–4), 331–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Almeida, L., Ferré, S., Barthez, M. A., & dos Santos, C. (2019). What do monolingual and bilingual children with and without SLI produce when phonology is too complex? First Language, 39 (2), 158–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K., & Fee, J. (1995). Minimal prosodic words in early phonological development. Ms, Brown University and Dalhousie University.Google Scholar
Demuth, K., & Kehoe, M. M. (2006). The acquisition of word-final clusters in French. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 5 1, 59–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Domahs, U., Genc, S., Knaus, J., Wiese, R., & Kabak, B. (2013). Processing (un-)predictable word stress: ERP evidence from Turkish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28 (3), 335–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110 1, 1606–1618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elsen, H. (1991). Erstspracherwerb: Der Erwerb des deutschen Lautsystems. Deutscher Universitätsverlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fabiano-Smith, L., & Goldstein, B. A. (2010). Phonological acquisition in bilingual Spanish–English speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53 1, 160–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Féry, C. (2004). Phonologie des Deutschen: Eine optimalitätstheoretische Einführung. Linguistics in Potsdam: Vol. 7. Universitäts-Verlag.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. HIL dissertations: Vol. 61. ICG Printing.
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In: Strange, W. (ed)., Speech perception and linguistic experience. Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). York Press.Google Scholar
Fox, A. V., & Dodd, B. (1999). Der Erwerb des phonologischen Systems in der deutschen Sprache. Sprache Stimme Gehör, 23 1, 183–191.Google Scholar
Fox-Boyer, A. (2016). Kindliche Aussprachestörungen: Phonologischer Erwerb, Differenzialdiagnostik, Therapie. Schulz-Kirchner.Google Scholar
Fox-Boyer, A., Fricke, S., & Albrecht, K. M. (2020). Phonologische Prozesse in der deutschen Sprache türkisch-deutsch bilingualer Kinder. Sprache Stimme Gehör, 44 (04), 216–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giegerich, H. J. (2009). Metrical phonology and phonological structure: German and English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gildersleeve-Neumann, C. E., Kester, E. S., Davis, B. L., & Peña, E. D. (2008). English speech sound development in preschool-aged children from bilingual English–Spanish environments. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39 (3), 314–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, B. A., Fabiano, L., & Washington, P. S. (2005). Phonological skills in predominantly English-speaking, predominantly Spanish-speaking, and Spanish-English bilingual children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36 (3), 201–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, B. A., & Washington, P. S. (2001). An initial investigation of phonological patterns in typically developing 4-year-old Spanish-English bilingual children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32 1, 153–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimm, A. (2010). The development of early prosodic word structure in child German: Simplex words and compounds. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Potsdam. [URL]
Grimm, A. & Schulz, P. (2014). Specific language impairment and early second language acquisition: The risk of over- and underdiagnosis. Child Indicator Research 7 (4), 821–841. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. A. (1992). Syllable structure and syllable- related processes in German. De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holm, A., & Dodd, B. (1999). A longitudinal study of the phonological development of two Cantonese–English bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20 (3), 349–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holm, A., Dodd, B., Stow, C., & Pert, S. (1999). Identification and differential diagnosis of phonological disorder in bilingual children. Language Testing, 16 (3), 271–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keffala, B., Barlow, J. A., & Rose, S. (2018). Interaction in Spanish–English bilinguals’ acquisition of syllable structure. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22 (1), 16–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, M. M. (2015). Cross-linguistic interaction: A retrospective and prospective view. In E. Barbatsouli & D. Ingram (Eds.), Proceedings of the international symposium of monolingual and bilingual speech 2015 (pp. 141–167). [URL]
Kehoe, M. M., & Girardier, C. (2020). What factors influence phonological production in French-speaking bilingual children, aged three to six years? Journal of Child Language, 47 (5), 945–981. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, M. M., & Havy, M. (2019). Bilingual phonological acquisition: The influence of language-internal, language-external, and lexical factors. Journal of Child Language, 46 1, 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, M. M., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1997). The acquisition of prosodic structure: An investigation of current accounts of children’s prosodic development. Language, 73 (1), 113–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keshavarz, M. H., & Ingram, D. (2002). The early phonological development of a bilingual Farsi-English child. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6 (3), 255–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirk, C., & Demuth, K. (2005). Asymmetries in the acquisition of word-initial and word-final consonant clusters. Journal of Child Language, 32 (4), 709–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1995). Einführung in die Phonetik des Deutschen. Schmidt.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, J. (2013). Turkish. Descriptive Grammars. Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Lausecker, A., Grimm, A., & Schulz, P. (2021). Der Erwerb der Wortbetonungsregeln im frühen Zweitspracherwerb des Deutschen. In A.-L. Scherger, B. Lütke, Montanari, Elke, A. Müller, & J. Richard-Brede (Eds.), Deutsch als Zweitsprache – Forschungsfelder und Ergebnisse. (pp. 163–183). Fillibach bei Klett.Google Scholar
Lleó, C. (2006). The acquisition of prosodic word structures in Spanish by monolingual and Spanish-German bilingual children. Language and Speech, 49 (2), 205–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C., & Prinz, M. (1996). Consonant clusters in child phonology and the directionality of syllable structure assignment. Journal of Child Language, 23 (1), 31–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. R., Harris, J., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2003). The nature of phonological representations in children with Grammatical-Specific Language Impairment. In D. Hall, T. Markopoulos, A. Salamoura, & S. Skoufaki (Eds.), The University of Cambridge First Postgraduate Conference in Language Research (pp. 511–517). Cambridge Institute of Language Research.Google Scholar
Mayr, R., Howells, G., & Lewis, R. (2015). Asymmetries in phonological development: The case of word-final cluster acquisition in Welsh-English bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 42 (1), 146–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayr, R., Jones, D., & Mennen, I. (2014). 1. Speech learning in bilinguals: Consonant cluster acquisition. In E. M. Thomas & I. Mennen (Eds.), Advances in the Study of Bilingualism (pp. 3–24). Channel View Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLeod, S., van Doorn, J., & Reed, V. A. (2001). Normal acquisition of consonant clusters. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10 (2), 99–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mok, P. P. (2011). The acquisition of speech rhythm by three-year-old bilingual and monolingual children: Cantonese and English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14 (4), 458–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mołczanow, J., Iskra, E., Dragoy, O., Wiese, R., & Domahs, U. (2019). Default stress assignment in Russian: evidence from acquired surface dyslexia. Phonology, 36 (1), 61–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morrow, A., Goldstein, B. A., Gilhool, A., & Paradis, J. (2014). Phonological skills in English language learners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45 (1), 26–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2001). Do bilingual two-year-olds have separate phonological systems? International Journal of Bilingualism, 5 (1), 19–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., & Genesee, F. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 (1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Genesee, F., & Crago, M. B. (Eds.). (2011). Dual language development and disorders: A handbook on bilingualism and second language learning. Communication and language intervention series: Vol. 11. Brookes.Google Scholar
Pater, J., & Barlow, J. A. (2003). Constraint conflict in cluster reduction. Journal of Child Language, 30 (3), 487–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salameh, E. K., Nettelbladt, U., & Norlin, K. (2003). Assessing phonologies in bilingual Swedish-Arabic children with and without language impairment. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 19 (3), 338–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulz, P., & Tracy, R. (2011). LiSe-DaZ – Linguistische Sprachstandserfassung Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Sorenson Duncan, T., & Paradis, J. (2016). English language learners’ nonword repetition performance: The influence of age, L2 vocabulary size, length of L2 exposure, and L1 phonology. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59 (1), 39–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamburelli, M., Sanoudaki, E., Jones, G., & Sowinska, M. (2015). Acceleration in the bilingual acquisition of phonological structure: Evidence from Polish–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (4), 713–725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tessier, A. M., Sorensen Duncan, T., & Paradis, J. (2013). Developmental trends and L1 effects in early L2 learners’ onset cluster production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16 (3), 663–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Hulst, H., & Ritter, N. (2012). Theories of the syllable. In H. van der Hulst & N. Ritter (Eds.), Studies in Generative Grammar, Vol. 45. The Syllable: Views and Facts (pp. 13–52). De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Verhagen, J. & Andringa, S. (2023). The role of existing language knowledge in bilingual and multilingual toddlers’ repetition of cross-linguistic and languagespecific nonwords. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13 (3), 315–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiese, R. (1996). The phonology of German. Clarendon.Google Scholar
Zembrzuski, D., Marecka, M., Otwinowska, A., Zajbt, E., Krzemiński, M., Szewczyk, J., & Wodniecka, Z. (2020). Bilingual children do not transfer stress patterns: Evidence from suprasegmental and segmental analysis of L1 and L2 speech of Polish–English child bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24 (2), 93–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar