Cover not available
Commentary published In:
Epistemological issue: The importance of features and exponents: Dissolving Feature Reassembly
Edited by Cristina Flores and Neal Snape
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:1] 2024
► pp. 99–103
Commentary

Multilingual grammars

The next frontier in comparative syntax

ORCID logo | Newcastle University
Article outline
  • I-languages and non-homogeneity
  • The representation of multilingual grammars
  • Finding a way forward
  • References
Published online: 1 February 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.23061.she
References
van Baal, Y.
(2020) Compositional definiteness in American heritage Norwegian. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo.
(2022) New Data on Language Change: Compositional Definiteness in American Norwegian. Heritage Language Journal, 191, 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, P., M. E. L. Duarte & M. Kato
(2005) Null subjects in European and Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 41, 11–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., S. Montrul & M. Polinsky
(2013) Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39 (3–4), 129–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M.
(2018) Why the Dichotomy ‘L1 Versus LX User’ is Better than ‘Native Versus Non-native Speaker’. Applied Linguistics, 39(2), 236–240.Google Scholar
Lohndal, T. & M. Putnam
(2024) The importance of features and exponents: Dissolving Feature Reassembly. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 14(1).Google Scholar
Romaine, S.
(2017) Multilingualism. In M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The Handbook of Linguistics (pp. 512–532). Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar