Universal Minimal Structure
Evidence and theoretical ramifications
This paper addresses the fundamental question of whether (or how) functional projections are acquired during the development of syntax. However, rather than concentrating on the actual acquisition of functional projections, we consider the starting point of syntactic development: if functional projections develop during acquisition, there must be an early stage that can at least occasionally be attested that does not reveal evidence of functional projections. The relevant data concerns utterances distinct from the target language that appear to involve reduced structure. By briefly reviewing the relevant literature, we conclude that there is suggestive evidence that reduced structure is an option for all language learners. This points to the conclusion that the possibility of positing reduced structure is an option in the language module, regardless of age.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1The need for an acquisition mechanism
- 1.2The problem with maturation
- 1.3Questions without a CP?
- 2.Root Defaults in typical L1 acquisition
- 3.Root Defaults in second language acquisition
- 3.1
Root Defaults in child second language acquisition
- 3.2RDs in adult second language acquisition
- 4.Atypical L1 development and the bare VP stage
- 4.1Complete lack of input during the critical period: Genie and Kaspar Hauser
- 4.2Little usable input
- 4.3Cognitive and linguistic impairment
- 4.4German SLI
-
4.5Summary of the atypical L1 studies
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1The universal VP-stage
-
5.2Preliminary thoughts on the acquisition mechanism
- 6.Conclusion
-
References
References (93)
References
Baker, M. (2008). The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boser, K., Lust, B., Santelman, L., & Whitman, J. (1992). The syntax of CP and V-2 in early child German (ECG). The Strong Continuity Hypothesis. In NELS Proceedings 221 (pp. 51–65). University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In C.P. Otero, R. Freidin, & M.L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, G. (2010). The syntax of adjectives. A comparative study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, H. (1988). Kritische Phasen der Grammatikenwicklung. Eine Untersuchung zum Negationserwerb bei Kindern and Erwachsenen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 71, 3–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, H. (1991). Constraints on parameter setting. A grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German child language. Language Acquisition, 11, 361–391. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J., & Pienemann, M. (1983). Deutsch als Zweitsprache: Der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culicover, P., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curtiss, S. (1982). Developmental dissociations of language and cognition. In L. Obler & L. Menn (Eds.), Exceptional language and linguistics (pp. 285–312). New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curtiss, S., & de Bode, S. (2001). Language after hemispherectomy: If neither side nor age matters, what does? In L. Dominguez & A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) (pp. 202–213) Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curtiss, S., & Schaeffer, J. (1997). Syntactic development in children with hemispherectomy: The INFL-system. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) (pp. 103–114). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dimroth, C. (2002). Topics, assertions, and additive words: How L2 learners get from information structure to target-language syntax. Linguistics, 401, 891–923. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 231, 245–258.. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Epstein, S.D., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1996). Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 191, 677–758. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fromkin, V., Krashen, S., Curtiss, S., Rigler, D., & Rigler, M. (1974). The development of language in Genie: A case of language acquisition beyond the ‘Critical Period’. Brain and Language, 11, 81–107. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mylander, C. (1990). Beyond the input given: The child’s role in the acquisition of language. Language, 661, 323–355. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guilfoyle, E., & Noonan, M. (1992). Functional categories in language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 371, 241–272. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gülzow, I., & Gagarina, N. (2006). Analytic and synthetic verb constructions in Russian and English child language. In N. Gagarina & I. Gülzow (Eds.), The acquisition of verbs and their grammar. The effect of particular languages (pp. 229–259). Berlin: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hamann, C., Penner, Z., & Lindner, K. (1998). German impaired grammar: The clause structure revisited. Language Acquisition, 71, 193–245. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haznedar, B. (1997). Child second language acquisition of English: A longitudinal case study of a Turkish-speaking child. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Durham, Durham, UK.
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B.D. (1997). Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) (pp. 257–268) Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hegarty, M. (2005). A feature-based syntax of functional categories: The structure, acquisition and specific impairment of functional systems. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyams, N. (1992). The genesis of clausal structure. In J. Meisel (Ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition (pp. 371–400). Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyams, N. (2005). Child non-finite clauses and the mood-aspect connection: Evidence from child Greek. In P. Kempchinksy & R. Slabakova (Eds.), Aspectual inquiries (pp. 292–315). Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyams, N. (2007). Aspectual effects on interpretation in early grammar. Language Acquisition, 141, 231–268. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakubowicz, C., & Tuller, L. (2008). Specific language impairment in French. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), Studies in French applied linguistics (pp. 97–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kallestinova, E. (2007). Three stages of root infinitive production in early child Russian. First Language, 271, 99–131. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kegl, J. (1994). The Nicaraguan sign language project: An overview. Signpost, 71, 24–46.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 131, 301–347. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ko, H., Ionin, T., & Wexler, K. (2010). The role of presupposionality in the second language acquisition of English articles. Linguistic Inquiry, 411, 213–254. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lardiere, D. (1998). Dissociating syntax from morphology in divergent end-state grammars. Second Language Research, 141, 359–375. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lardiere, D. (2003). Revisiting the comparative fallacy: A reply to Lakshmanan & Selinker (2001). Second Language Research, 191, 129–143.. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 251, 173–227. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lebeaux, D. (1988). Language acquisition and the form of the grammar. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
Lenneberg, E. (1967). The biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leonard, L. (2000). Specific language impairment across languages. In D.V.M. Bishop & L.B. Leonard (Eds.), Speech and language impairments in children (pp. 155–129). Hove: Psychology Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Letts, C. (1993). Do explanatory theories of language acquisition have any practical value? In J. Clibbens & B. Pendleton (Eds.), Proceedings of the Child Language Seminar (pp. 93–107). Plymouth, UK: University of Plymouth.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liceras, J., Bel, A., & Perales, S. (2006). Living with optionality: Root infinitives, bare forms and inflected forms in child null subject languages. In N. Sagarra & A.J. Toribio (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 203–216). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lindner, K. (2002). Finiteness and children with specific language impairment: An exploratory study. Linguistics, 401, 797–847. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Louden, M.L. (1999). Incomplete L1 acquisition: The morphosyntax of Kaspar Hauser. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, & C. Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) (pp. 419–430). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lust, B. (2006). Child language. Acquisition and growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGuckian, M., & Henry, A. (2003). Grammatical morpheme omission in children with hearing impairment acquiring spoken English. In B. Beachley, A. Brown, & F. Conlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) (pp. 519–530). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meisel, J.M., & Müller, N. (1992). Finiteness and verb placement in early child grammars. In J.M. Meisel (Ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition (pp. 109–138). Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mills, A. (1985). The acquisition of German. In D.I. Slobin (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 11 (pp. 141–254). London: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mogford, K. (1993). Oral language acquisition in the prelinguistically deaf. In D. Bishop & K. Mogford (Eds.), Language development in exceptional circumstances (pp. 110–131). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myles, F. (2004). From data to theory. Transactions of the Philological Society, 1021, 139–168. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myles, F. (2005). The emergence of morphosyntax in classroom learners of French. In J.-M. Dewaele (Ed.), Focus on French as a foreign language: Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 88–113). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newport, E. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 141, 11–28. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Orfitelli, R., & Hyams, N. (2008). An experimental study of children’s comprehension of null subjects: Implications for grammatical/performance accounts. In H. Chan, H. Jacob, & E. Kapia (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) (pp. 335–346). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2001). The morphosyntax of specific language impairment in French: Evidence for an extended optional default account. Language Acquisition, 91, 269–300. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paradis, J., Rice, M., Crago, M., & Marquis, J. (2008). The acquisition of tense in English: Distinguishing child L2 from L1 and SLI. Applied Psycholinguistics, 291, 1–34.. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Penner, Z., & Roeper, T. (1998). Trigger theory and the acquisition of complement idioms. In N. Dittmar & Z. Penner (Eds.), Essays in language acquisition. Festschrift in honor of Jürgen Weissenborn (pp. 77–112). Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Phillips, C. (1995). Syntax at age two: Cross-linguistic differences. In C. Schütze, J. Ganger, & K. Broihier (Eds.), Papers on language processing and acquisition (pp. 225–282). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M. (1981). Der Zweitspracherberb ausländischer Arbeiterkinder. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poeppel, D., & Wexler, K. (1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 691, 1–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Powers, S. (1995). The acquisition of pronouns in Dutch and English: The case for continuity. In D. MacLaughlin & S. McEwen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) (pp. 439–450). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prévost, P. (1997) Truncation in second language acquisition. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Prévost, P. (2003). Truncation and missing inflection in initial child L2 German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 251, 65–97. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000a). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition. Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 161, 103–134. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000b). Finiteness and variability in SLA: More evidence for missing surface inflection. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, & C. Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) (pp. 575–586). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000c). Accounting for morphological variation in second language acquisition: Truncation or missing inflection? In M.A. Friedman & L. Rizzi (Eds.), The acquisition of syntax: Studies in comparative developmental linguistics (pp. 202–235). London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radford, A. (1995). Children: Architects or brickies? In D. MacLaughlin & S. McEwen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) (pp. 1–19). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rice, M., Wexler, K., & Cleave, P. (1995). Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 381, 850–863. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rice, M., & Wexler, K. (1996). A phenotype of specific language impairment: Extended optional infinitives. In M. Rice (Ed.), Toward a genetics of language (pp. 215–237). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, L. (1993/4). Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition, 31, 371–393. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, L. (2005). On the grammatical basis of language development: A case study. In G. Cinque & R. Kayne (Eds.), Handbook of comparative syntax (pp. 70–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rohrbacher, B., & Vainikka, A. (1994). Verbs and subjects before age 2: The earliest stages in Germanic L1 acquisition. In J. Beckman (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 25, vol. 21 (pp. 55–69). Amherst, MA: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sakus, W.G., & Fodor, J.D. (2001). The structural triggers learner. In S. Bertolo (Ed.), Language acquisition and learnability (pp. 172–233). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwartz, B.D., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 121, 40–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Senghas, A., Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2004). Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science, 3051, 1779–1782. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thordardottir, E.T., Chapman, R.S., & Wagner, L. (2002). Complex sentence production by adolescents with Down syndrome. Applied Psycholinguistics, 231, 163–183. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vainikka, A. (1993/4). Case in the development of English syntax. Language Acquisition, 31, 257–325. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (1996). The early stages in adult L2 syntax: Additional evidence from Romance speakers. Second Language Research, 121, 140–176. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (2002). Restructuring the CP in L2 German. In B. Skarabela, S. Fish, & A.H.-J. Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) (pp. 712–722). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vainikka, A. & Young-Scholten, M. (2011). The acquisition of German. Introducing organic grammar. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Varlokosta, S., Vainikka, A., & Rohrbacher, B. (1998). Functional projections, markedness and ‘root infinitives’ in early child Greek. The Linguistic Review, 151, 187–207. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Webelhuth, G. (1995). X-bar theory and case theory. In G. Webelhuth (Ed.), Government and binding theory and the Minimalist Program (pp. 15–95). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 1061, 23–79. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wexler, K. (2000). Three problems in the theory of the optional infinitive stage: Stage/individual predicates, eventive verbs and finite null-subjects. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 191, 560–573.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wexler, K. (2004). Theory of phrasal development: Perfection in child grammar. In A. Csirmaz, A. Gualmini, & A. Nevins (Eds.), Plato’s problems: Papers on language acquisition (pp. 159–209). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wexler, K., Schütze, C.T., & Rice, M. (1998). Subject case in children with SLI and unaffected controls: Evidence for the Agr/Tns omission model. Language Acquisition, 71, 317–344. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yamada-Yamamoto, A. (1993). The acquisition of English syntax by a Japanese-speaking child: With special emphasis on the VO-sequence acquisition. In J. Clibbens & B. Pendleton (Eds.), Proceedings of the Child Language Seminar (pp. 109–120). Plymouth, UK: University of Plymouth.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zanuttini, R. (2008). Encoding the addressee in syntax: Evidence from English imperative subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 261, 185–218. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Hsin, Lisa & Geraldine Legendre
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.