Article published in:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 4:4 (2014) ► pp. 405431
Cited by

Cited by 24 other publications

Azazil, Lina
2020. Frequency effects in the L2 acquisition of the catenative verb construction – evidence from experimental and corpus data . Cognitive Linguistics 31:3  pp. 417 ff. Crossref logo
Crossley, Scott A., Stephen Skalicky, Kristopher Kyle & Katia Monteiro
2019. ABSOLUTE FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEXICAL ACQUISITION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:04  pp. 721 ff. Crossref logo
Ellis, Nick C., Matthew Brook O'Donnell & Ute Römer
2015.  In The Handbook of Language Emergence,  pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo
Gardner, Sheena
2018.  In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Hall, Christopher J., Jack Joyce & Chris Robson
2017. Investigating the lexico-grammatical resources of a non-native user of English: The case of can and could in email requests . Applied Linguistics Review 8:1  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Şeyda Özçalışkan
Matusevych, Yevgen, Afra Alishahi & Ad Backus
2016. Modelling verb selection within argument structure constructions. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31:10  pp. 1215 ff. Crossref logo
2017. The impact of first and second language exposure on learning second language constructions. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:1  pp. 128 ff. Crossref logo
Monteiro, Kátia R, Crossley, Scott A & Kyle, Kristopher
2020. In Search of New Benchmarks: Using L2 Lexical Frequency and Contextual Diversity Indices to Assess Second Language Writing. Applied Linguistics 41:2  pp. 280 ff. Crossref logo
Paquot, Magali
2017. L1 frequency in foreign language acquisition: Recurrent word combinations in French and Spanish EFL learner writing. Second Language Research 33:1  pp. 13 ff. Crossref logo
Paquot, Magali
2018.  In The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology,  pp. 359 ff. Crossref logo
Rastelli, Stefano
2021. Intra-language: the study of L2 morpheme productivity as within-item variance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Römer, Ute
2016. Teaming up and mixing methods: collaborative and cross-disciplinary work in corpus research on phraseology. Corpora 11:1  pp. 113 ff. Crossref logo
Römer, Ute & James R. Garner
2019. The development of verb constructions in spoken learner English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:2  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
Römer, Ute, Matthew Brook O'Donnell & Nick C. Ellis
2014. Second Language Learner Knowledge of Verb-Argument Constructions: Effects of Language Transfer and Typology. The Modern Language Journal 98:4  pp. 952 ff. Crossref logo
Römer, Ute, Stephen C. Skalicky & Nick C. Ellis
2018. Verb-argument constructions in advanced L2 English learner production: Insights from corpora and verbal fluency tasks. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0 Crossref logo
Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna
2015. Collocation in beginner learner writing: A longitudinal study. System 53  pp. 148 ff. Crossref logo
Smith, Sara A.
2021. Exploring knowledge of transparent and non-transparent multi-word phrases among L2 English learners living in an Anglophone setting. System 101  pp. 102590 ff. Crossref logo
Torres-Martínez, Sergio
2018. Exploring attachment patterns between multi-word verbs and argument structure constructions. Lingua 209  pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
Trahey, Martha & Nina Spada
2020. Focusing on Language and Content with Adolescent English Language Learners in the Mainstream Classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review 76:3  pp. 218 ff. Crossref logo
Wu, Tianqi & Min Wang
2020. Development of the progressive construction in Chinese EFL learners’ written production: From prototypes to marginal members. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0 Crossref logo
Yi, Wei
2018. STATISTICAL SENSITIVITY, COGNITIVE APTITUDES, AND PROCESSING OF COLLOCATIONS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:4  pp. 831 ff. Crossref logo
Zeldes, Amir
2018.  In Usage-inspired L2 Instruction [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 49],  pp. 237 ff. Crossref logo
2018. Effects of entrenchment and preemption in second language learners’ acceptance of English denominal verbs. Applied Psycholinguistics 39:2  pp. 413 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.



Allan, L. G.
(1980) A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15(3), 147–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. R.
(1983) A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Cognitive psychology and its implications (5th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Battig, W. R., & Montague, W. E.
(1969) Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 80(3), 1–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bird, S., Loper, E., & Klein, E.
(2009) Natural language processing with Python. Cambridge, MA: O’Reilly Media Inc.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. K., & Goldberg, A. E.
(2009) Input effects within a constructionist framework. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 418–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A., & Gullberg, M.
(2008) Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1-L2 encoding of manner in speech and gesture. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(2), 225–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Changes in encoding of path of motion after acquisition of a second language. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(2), 263–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2008) Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2010) Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref[ p. 427 ]Google Scholar
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P.
(Eds.) (2001) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T.
(2008) Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 239–274). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N.
(Eds.) (2001) Connectionist psycholinguistics. Westport, CO: Ablex.Google Scholar
Collins, L., & Ellis, N. C.
(2009) Input and second language construction learning: frequency, form, and function. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), Whole issue . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E.
(2009) Words as constructions. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 201–223). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V.
(2010) Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(1998) Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning, 48(4), 631–664. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 33–68). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006a) Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008a) Optimizing the input: Frequency and sampling in Usage-based and Form-focussed Learning. In M. H. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2008b) Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T.
(2009) Constructing a second language. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(Special section) , 111–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F.
(2009a) Construction Learning as a function of Frequency, Frequency Distribution, and Function. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 370–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 111–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2009) Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning, 59(Supplement 1) , 93–128. Crossref[ p. 428 ]Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & O’Donnell, M. B.
(2011) Robust language acquisition – an emergent consequence of language as a complex adaptive system. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 3512–3517). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
(2012) Statistical construction learning: Does a Zipfian problem space ensure robust language learning? In J. Rebuschat & J. Williams (Eds.), Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U.
(2014) The processing of verb-argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality. Cognitive Linguistics 25(1), 55–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R.
(1998) Rules or associations in the acquisition of morphology? The frequency by regularity interaction in human and PDP learning of morphosyntax. Language & Cognitive Processes, 13(2&3), 307–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evert, S.
(2005) The statistics of word cooccurrences: Word pairs and collocations. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fox, J.
(2002) Robust regression. Appendix to an R And S-Plus Companion To Applied Regression. http://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/doc​/contrib​/Fox​-Companion​/appendix​-robust​-regression​.pdf Google Scholar
(2003) Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. Journal of Statistical Software, 8(15), 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francis, G., Hunston, S., & Manning, E.
(Eds.) (1996) Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. The COBUILD Series. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Selinker, L.
(Eds.) (1983) Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N.
(2004) Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3), 289–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T.
(2007) Coll.analysis 3.2. A program for R for Windows 2.x.Google Scholar
(2012) Frequencies, probabilities, association measures in usage-/exemplar-based linguistics: some necessary clarifications. Studies in Language, 36(3), 477–510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) 50-something years of work on collocations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(1), 137–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A.
(2004) Extending collostructional analysis: a corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S.
(2005) Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3(1), 182–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Psycholinguistic and corpus linguistic evidence for L2 constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 164–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grömping, U.
(2006) Relative Importance for Linear Regression in R: The Package relaimpo. Journal of Statistical Software, 17, 1–27.[ p. 429 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harnad, S.
(Ed.) (1987) Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, C.
(1980) Contrastive analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lado, R.
(1957) Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
(1964) Language teaching: A scientific approach. New York: McGraw-Hill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
(2008) Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 168–196). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(1987) The competition model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Emergentist approaches to language. In J. Bybee, & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 449–470). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R.
(1984) Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23(2), 127–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malvern, D., Richards, B. J., Chipere, N., & Duran, P.
(2004) Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & De Vleeschauwer, J.
(2012) Prompt type frequency, auditory pattern discrimination, and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 355–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A.
(2009) WordNet - About us. Retrieved on March 1 2010, from Princeton University http://​wordnet​.princeton​.edu Google Scholar
Newell, A.
(1990) Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ninio, A.
(1999) Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 26(3), 619–653. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T.
(1989) Language transfer. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Conceptual transfer and meaning extensions. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 306–340). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
(2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://​www​.R​-project​.org/ Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N.
(Eds.) (2012) Statistical learning and language acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R.
(1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C.
(2008a) Conclusion: cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and L2 instruction—issues for research. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 489–545). London: Routledge.[ p. 430 ]Google Scholar
(Eds.) (2008b) A handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Römer, U., O’Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C.
(2014) Second language learner knowledge of verb-argument constructions: Effects of language transfer and typology. The Modern Language Journal, 98 (4) , 952–975. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Römer, U., O’Donnell, M., & Ellis, N. C.
in press). Using COBUILD grammar patterns for a large-scale analysis of verb-argument constructions: Exploring corpus data and speaker knowledge. In M. Charles, N. Groom & S. John Eds. Corpora, Grammar, Text and Discourse: In Honour of Susan Hunston Amsterdam John Benjamins Crossref
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B.
(1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P.
(1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, D. R.
(1995) The psychology of associative learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
(1996) From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T.
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
(2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R.
(1998) Syntactic constructions as prototype categories. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 177–202). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Trousdale, G., & Hoffmann, T.
(Eds.) (2013) Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tweedie, F. J., & Baayen, R. H.
(1998) How variable may a constant be? measures of lexical richness in perspective. Computers and the Humanities, 32, 323–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G. K.
(1935) The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: The M. I. T. Press.[ p. 431 ]Google Scholar