Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 14:2 (2024) ► pp.147–177

L2 tolerance of pragmatic violations of informativeness

Evidence from ad hoc implicatures and contrastive inference

ORCID logo | Peking University

This study sets out to investigate second language (L2) speakers’ derivation of pragmatic inferences and tolerance of violations of informativeness in two types of inferences, i.e., ad hoc implicatures and contrastive inference. The results of a graded judgment task revealed that pragmatic tolerance is inference-specific: L2 speakers were overly tolerant of underinformative statements in ad hoc implicatures than in contrastive inference. In addition, L2 speakers were found to be more relaxed with overinformativeness than underinformativeness in contrastive inference. The fact that L2 speakers tend to be redundant (overinformative) than ambiguous (underinformative) is further discussed with the Pragmatic Principles Violation Hypothesis (Lozano, 2016). This study hopes to contribute to a more find-grained understanding of L2 speakers’ abilities of deriving pragmatic inferences.

Keywords: pragmatic tolerance, ad hoc implicatures, contrastive inference, underinformative, overinformative
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Native speakers’ processing of ad hoc implicatures and contrastive inference
  • 3.L2 acquisition of implicatures and referential expressions
  • 4.The present study
    • 4.1Research questions
    • 4.2Test design and materials
    • 4.3Participants and procedures
    • 4.4Data analysis
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 June 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.21064.fen
References
Alonso-Ovalle, L., Fernandez-Solera, S., Frazier, L., & Clifton, C.
(2002) Null vs. overt pronouns and the topic-focus articulation in Spanish. Journal of Italian Linguistics, 14 (2), 151–169.Google Scholar
Antoniou, K., & Katsos, N.
(2017) The effect of childhood multilingualism and bilectalism on implicature understand. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38 1, 787–833. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antoniou, K., Veenstra, A., Kissine, M., & Katsos, N.
(2019) How does childhood bilingualism and bi-dialectalism affect the interpretation and processing of pragmatic meanings? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23 (1), 186–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arts, A.
(2004) Overspecification in instructive texts. Doctoral dissertation, Tillburg University.
Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A.
(2011) Accessing the unsaid: the role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition, 118 (1), 84–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E.
(2001) The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism Development Disorder, 31 1, 5–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H.
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bel, A., & Garcia-Alcaraz, E.
(2015) Subject pronouns in the L2 Spanish of Moroccan Arabic speakers. In T. Judy and S. Perpinan (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish in understudied language pairings (pp. 201–232). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bel, A., Sagarra, N., Cominguez, J. P., & Garcia-Alcaraz, E.
(2016) Transfer and proficiency effects in L2 processing of subject anaphora. Lingua, 184 1, 134–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belke, E.
(2006) Visual determinants of preferred adjective order. Visual Cognition, 14 1, 261–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bott, L., Bailey, T. M., & Grodner, D.
(2012) Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures. Journal of Memory and Language, 66 1, 123–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bott, L. & Noveck, I. A.
(2004) Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course o scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 51 1, 437–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breheny, R., Ferguson, H. J., & Katsos, N.
(2013) Investigating the timecourse of accessing conversational implicatures during incremental sentence interpretation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28 (4), 443–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breheny, R., Katsos, N., & Williams, J. N.
(2006) Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition, 100 (3), 434–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, R.
(1998) Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications (pp. 179–236). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G.
(2006) Broaden your views: Implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language. Linguistic Inquiry, 37 1, 535–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G., Fox, D., & Spector, B.
(2012) Scalar implicature as a grammatical phenomenon. In P. Portner, C. Maienborn, & K. von Heusinger (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (pp. 2297–2331). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Christensen, R. H. B.
(2019) Ordinal: Regression Models for Ordinal Data. R package version 2019, 12–10.Google Scholar
Clements, M., & Domínguez, L.
(2017) Reexamining the acquisition of null subject pronouns in a second language: Focus on referential and pragmatic constraints. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7 (1), 33–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contemori, C., & Dussias, P. E.
(2016) Referential choice in a second language: Evidence for a listener-oriented approach. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31 (10), 1257–1272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crosthwaite, P.
(2014) Definite discourse-new reference in L1 and L2: A study of bridging in Mandarin, Korean, and English. Language Learning, 64 (3), 456–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cunnings, I., Fotiadou, G., & Tsimpli, I. M.
(2017) Anaphora resolution and reanalysis during L2 sentence processing: Evidence from the visual world paradigm. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39 1, 621–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, C., & Katsos, N.
(2010) Over-informative children: Production/comprehension asymmetry or tolerance to pragmatic violations? Lingua, 120 1, 1956–1972. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degen, J., & Tanenhaus, M. K.
(2011) Making inference: The case of scalar implicature processing. In L. A. Carlson, C. Holscher & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 3299–3304.Google Scholar
(2015) Processing scalar implicature: A constraint-based approach. Cognitive science, 39 (4), 667–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, B.
(2012) Syntax and discourse in near-native French: clefts and focus. Language Learning 62 1, 902–930. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekiert, M.
(2010) Linguistic effects on thinking for writing: The case of articles in L2 English. In Z. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking (pp. 125–153). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, P. E., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferreira, F.
(2006) Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean maxim of quantity? Journal of Memory and Language, 54 1, 554–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, P. E., Demiral, S. B., & Ferreira, F.
(2011) Over-specified referring expressions impair comprehension: An ERP study. Brain and Cognition, 77 1, 304–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feeney, A., Scrafton, S., Duckworth, A., & Handley, S. J.
(2004) The story of some: Everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58 (2), 121–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feng, S.
under review). L2 speakers’ tolerance of pragmatic violations in interpreting scalar implicatures.
Foppolo, F., Mazzaggio, G., Panzeri, F., & Surian, L.
(2020) Scalar and ad hoc pragmatic inferences in children: guess which one is easier. Journal of Child Language, 48 (2), 350–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In: Davidson, D. and Harman, G. (Eds.), The logic of grammar (pp. 64–75). Encino, CA: Dickenson.Google Scholar
(1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L.
(2005) Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20 1, 667–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, L.
(1972) On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Bloomington, USA.
Horowitz, A. C., Schneider, R. M., & Frank, M. C.
(2018) The trouble with quantifiers: Exploring children’s deficits in scalar implicature. Children Development, 89 (6), e572–e593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. -T James
(1987) Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. In E. Reuland (Ed.), Between syntax and semantics (pp. 63–85). Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J.
(2009) Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognitive Psychology, 58 1, 376–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jegerski, J., Van Patten, B., & Keating, G. D.
(2011) Cross-linguistic variation and the acquisition of pronominal reference in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 27 (4), 481–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Judy, T.
(2015) Knowledge and processing of subject-related discourse properties in L2 near-native speakers of Spanish, L1 Farsi. In T. Judy & S. Perpinan (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish in understudied language pairings (pp. 169–199). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katsos, N., & Bishop, D. V. M.
(2011) Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature. Cognition, 120 (1), 67–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kronmuller, E., Morisseau, T., & Noveck, I.
(2014) Show me the pragmatic contribution: A developmental investigation of contrastive inference. Journal of Child Language, 41 1, 985–1014. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.
(2000) Presumptive Meanings. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, T. M., & Kruschke, J. K.
(2018) Analyzing ordinal data with metric models: What could possibly go wrong? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79 1, 328–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lozano, C.
(2009) Selective deficits at the syntax-discourse interface: Evidence from the CEDEL2 corpus. In Y.-I. Leung, N. Snape & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Representational deficits in second language acquisition (pp. 127–166). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Pragmatic principles in anaphora resolution at the syntax-discourse interface: Advanced English learners of Spanish in the CEDEL2 corpus. In M. Alonso-Ramos (Ed.), Studies in corpus linguistics (Vol. 781, pp. 235–265). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2018) The development of anaphora resolution at the syntax-discourse interface: Pronominal subjects in Greek learners of Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47 (2), 411–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maes, A., Arts, A., & Noordman, L.
(2004) Reference management in instructive discourse. Discourse Processes, 37 1, 117–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., Giancaspro, D., Iverson, M., Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R.
(2016) Not just algunos, but indeed unos L2ers can acquire scalar implicatures in L2 Spanish. Language Acquisition Beyond Parameters, 51 1, 125–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitkovska, L., & Bužarovska, E.
(2018) Subject pronoun (non)realization in the English learner language of Macedonian speakers. Second Language Research, 34 1, 463–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
National College English Syllabus for Non-English Majors
(1999) Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
Nieuwland, M. S., Ditman, T., & Kuperberg, G. R.
(2010) On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. Journal of Memory and Language, 63 1, 324–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noveck, I. A.
(2001) When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicatures. Cognition, 78 1, 165–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noveck, I. A., & Posada, A.
(2003) Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language, 85 (2), 203–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J.
(2003) Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognition, 86 1, 253–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, W., Lu, Y., & Lee, T. H.
(2019) Existential and locative constructions in mandarin Chinese. Linguistic Review, 37 (2), 231–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pechman, T.
(1989) Incremental speech production and referential overspecification. Linguistics, 27 1, 89–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quesada, T., & Lozano, C.
(2020) Which factors determine the choice of referential expressions in L2 English discourse? New evidence from the COREFL corpus. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42 (5), 959–986. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rothman, J.
(2009) Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences?: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 41 1, 951–973. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, J.
(2015) Overexplicit referent tracking in L2 English: Strategy, avoidance, or myth? Language Learning, 65 (4), 824–859. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sedivy, J. C.
(2007) Implicature during real time conversation: A view from language processing research. Philosophy Compass, 2 1, 475–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sedivy, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N.
(1999) Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 70 1, 19–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skordos, D., & Papafragou, A.
(2016) Children’s derivation of scalar implicatures: Alternatives and relevance. Cognition, 153 1, 6–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2010) Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Lingua, 120 1, 2444–2462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snape, N., & Hosoi, H.
(2018) Acquisition of scalar implicatures: Evidence from adult Japanese L2 learners of English. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8 1, 163–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sonnenschein, S.
(1982) The effects of redundant communications on listeners: When more is less. Child Development, 53 (3), 717–729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A.
(2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1 (1), 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1986/1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.) Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stiller, A., Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C.
(2015) Ad-hoc implicature in preschool children. Language Learning and Development, 11 1, 176–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Su, Y. E.
(2013) Scalar implicatures and downward entailment in child mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 22 (2), 167–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tieu, L., Romoli, J., Zhou, P., & Crain, S.
(2016) Children’s knowledge of free choice inferences and scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics, 33 (2), 269–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veenstra, A., Hollebrandse, B., & Katsos, N.
(2017) Why some children accept under-informative utterances. Lack of competence or pragmatic tolerance? Pragmatic & Cognition, 24 (2), 297–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E., & Katsos, N.
(2021) Pragmatic, linguistic and cognitive factors in young children’s development of quantity, relevance and word learning inferences. Journal of Child Language, 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, X., Minai, U., & Fiorentino, R.
(2018) Context-sensitivity and individual differences in the derivation of scalar implicature. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 1, Article 1720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, E. J., & Frank, M. C.
(2019) The role of salience in young children’s processing of ad hoc implicatures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 186 1, 99–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuan, B.
(1995) Acquisition of base-generated topics by English-speaking learners of Chinese. Language Learning, 45 (4), 567–603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Lozano, Cristóbal & Teresa Quesada
2023. What corpus data reveal about the Position of Antecedent Strategy: anaphora resolution in Spanish monolinguals and L1 English-L2 Spanish bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Lunn, Andrew & Andrea Manfrin
2023. Impact of reduced idea density on pharmacy students' attainment in pharmaceutical calculations: A study protocol for a single-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Educational Research 117 ► pp. 102108 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.