References

References

Chomsky, N.
(2001) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Lück, M., & Hahne, A.
(2007) How children process over-regularizations: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Child Language, 34, 601–622. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Herten, M., Chwilla, D.J., & Kolk, H.H.J.
(2006) When heuristics clash with parsing routines: ERP evidence for conflict monitoring in sentence perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1181–1197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A.
(1992) A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P.J.
(2000) The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 159–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, A., & Osterhout, L.
(2005) The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 205–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
King, J.W., & Just, M.A.
(1991) Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580–602. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
King, J.W., Kutas, M.
(1995) Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 376–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, G.R.
(2007) Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, G.R., Kreher, D.A., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P.J.
(2007) The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 100, 223–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K.D.
(2000) Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.A.
(1980) Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic anomaly. Science, 207, 203–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1984) Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, J., Tanner, D., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., Inoue, K., Valentine, G., & Osterhout, L.
(2010) Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of L2 grammatical learning. Language Learning, 60(Suppl. 2), 123–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van de Meerendonk, N., Kolk, H.H.J., Vissers, C.T.W.M., & Chwilla, D.J.
(2010) Monitoring in language perception: Mild and strong conflicts elicit different ERP patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 67–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Carpenter, P.A., & Just, M.A.
(1994) A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 671–717. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molinaro, N., Barber, H., & Carreiras, M.
(2011) Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 47, 908–930. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, H., Saron, C., & Swaab, T.Y.
(2010) Speech and span: Working memory capacity impacts the use of animacy but not of world knowledge during spoken sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2886–2898.[ p. 356 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oines, L., Miyake, A., & Kim, A.
(2012) Individual differences in verbal working memory predict reanalysis vs. integration in syntax-semantics conflict scenarios. Poster presented at the Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference. Riva del Garda, Italy.Google Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P.J.
(1992) Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785–806. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P.J., & Swinney, D.A.
(1994) Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence for the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 786–803.Google Scholar
Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, J., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., & Molinaro, N.
(2006) Novice learners, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second language processing. Language Learning, 56(Suppl. 1), 199–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Petten, C.K., Weckerly, J., McIsaac, H.K., & Kutas, M.
(1997) Working memory capacity dissociates lexical and sentential context effects. Psychological Science, 8, 238–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rugg, M.D., & Coles, M.G.H.
(1995) The ERP and cognitive psychology: Conceptual issues. In M.D. Rugg, & M.G.H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 27–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tanner, D.
(2011) Agreement mechanisms in native and nonnative language processing: Electrophysiological correlates of complexity and interference. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Tanner, D., & Van Hell, J.G.
(2012) ERPs reveal individual differences in syntactic processing strategies. Poster presented at the Psychonomics Society Conference. Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Tanner, D., & Van Hell, J. G.
(2013) ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Tanner, D., McLaughlin, J., Herschensohn, J., & Osterhout, L.
in press). Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
Tanner, D., Inoue, K., & Osterhout, L.
in press). Brain-based individual differences in on-line L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
Vos, S.H., Gunter, T.C., Kolk, H.H.J., & Mulder, G.
(2001) Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 38, 41–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Christianson, Kiel
2017.  In The Handbook of Linguistics,  pp. 345 ff. Crossref logo
Mehravari, Alison S., Karen Emmorey, Chantel S. Prat, Lindsay Klarman & Lee Osterhout
2017. Brain-based individual difference measures of reading skill in deaf and hearing adults. Neuropsychologia 101  pp. 153 ff. Crossref logo
Rastelli, Stefano
2018. Neurolinguistics and second language teaching: A view from the crossroads. Second Language Research 34:1  pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo
Roberts, Leah, Jorge González Alonso, Christos Pliatsikas & Jason Rothman
2018. Evidence from neurolinguistic methodologies: Can it actually inform linguistic/language acquisition theories and translate to evidence-based applications?. Second Language Research 34:1  pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo
Rothman, Jason, José Alemán Bañón & Jorge González Alonso
2015. Neurolinguistic measures of typological effects in multilingual transfer: introducing an ERP methodology. Frontiers in Psychology 6 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.