Cover not available
Article published In:
Processing in Bilingual Children
Edited by Chantal van Dijk, Jasmijn E. Bosch and Sharon Unsworth
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:4] 2024
► pp. 544–576

Prediction in bilingual sentence processing

Is it linked to production?

ORCID logo | Bar-Ilan University
ORCID logo | Middlebury College
ORCID logo | The City University of New York
The Unified Competition Model (MacWhinney, 2012) accounts for cross-linguistic differences in thematic role mapping. We investigated production and predictive use of accusative case morphology in Russian-Hebrew bilingual children. We also investigated the role of production in predictive processing testing the Prediction-by-Production Account (Pickering & Garrod, 2018) vs. the Missing Surface Inflection Hypothesis (Prévost & White, 2000). Three groups of children aged 4–8 participated: Russian-Hebrew-speaking bilinguals, Russian-speaking and Hebrew-speaking monolingual controls. All children participated in the accusative case production and Visual-World eye-tracking comprehension experiments. Bilinguals were tested in both of their languages. The results of the study confirmed the predictions of the Unified Competition Model showing typological differences in the strength of the case-marking cue and its predictive use in sentence processing in Russian- and Hebrew-speaking controls. While Russian-speaking monolinguals relied on case marking to predict the upcoming agent/patient, the performance of Hebrew-speaking monolingual children varied. The findings for bilinguals showed that despite their lower production accuracy in both languages, they were either indistinguishable from monolinguals or showed an advantage in the predictive use of case morphology. The findings support the Missing Surface Inflection Hypothesis, which predicts a dissociation between production and comprehension.
Keywords: sentence processing, prediction, Russian, Hebrew, case morphology, Visual-World, Visual-World paradigm (eye-tracking)
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Predictive processing in children: Comprehension vs. production
    • 1.2Accusative case marking and word order in Russian and Hebrew
    • 1.3The current study
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Design and materials
      • 2.2.1Expressive vocabulary in Russian and Hebrew
      • 2.2.2Production experiments: ACC case in Russian and Hebrew
      • 2.2.3VWP experiments: On-line comprehension of the ACC case in Russian and Hebrew
    • 2.3Procedure
    • 2.4Eye-tracking data analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1ACC case production accuracy in Russian and Hebrew
    • 3.2VWP experiments: ACC case comprehension in Russian and in Hebrew
    • 3.3The effect of age
    • 3.4The role of the ACC case production in comprehension
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Future research and conclusions
  • Data availability
  • Competing interests
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 March 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22102.mei
References (63)
References
Abutbul-Oz, H., & Armon-Lotem, S. (2022). Parent Questionnaires in Screening for Developmental Language Disorder Among Bilingual Children in Speech and Language Clinics. Frontiers in Education, 71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, S. (2014). Argument Structure. In P. J. Brooks & V. Kempe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language Development. (pp. 18–19). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Altman, C., Goldstein, T., & Armon-Lotem, S. (2017). Quantitative and qualitative differences in the lexical knowledge of monolingual and bilingual children on the LITMUS-CLT task. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 31 (11–12), 931–954. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aumeistere, A., Bultena, S., & Brouwer, S. (2022). Wisdom comes with age? The role of grammatical gender in predictive processing in Russian children and adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43 (4), 867–887. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailyn, J. F. (2012). The Syntax of Russian. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.04967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A. (1981). Regularity vs anomaly: the acquisition of Hebrew inflectional morphology. Journal of Child Language, 8 (2), 265–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biran, M., & Ruigendijk, E. (2015). Do case and gender information assist sentence comprehension and repetition for German-and Hebrew-speaking children? Lingua, 164 1, 215–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, E., Chondrogianni, V., Marinis, T., & Vasić, N. (2016). The acquisition of verbal paradigms in Dutch and Greek L2 children: Cross-linguistic differences and inflectional defaults. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20 (4), 386–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosch, J. E. & Foppolo, F. (2022). Predictive processing of grammatical gender in bilingual children: The effect of cross-linguistic incongruency and language dominance. Lingue e Linguaggio, 21 (1), 5–27.Google Scholar
Bosch, J. E., Chailleux, M. A., Yee, J., Guasti, M. T., & Arosio, F. (2022). Prediction on the basis of gender and number in Mandarin-Italian bilingual children. In Ayoun, D. (Ed.), The acquisition of gender (pp. 243–272). John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, S., Sprenger, S., & Unsworth, S. (2017). Processing grammatical gender in Dutch: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 159 1, 50–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, V. A. (2021). An introduction to linear mixed-effects modeling in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cejtlin, S. N. (2009). Ocherki po Slovoobrazovaniyu i Formoobrazovaniyu v Detskoi Rechi. Znak.Google Scholar
Chrabaszcz, A., Ladinskaya, N., & Lopukhina, A. (2023). Acquisition of Russian noun case by bilingual children: lexical cues to case assignment in real and novel words. Language Acquisition, 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T. (2012). Production and processing asymmetries in the acquisition of tense morphology by sequential bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15 (1), 5–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., & Schwartz, R. G. (2020). Case marking and word order in Greek heritage children. Journal of Child Language, 47 (4), 766–795. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danon, G. (2001). Syntactic definiteness in the grammar of Modern Hebrew. Linguistics, 39 (6), 1071–1116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). German Childrens Comprehension of Word Order and Case Marking in Causative Sentences. Child Development, 79 (4), 1152–1167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Chantavarin, S. (2018). Integration and prediction in language processing: A synthesis of old and new. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27 (6), 443–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frankel, D. G., Amir, M., Frenkel, E., & Arbel, T. (1980). A developmental study of the role of word order in comprehending Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29 (1), 23–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frankel, D. G., & Arbel, T. (1981). Developmental changes in assigning agent relations in Hebrew: The interaction between word order and structural cues. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32 (1), 102–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Shapiro, L. P. (2003). Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS structures. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 46 1, 288–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagarina, N., & Klassert, A. (2018). Input Dominance and Development of Home Language in Russian-German Bilinguals. Frontiers in Communication, 3 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimm, A., Müller, A., Hamann, C., & Ruigendijk, E. (2011). Production-comprehension asymmetries in child language. Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hacohen, A., Kagan, O., & Plaut, D. (2021). Differential object marking in modern Hebrew: Definiteness and partitivity. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 6 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haman, E., Łuniewska, M., & Pomiechowska, B. (2015). Designing Cross-Linguistic Lexical Tasks (CLTs) for Bilingual Preschool Children. In Armon-Lotem, S., de Jong, J., & Meir, N. (Eds.), Assessing Multilingual Children: Disentangling Bilingualism from Language Impairment (pp. 196–240). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, P., & Koster, C. (2010). Production/comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition. Lingua, 120 (8), 1887–1897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Goldshtein, M., Luchkina, T., & Styrina, S. (2023). Who did what to whom, and what did we already know? Word order and information structure in heritage and L2 Russian. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 13 (3), 343–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49 (1), 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karaca, F., Brouwer, S., Unsworth, S. & Huettig, F. (2021). Prediction in bilingual children: The missing piece of the puzzle. In Kaan, E. & Grüter, T. (Eds.), Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning (pp. 116–137). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B. (1998). The acquisition of case marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20 (4), 543–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31 (1), 32–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemmerth, N., & Hopp, H. (2019). Gender processing in simultaneous and successive bilingual children: Cross-linguistic lexical and syntactic influences. Language Acquisition, 26 (1), 21–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P. & Herve, M. (2019). Package ‘emmeans’. [URL]
MacWhinney, B. (2012). The logic of the unified model. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. (pp. 211–227). Routledge. [URL]
MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 23(2), 127–150.
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1989). The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, C. D., Branzi, F. M., & Bar, M. (2018). Prediction is production: The missing link between language production and comprehension. Scientific Reports, 8 (1), 1079. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, N., Avramenko, M., & Verkhovtceva, T. (2021). Israeli Russian: Case morphology in a bilingual context. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 25 (4), 886–907. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, N., Parshina, O., & Sekerina, I. A. (2020). The Interaction of Morphological Cues in Bilingual Sentence Processing: An Eye-Tracking Study. In Megan M. Brown & Alexandra Kohut (Eds.), BUCLD 44: Proceedings of the 44th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville (pp. 376–389). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Meir, N., & Janssen, B. (2021). Child Heritage Language development: An interplay between cross-linguistic influence and language-external factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2021). Referential expressions in monolingual and bilingual children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): A study of informativeness and definiteness. Journal of Child Language, 50 (2), 215–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özge, D., Kornfilt, J., Maquate, K., Küntay, A. C., & Snedeker, J. (2022). German-speaking children use sentence-initial case marking for predictive language processing at age four. Cognition, 221 1, 104988. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özge, D., Küntay, A., & Snedeker, J. (2019). Why wait for the verb? Turkish speaking children use case markers for incremental language comprehension. Cognition, 183 1, 152–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2023). Sources of individual differences in the dual language development of heritage bilinguals. Journal of Child Language, 50 (40), 793–817. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018). Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin, 144 (10), 1002–1044. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11 (3), 105–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). How tightly are production and comprehension interwoven? Frontiers in Psychology, 4 1. Art. 238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plaut, D., & Hacohen, A. (2022). The acquisition of Hebrew differential object marking: Between production and comprehension. Journal of Child Language Acquisition and Development-JCLAD, 10 (4), 627–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16 (2), 103–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Ringblom, N., & Dobrova, G. (2019). Holistic constructions in heritage Russian and Russian as a second language: Divergence or delay? Scando-Slavica, 65 (1), 94–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauermann, A., & Gagarina, N. (2018). The roles of givenness and type of referring expression in the comprehension of word order in Russian-speaking children. Linguistics Vanguard, 4 (s1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M., & Minkov, M. (2014). Russian Case System Acquisition among Russian-Hebrew Speaking Children. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 22 (1), 51–92. [URL]. DOI logo
Sekerina, I. A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2011). Interactive processing of contrastive expressions by Russian children. First Language, 32 (1–2), 63–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sekerina, I. A. (2014). Visual World Eye–Tracking Paradigm. In P. J. Brooks and V. Kempe, (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Language Development. (pp. 658–658). SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Shvedova, N. Y. (1980). Russkaya grammatika [Russian grammar]. Institute of the Russian Language, Russian Academy of Sciences. (in Rus.)Google Scholar
Slioussar, N., & Makarchuk, I. (2022). SOV in Russian: A corpus study. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 30 1, 1–14. [URL]
Sokolov, J. L. (1988). Cue validity in Hebrew sentence comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 15 (1), 129–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Musundire, Austin
2024. Exploring Challenges and Opportunities of the Social Justice Philosophy in Education in South African Private Schools. In Educational Philosophy and Sociological Foundation of Education [Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership, ], ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Parshina, Olga, Nina Ladinskaya, Lidia Gault & Irina A. Sekerina
2024. Predictive Language Processing in Russian Heritage Speakers: Task Effects on Morphosyntactic Prediction in Reading. Languages 9:5 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
van Dijk, Chantal, Jasmijn Bosch & Sharon Unsworth
2024. Language processing in bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:4 ► pp. 435 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.