Prediction in bilingual sentence processing
Is it linked to production?
The Unified Competition Model (MacWhinney, 2012)
accounts for cross-linguistic differences in thematic role mapping. We investigated production and predictive use of accusative
case morphology in Russian-Hebrew bilingual children. We also investigated the role of production in predictive processing testing
the Prediction-by-Production Account (Pickering & Garrod, 2018)
vs. the Missing Surface Inflection Hypothesis (Prévost & White,
2000). Three groups of children aged 4–8 participated: Russian-Hebrew-speaking bilinguals, Russian-speaking and
Hebrew-speaking monolingual controls. All children participated in the accusative case production and Visual-World eye-tracking
comprehension experiments. Bilinguals were tested in both of their languages. The results of the study confirmed the predictions
of the Unified Competition Model showing typological differences in the strength of the case-marking cue and its
predictive use in sentence processing in Russian- and Hebrew-speaking controls. While Russian-speaking monolinguals relied on case
marking to predict the upcoming agent/patient, the performance of Hebrew-speaking monolingual children varied. The findings for
bilinguals showed that despite their lower production accuracy in both languages, they were either indistinguishable from
monolinguals or showed an advantage in the predictive use of case morphology. The findings support the Missing Surface
Inflection Hypothesis, which predicts a dissociation between production and comprehension.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Predictive processing in children: Comprehension vs. production
- 1.2Accusative case marking and word order in Russian and Hebrew
- 1.3The current study
- 2.Method
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Design and materials
- 2.2.1Expressive vocabulary in Russian and Hebrew
- 2.2.2Production experiments: ACC case in Russian and Hebrew
- 2.2.3VWP experiments: On-line comprehension of the ACC case in Russian and Hebrew
- 2.3Procedure
- 2.4Eye-tracking data analysis
- 3.Results
- 3.1ACC case production accuracy in Russian and Hebrew
- 3.2VWP experiments: ACC case comprehension in Russian and in Hebrew
- 3.3The effect of age
- 3.4The role of the ACC case production in comprehension
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Future research and conclusions
- Data availability
- Competing interests
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (63)
Abutbul-Oz, H., & Armon-Lotem, S.
(
2022)
Parent
Questionnaires in Screening for Developmental Language Disorder Among Bilingual Children in Speech and Language
Clinics.
Frontiers in Education, 71.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Allen, S.
(
2014)
Argument
Structure. In
P. J. Brooks &
V. Kempe (Eds.),
Encyclopedia
of Language
Development. (pp. 18–19). Sage Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Altman, C., Goldstein, T., & Armon-Lotem, S.
(
2017)
Quantitative
and qualitative differences in the lexical knowledge of monolingual and bilingual children on the LITMUS-CLT
task.
Clinical Linguistics &
Phonetics,
31
(11–12), 931–954.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aumeistere, A., Bultena, S., & Brouwer, S.
(
2022)
Wisdom
comes with age? The role of grammatical gender in predictive processing in Russian children and
adults.
Applied
Psycholinguistics,
43
(4), 867–887.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bailyn, J. F.
(
2012)
The
Syntax of Russian. Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H.
(
2015)
Parsimonious
mixed models.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.04967.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, R. A.
(
1981)
Regularity
vs anomaly: the acquisition of Hebrew inflectional morphology.
Journal of Child
Language,
8
(2), 265–282.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biran, M., & Ruigendijk, E.
(
2015)
Do
case and gender information assist sentence comprehension and repetition for German-and Hebrew-speaking
children? Lingua,
164
1, 215–238.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blom, E., Chondrogianni, V., Marinis, T., & Vasić, N.
(
2016)
The
acquisition of verbal paradigms in Dutch and Greek L2 children: Cross-linguistic differences and inflectional
defaults.
International Journal of
Bilingualism,
20
(4), 386–402.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bosch, J. E. & Foppolo, F.
(
2022)
Predictive
processing of grammatical gender in bilingual children: The effect of cross-linguistic incongruency and language
dominance.
Lingue e
Linguaggio,
21
(1), 5–27.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bosch, J. E., & Foppolo, F.
Bosch, J. E., Chailleux, M. A., Yee, J., Guasti, M. T., & Arosio, F.
Brouwer, S., Sprenger, S., & Unsworth, S.
(
2017)
Processing
grammatical gender in Dutch: Evidence from eye movements.
Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology,
159
1, 50–65.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, V. A.
(
2021)
An
introduction to linear mixed-effects modeling in R.
Advances in Methods and Practices in
Psychological Science,
4
(1).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cejtlin, S. N.
(
2009)
Ocherki
po Slovoobrazovaniyu i Formoobrazovaniyu v Detskoi
Rechi. Znak.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chrabaszcz, A., Ladinskaya, N., & Lopukhina, A.
(
2023)
Acquisition
of Russian noun case by bilingual children: lexical cues to case assignment in real and novel
words.
Language
Acquisition, 1–29.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T.
(
2012)
Production
and processing asymmetries in the acquisition of tense morphology by sequential bilingual
children.
Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition,
15
(1), 5–21.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chondrogianni, V., & Schwartz, R. G.
(
2020)
Case
marking and word order in Greek heritage children.
Journal of Child
Language,
47
(4), 766–795.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Danon, G.
(
2001)
Syntactic
definiteness in the grammar of Modern
Hebrew.
Linguistics,
39
(6), 1071–1116.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
(
2008)
German
Childrens Comprehension of Word Order and Case Marking in Causative Sentences.
Child
Development,
79
(4), 1152–1167.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferreira, F., & Chantavarin, S.
(
2018)
Integration
and prediction in language processing: A synthesis of old and new.
Current Directions in
Psychological
Science,
27
(6), 443–448.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frankel, D. G., Amir, M., Frenkel, E., & Arbel, T.
(
1980)
A
developmental study of the role of word order in comprehending Hebrew.
Journal of Experimental
Child
Psychology,
29
(1), 23–35.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frankel, D. G., & Arbel, T.
(
1981)
Developmental
changes in assigning agent relations in Hebrew: The interaction between word order and structural
cues.
Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology,
32
(1), 102–114.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friedmann, N., & Shapiro, L. P.
(
2003)
Agrammatic
comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS
structures.
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing
Research,
46
1, 288–297.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gagarina, N., & Klassert, A.
(
2018)
Input
Dominance and Development of Home Language in Russian-German Bilinguals.
Frontiers in
Communication,
3
1.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimm, A., Müller, A., Hamann, C., & Ruigendijk, E.
(
2011)
Production-comprehension
asymmetries in child language. Walter de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hacohen, A., Kagan, O., & Plaut, D.
(
2021)
Differential
object marking in modern Hebrew: Definiteness and partitivity.
Glossa: A Journal of General
Linguistics,
6
(1).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haman, E., Łuniewska, M., & Pomiechowska, B.
(
2015)
Designing
Cross-Linguistic Lexical Tasks (CLTs) for Bilingual Preschool
Children. In
Armon-Lotem, S.,
de Jong, J., &
Meir, N. (Eds.),
Assessing
Multilingual Children: Disentangling Bilingualism from Language
Impairment (pp. 196–240). Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hendriks, P., & Koster, C.
(
2010)
Production/comprehension
asymmetries in language
acquisition.
Lingua,
120
(8), 1887–1897.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ionin, T., Goldshtein, M., Luchkina, T., & Styrina, S.
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L.
(
2003)
The
time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye
movements.
Journal of Memory and
Language,
49
(1), 133–156.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Karaca, F., Brouwer, S., Unsworth, S. & Huettig, F.
Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B.
(
1998)
The
acquisition of case marking by adult learners of Russian and German.
Studies in Second Language
Acquisition,
20
(4), 543–587.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F.
(
2016)
What
do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and
Neuroscience,
31
(1), 32–59.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lemmerth, N., & Hopp, H.
(
2019)
Gender
processing in simultaneous and successive bilingual children: Cross-linguistic lexical and syntactic
influences.
Language
Acquisition,
26
(1), 21–45.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P. & Herve, M.
(
2019)
Package
‘emmeans’.
[URL]
MacWhinney, B.
(
2012)
The
logic of the unified model. In
Mackey, A. &
Gass, S. M. (Eds.),
The
Routledge Handbook of Second Language
Acquisition. (pp. 211–227). Routledge.
[URL]
MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R.
(
1984)
Cue
validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian.
Journal of verbal
learning and verbal
behavior, 23(2), 127–150.
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E.
(
1989)
The
Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, C. D., Branzi, F. M., & Bar, M.
(
2018)
Prediction
is production: The missing link between language production and comprehension.
Scientific
Reports,
8
(1), 1079.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meir, N., Avramenko, M., & Verkhovtceva, T.
(
2021)
Israeli
Russian: Case morphology in a bilingual context.
Russian Journal of
Linguistics,
25
(4), 886–907.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meir, N., Parshina, O., & Sekerina, I. A.
(
2020)
The
Interaction of Morphological Cues in Bilingual Sentence Processing: An Eye-Tracking
Study. In
Megan M. Brown &
Alexandra Kohut (Eds.),
BUCLD
44: Proceedings of the 44th annual Boston University Conference on Language
Development. Somerville (pp. 376–389). Cascadilla Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meir, N., & Janssen, B.
(
2021)
Child
Heritage Language development: An interplay between cross-linguistic influence and language-external
factors.
Frontiers in
Psychology,
12
1.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meir, N., & Novogrodsky, R.
(
2021)
Referential
expressions in monolingual and bilingual children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): A study of
informativeness and definiteness.
Journal of Child
Language,
50
(2), 215–244.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Özge, D., Kornfilt, J., Maquate, K., Küntay, A. C., & Snedeker, J.
(
2022)
German-speaking
children use sentence-initial case marking for predictive language processing at age
four.
Cognition,
221
1, 104988.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Özge, D., Küntay, A., & Snedeker, J.
(
2019)
Why
wait for the verb? Turkish speaking children use case markers for incremental language
comprehension.
Cognition,
183
1, 152–180.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paradis, J.
(
2023)
Sources
of individual differences in the dual language development of heritage bilinguals.
Journal of
Child
Language,
50
(40), 793–817.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C.
(
2018)
Predicting
while comprehending language: A theory and review.
Psychological
Bulletin,
144
(10), 1002–1044.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S.
(
2007)
Do
people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive
Sciences,
11
(3), 105–110.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S.
(
2013)
How
tightly are production and comprehension interwoven? Frontiers in
Psychology,
4
1.
Art. 238.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plaut, D., & Hacohen, A.
(
2022)
The
acquisition of Hebrew differential object marking: Between production and
comprehension.
Journal of Child Language Acquisition and
Development-JCLAD,
10
(4), 627–652.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prévost, P., & White, L.
(
2000)
Missing
surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and
agreement.
Second Language
Research,
16
(2), 103–133.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
R Core Team
(
2021)
R: A language and
environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
[URL]
Ringblom, N., & Dobrova, G.
(
2019)
Holistic
constructions in heritage Russian and Russian as a second language: Divergence or
delay? Scando-Slavica,
65
(1), 94–106.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sauermann, A., & Gagarina, N.
(
2018)
The
roles of givenness and type of referring expression in the comprehension of word order in Russian-speaking
children.
Linguistics
Vanguard,
4
(s1).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwartz, M., & Minkov, M.
(
2014)
Russian
Case System Acquisition among Russian-Hebrew Speaking Children.
Journal of Slavic
Linguistics,
22
(1), 51–92.
[URL].
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sekerina, I. A., & Trueswell, J. C.
(
2011)
Interactive
processing of contrastive expressions by Russian children.
First
Language,
32
(1–2), 63–87.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sekerina, I. A.
(
2014)
Visual
World Eye–Tracking Paradigm. In
P. J. Brooks and
V. Kempe, (Eds.)
Encyclopedia
of Language
Development. (pp. 658–658). SAGE Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shvedova, N. Y.
(
1980)
Russkaya
grammatika [Russian grammar]. Institute of the Russian Language, Russian Academy of Sciences. (in Rus.)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slioussar, N., & Makarchuk, I.
(
2022)
SOV
in Russian: A corpus study.
Journal of Slavic
Linguistics,
30
1, 1–14.
[URL]
Sokolov, J. L.
(
1988)
Cue
validity in Hebrew sentence comprehension.
Journal of Child
Language,
15
(1), 129–155.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wickham, H.
(
2009)
ggplot2:
Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Parshina, Olga, Nina Ladinskaya, Lidia Gault & Irina A. Sekerina
2024.
Predictive Language Processing in Russian Heritage Speakers: Task Effects on Morphosyntactic Prediction in Reading.
Languages 9:5
► pp. 158 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
van Dijk, Chantal, Jasmijn Bosch & Sharon Unsworth
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.