Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 3:4 (2013) ► pp.448–477

Making use of cues to sentence length in L1 and L2 German [*] *

| University of Calgary
| Pennsylvania State University
| Pennsylvania State University

The current study examines whether German native speakers and immersed and non-immersed L2 learners of German use prosodic cues to identify the length of a sentence in perception as a means to investigate the interaction between prosody and syntactic structure among L2 learners. In a perceptual gating experiment, all three groups successfully differentiated short from medium and long sentences, although the native speakers used cues to identify sentence length earlier than the L2 learners. Among the L2 participants, those immersed in the L2 and those with higher L2 proficiency were better able to distinguish sentence length in the gating task. Importantly, immersed participants were more likely to differentiate short from non-short sentences than those who were not immersed, and those who were more proficient were less indeterminate and more confident in their responses than were those with lower L2 proficiency.

Keywords: perception, acoustic cues, second language, immersion, proficiency, sentence length, prosody
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Sensitivity to prosodic cues in the L1 and L2
    • 1.2Cues to sentence length
    • 1.3The present study
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials
    • 2.3Acoustic analyses of perception task stimuli
    • 2.4Procedure
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Perceptual gating task
      • 3.1.1 German native speakers
      • 3.1.2 L2 German learners
      • 3.1.3 Confidence ratings
  • 4.General discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 11 October 2013
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.3.4.03obr
References
Agresti, A
(2007) An introduction to categorical data analysis (2nd edition). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, W., & Trofimovich, P
(2006) Perceptual paths to accurate production of L2 vowels: The role of individual differences. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 441, 231–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barry, A. S
(2007) The form, function and distribution of high rising intonation in Southern Californian and Southern British English. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Beach, C. M., Katz, W. F., & Skowronski, A
(1996) Children’s processing of prosodic cues for phrasal interpretation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 991, 1148–1160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D
(2009) Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.21) [Computer program]. Retrieved from: <http://www.praat.org/> (15 December 2009)Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. E
(1990a) Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 111, 303–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990b) Perception and production of a new vowel category by adult second language learners. In J. Leather and A. James (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1990 Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-language Speech (pp. 37–56). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Cardoso, W
(2011) The development of coda perception in second language phonology: A variationist perspective. Second Language Research, 271, 433–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L
(2000) Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1071, 989–999. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A
(2009) Greater sensitivity to prosodic goodness in non-native than in native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1251, 3522–2525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W
(1997) Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech 401, 141–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daly, N., & Warren, P
(2001) Pitching it differently in New Zealand English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 51, 85–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delattre, P
(1965) Comparing the phonetic features of English, German, Spanish, and French. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
(1968) A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 41, 183–198.Google Scholar
de Jong, N. H., & Wempe, T
(2009) Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 411, 385–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R. A
(2006) The comparative fallacy in L2 processing research. In M. G. O’Brien, C. Shea & J. Archibald (Eds.), Proceedings from the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2006) (pp. 33–40). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Donaldson, B., Edmonds, A. C., Fultz, A. L., & Petrusch, R. A
(2008) Syntactic and prosodic computations in the resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguity by English-French learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 301, 453–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J
(2009) The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 311, 533–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enomoto, A
(2007) Perception of short English sentences by Japanese learners of English: A gating study. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 111, 151–167.Google Scholar
Face, T. L
(2005) F0 peak height and the perception of sentence type in Castilian Spanish. Revista Internacional De Linguistica Iberoamericana, 31, 49–65. Exploring the use oGoogle Scholar
Féry, C
(1993) German intonational patterns. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, J
(2008) Revising segmentation hypotheses in first and second language listening. System, 361, 35–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.S., & Jang, S
(1997) Effects of perception on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 251, 437–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fultz, A
(2007) Prosody in syntactic disambiguation in English-French interlanguage. Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 321, 394–405.Google Scholar
Goethe-Institut
(2004) Einstufungstest [Placement test]. Retrieved from: <http://www.goethe.de/cgi-bin/einstufungstest/einstufungstest.pl> (30 October 2006)Google Scholar
Grabe, E
(1998) Comparative intonational phonology: English and German. Wageningen: Ponsen and Looijen.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F
(1983) How long is the sentence? Prediction and prosody in the on-line processing of language. Linguistics, 211, 501–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Gating. Language and Cognitive Processes, 111, 597–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, J. & Hirt, C
(1996) Using prosody to predict the end of sentences in English and French: Normal and brain damaged subjects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 111, 107– 134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, U
(2009) Non-native speech: A corpus-based analysis of phonological and phonetic properties of L2 English and German. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoyte, K. J., Brownell, H., & Wingfield, A
(2009) Components of speech prosody and their use in detection of syntactic structure by older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 351, 129–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ioup, G
(2008) Exploring the role of age in the acquisition of a second language phonology. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. L. Zampini. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 41–62). Amesterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, K., & Strange, W
(2009) Perception of allophonic cues to English word boundaries by Japanese second language learners of English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1251, 2348–2360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jia, G., Strange, W., Wu, Y., Collado, J., & Guan, Q
(2005) Age differences in perceptual sensitivity to new speech sounds: The younger the better? Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 291, 306–319.Google Scholar
Jackson, C., O’Brien, M. G., & Gardner, C. E
(2011) Prosodic cues to syntactic disambiguation in L2 German. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 308–320). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Broersma, M., & Cho, T
(2012) The use of prosodic cues in processing an unfamiliar language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 341, 415–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kjelgaard, M. M., & Speer, S. R
(1999) Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 401, 153–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langus, A., Marchetto, E., Bion, R. A. H., & Nespor, M
(2012) Can prosody be used to discover hierarchical structure in continuous speech? Journal of Memory and Language, 661, 285–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, I
(1973) Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa, 71, 107–122.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I., Olive, J. P., & Streeter, L. A
(1976) The role of duration in disambiguation in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 601, 1199–1202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lingel, S., Pappert, S., & Pechman, T
(2006) The prosody of German pp-attachment ambiguities: Evidence from production and perception. Poster presentation at the 12th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Millotte, S., Wales, R., & Christophe, A
(2007) Phrasal prosody disambiguates syntax. Language and Cognitive Processes 221, 898–909. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nguyễn, T. A., Ingram, C. L. J., & Pensalfini, J. R
(2008) Prosodic transfer in Vietnamese acquisition of English contrastive stress patterns. Journal of Phonetics, 361, 158–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, M. G
(2003) Longitudinal development of second language German vowels. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar
Quené, H., & van den Bergh, H
(2008) Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binominal data. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 413–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A
(2004) GLLAMM manual. U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 160. [URL].Google Scholar
Schließer, J., Pappert, S., & Pechmann, T
(2006) Case and prosody as predictors of argument structure. Paper presented at The 19th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Scott, D
(1982) Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 711, 996–1007. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, X. S
(1990) Ability of learning the prosody of an intonational language by speakers of a tonal language: Chinese speakers learning French prosody. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 281, 119–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shockey, L
(2003) Sound patterns of spoken English. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J
(2003) Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 481, 103–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeter, L
(1978) Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 641, 1582–1592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Titone, D. A., Koh, C. K., Kjelgaard, M. M., Bruce, S., Speer, S. R., & Wingfield, A
(2006) Agerelated impairments in the revision of syntactic misanalyses: Effects of prosody. Language and Speech, 491, 75–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A., & Owens, N
(2010) The role of acoustic cues in development of (non-)target-likesecond-language prosodic representations. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 551, 85–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, M
(2012) Comparing the perceptual abilities of monolinguals, bilinguals and multilinguals: A combined behavioural and event-related potential experiment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W
(2006) Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 281, 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuttle, S. G., & Lovick, O
(2007) Intonational marking of discourse units in two Dena’ina narratives. Nouveaux cahier s de linguistique française, 281, 305–316;Google Scholar
Tyler, M. D., & Cutler, A
(2009) Cross-language differences in cues for speech segmentation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1261, 367–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Heuven, V. J., & Haan, J
(2000) When and how do we hear whether a Dutch speech utterance is a statement or a declarative question? Linguistics in the Netherlands, 171, 93–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vion, M., & Colas, A
(2006) Pitch cues for the recognition of yes-no questions in French. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 351, 427–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, M., & Watson, D. G
(2010) Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 251, 905–945. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Hansen, Marie, Clara Huttenlauch, Carola de Beer, Isabell Wartenburger & Sandra Hanne
2023. Individual Differences in Early Disambiguation of Prosodic Grouping. Language and Speech 66:3 ► pp. 706 ff. DOI logo
O'Brien, Mary Grantham
2022. Making the Teaching of Suprasegmentals Accessible. In Second Language Pronunciation, ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.