Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 5:1 (2015) ► pp.91–121

Colliding vowel systems in Andean Spanish

Carryovers and emergent properties

 | Pennsylvania State University
The acquisition of the Spanish 5-vowel system by speakers of the 3-vowel language Quechua (/I/-/a/-/ʊ/) seldom results in accurate approximation to Spanish vowel spaces when learning takes place informally in post-adolescence. The present study offers data from a minimal immersion environment in northern Ecuador. In a context in which few cues point to the existence of mid-high vocalic oppositions in Spanish (e.g. no literacy, no corrective feedback, almost no viable minimal pairs), these speakers reliably distinguish only three Spanish vowels in production. These Quechua-dominant bilinguals have amorphous front and back vowel spaces considerably broader than those defining Quechua /I/ and /ʊ/, but with no bimodal clustering. Left relatively unfettered, the hybrid system may contribute to an understanding of the relationship between vowel inventory and vowel space topology.
Keywords: Andean Spanish, Spanish vowels, Quechua language, vowel spaces, second language acquisition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Vowel spaces: inventories and topologies
    • 1.2Spanish-Quechua bilingualism
  • 2.Previous studies of Quechua-influenced Spanish vowel systems
  • 3.Data collection
    • 3.1The setting
    • 3.2Participants
    • 3.3Procedure
    • 3.4Obtaining baseline data
  • 4.Formant data extraction
    • 4.1Procedure
    • 4.2Normalization
    • 4.3Exclusions
    • 4.4Accommodations
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Baseline Spanish and Quechua vowels
    • 5.2Spanish vowel spaces of Quechua-dominant bilinguals
    • 5.3Dispersion of vowel tokens
    • 5.4Possible emergent height harmony
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Under-differentiation of Spanish mid and high vowels
    • 6.2Vowel (mis)identification as a function of F0 and F1
    • 6.3For the future: further possible emergent traits
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 May 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.5.1.04lip
References (143)
References
Adank, P., Smits, R., & van Hout, R. (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1161, 3099–3107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, W.A. (1975). Intrinsic and extrinsic factors in vowel judgements. In G. Fant, & M. Tatham (Eds.), Auditory analysis and perception of speech (pp. 103–113). London & New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alfonso, P., & Baer, T. (1982). Dynamics of vowel articulation. Language and Speech, 251, 151–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al-Tamimi, J.-E., & Ferragne, E. (2005). Does vowel space size depend on language vowel inventories? Evidence from two Arabic dialects and French. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH), Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 2465–2468). [URL]
Anderson, R., & Smith, B. (1987). Phonological development of two-year-old monolingual Puerto Rican Spanish-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 141, 57–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andronis, M.A. (2004). Iconization, fractal recursivity, and erasure: Linguistic ideologies and standardization in Quichua-speaking Ecuador. Texas Linguistic Forum, 471, 263–269.Google Scholar
Assmann, Peter, & Nearey, T. (2008). Identification of frequency-shifted vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1241, 3203–3212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, W., & Trofimovich, P. (2005).Interaction of native- and second-language vowel system(s) in early and late bilinguals. Language and Speech, 481, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker-Kristal, R. (2010). Acoustic typology of vowel inventories and Dispersion Theory: insights from a large cross-linguistic corpus. Ph. D. dissertation, UCLA.
Beddor, P., & Hawkins, S. (1990). The influence of spectral prominence on perceived vowel quality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 871, 2684–2704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, B.H., & Stemberger, J. (1998). Handbook of phonological development from the perspective of constraint-based nonlinear phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (1999–2005). PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer. [URL]
Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. (1990). Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 111, 303–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosch, L., & Ramón-Casas, M. (2011). Variability in vowel production by bilingual speakers: Can input properties hinder the early stabilization of contrastive categories? Journal of Phonetics, 391, 514–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. (1995). A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 971, 1916–1924. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A., Torretta, G., & Pisoni, D. (1996). Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication, 201, 255–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cachimuel, G. (2001). “Vuelta arriba acabamos la escuela. Vuelta abajo no podemos”: opiniones de la comunidad educativa frente a la EIB en una comunidad del Ecuador. Masters’ thesis, Universidad Mayor de San Simón, Cochabamba, Bolivia.
Carlson, R., Fant, G., & Granström, B. (1975). Two-formant models, pitch and vowel perception. In G. Fant, & M. Tatham (Eds.), Auditory analysis and perception of speech (pp. 55–82). London & New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cebrian, J. (2006). Experience and the use of non-native duration in L2 vowel categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 341, 372–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, R. (1975). La motosidad y sus implicancias para la enseñanza del castellano. In M. Quintana, & D. Sánchez (Eds.), Aportes para la enseñanza del lenguaje (pp. 125–165). Lima: Retablo de Papel Ediciones.Google Scholar
. (1989). Aspectos sociolingüísticos y pedagógicos de la motosidad en el Perú. In R. Cerrón-Palomino, & G. Solís Fonseca (Eds.), Temas de lingüística amerindia (pp. 153–180). Lima: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología.Google Scholar
Chistovich, L.A., & Lublinskaja, V.V. (1979). The center of gravity effect in vowel spectra and critical distance between the formants. Hearing Research, 11, 185–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, J., Linebaugh, G., Munson, C., & McMurray, B. (2010). Unmasking the acoustic effects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: A statistical modeling approach. Journal of Phonetics, 381, 167–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, P. (1982). Imbabura Quechua. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
DeBoer, B. (2000). Self-organization in vowel systems. Journal of Phonetics, 281, 441–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delforge, A.M. (2008). Unstressed vowel reduction in Andean Spanish. In L. Colantoni, & J. Steele (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology (pp. 108–124). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings.Google Scholar
Del Valle Caviedes, J. (1947). Obras. Lima: Tipografía Peruana.Google Scholar
Disner, S.F. (1980). Evaluation of vowel normalization procedures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 671, 253–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engstrand, O., & Krull, D. (1991). Effect of inventory size on the distribution of vowels in the formant space: preliminary data for seven languages. PERILUS, 131, 15–18.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 261, 551–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ewan, W. (1979). Can intrinsic vowel F0 be explained by source/tract coupling? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 661, 358–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, A., Watt, D., & Johnson, D.E. (2009). A comparison of three speaker-intrinsic vowel formant frequency normalization algorithms for sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change, 211, 413–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fahey, R. (1994). Perception of back vowel height: effects of varying F1 — F0 Bark distance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 951, 2978. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fahey, R., & López-Bascuas, L. (1994). The perception of vowel height in Castilian Spanish: Effects of varying F1-F0 Bark distance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 961, 3283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fant, G. (1978). Vowel perception and specification. Rivista Italiana di Fonetica, 21, 69–84.Google Scholar
Fee, E. (1991). Underspecification, parameters, and the acquisition of vowels. Ph. D. dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Ferrari-Disner, S. (1983). Vowel quality: The relation between Universal and Language-specific Factors. Ph. D. dissertation, UCLA.
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1990). Intrinsic F0 in tense and lax vowels with special reference to German. Phonetica, 47(3–4), 99–140. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (1989). Differences in inventory size affect the location but not the precision of tongue positioning in vowel production. Language and Speech, 321, 123–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1993). Production and perception of a novel second-language phonetic contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 931, 1589–1608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 233–272). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J., & MacKay, I. (2004). Perceiving foreign vowels. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 261, 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., MacKay, I., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1061, 2973–2987. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Florén, Å. (1978–9). Why does [a] change to [ɔ] when F0 is increased? In B. Lindblom, & J. Lubker (Eds.), Experiments in speech perception (pp. 13–23). Stockholm: University of Stockholm Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P., & Docherty, G. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 341, 409–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C. (1981). Production and perception of coarticulation among stressed and unstressed vowels. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 461, 127–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Parsing coarticulated speech in perception: Effects of coarticulation resistance. Journal of Phonetics, 331, 199–213 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C., & Brancazio, L. (2000). Coarticulation resistance of American English consonants and its effects on transconsonantal vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. Language and Speech, 431, 1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldinger, S. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 1051, 251–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, B., & Cintrón, P. (2001). An investigation of phonological skills in Puerto Rican Spanish-speaking 2-year-olds. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 151, 343–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, B., & Pollock, K. (2000). Vowel errors in Spanish-speaking children with phonological disorders: A retrospective, comparative study. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 141, 217–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez Rendón, J. (2008). Mestizaje lingüístico en los Andes: génesis y estructura de una lengua mixta. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A. (1981). A descriptive study of phonological development in normal-speaking Puerto-Rican preschooolers. Ed.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
Gonzalez, G. (1983). The acquisition of Spanish sounds in the speech of 2-year-old Chicano children. In R. Padilla (Ed.), Theory technology and public policy on bilingual education (pp. 73–87). Rosslyn, VA: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.Google Scholar
Guion, S. (2003). The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals: Age of acquisition effects on the mutual influence of the first and second languages. Phonetica, 601, 98–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guion, S., Flege, J., & Loftin, J. (2000). The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 281, 27–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gulinello, F. (2010). A longitudinal investigation of vowel acquisition. In J. Levis, & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Iowa State University, Sept. 2009 (pp. 90–104). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Haboud, M., & De la Vega, E. (2008). Ecuador. In A. Palacios (Ed.), El español en América: contactos lingüísticos en Hispanoamérica (pp. 161–187). Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S. (2003). Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics, 311, 373–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, J., Clark, M., & Nearey, T. (2001). Effects of consonant environment on vowel formant patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1091, 748–763. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, J., & Gayvert, R. (1993). Vowel classification based on fundamental frequency and formant frequencies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 361, 694–700. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L., Clark, M., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 971, 3099–3111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoemeke, K., & Diehl, R. 1994. Perception of vowel height: The rolf of F1-F0 distance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 961, 661–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hombert, J.-M. (1977). Development of tones from vowel height? Journal of Phonetics, 51, 9–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, A., & Fairbanks, G. (1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 251, 105–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huffman, M. (1986). Patterns of coarticulation in English. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 631, 26–47.Google Scholar
Icaza, J. (1934). Huasipungo. Quito: Imprenta Nacional.Google Scholar
Ito, M., Tsuchida, J., & Yano, M. (2001). On the effectiveness of whole spectral shape for vowel identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1101, 1141–1149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K., & Mullenix, J. (Eds.). (1997). Talker variability in speech processing. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kewley-Port, D. (2001). Vowel formant discrimination II: Effects of stimulus uncertainty, consonantal context, and training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1101, 2141–2155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kewley-Port, D., & Atal, B. (1989). Perceptual differences between vowels located in a limited phonetic space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 851, 1726–1740. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kewley-Port, D., & Zheng, Y. (1999). Vowel formant discrimination: Towards more ordinary listening conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1061, 2945–2958. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, K., & Haboud, M. (2002). Language planning and policy in Ecuador. Current Issues in Language Planning, 31, 359–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P., & Iverson, P. (1995). Linguistic experience and the `Perceptual Magnet effect’. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: issues in cross-language research (pp. 121–154). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Karen, M., & Miller, C. (1991). Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast. Language Variation and Change, 31, 33–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D.R., & Silverman, K. (1984). Vowel intrinsic pitch in connected speech. Phonetica, 411, 31–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1989). A note on ‘Information conveyed by vowels’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 851, 2223–2234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D.E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 291, 98–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lang, C.E., & Ohala, J.J. (1996, October). Temporal cues for vowels and universals of vowel inventories. In Spoken Language, 1996. ICSLP 96. Proceedings., Fourth International Conference on (Vol. 1, pp. 434–437). IEEE. DOI logo
Lehiste, I., & Peterson. G. (1961). Some basic considerations in the analysis of intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 331, 419–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B., & Engstrand, O. (1989). In what sense is speech quantal? Journal of Phonetics, 171, 107–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linebaugh, G. (2007). Phonetic grounding and phonology: Vowel backness harmony and vowel height harmony. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
Lipski, J. (1990). Aspects of Ecuadorian vowel reduction. Hispanic Linguistics, 41, 1–19.Google Scholar
. (2013). ¿Qué diciendo nomás? tracing the sources of the Andean Spanish gerund. Spanish in Context, 101, 227–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, J. (2003). Vowel category distribution determines weighting of acoustic cues. Ms., SUNY Stony Brook.
Macken, M. (1979). Developmental reorganization of phonology: A hierarchy of basic units of acquisition. Lingua, 491, 11–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magen, H.S. (1997). The extent of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 187–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maez, L.F. (1985). The acquisition of the Spanish sound system by native Spanish-speaking children. In E. Garcia, & R. Padilla (Eds.) Advances in bilingual education research (pp. 3–26). Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Manrique, A.M. Borzone de, & Signorini, A. (1983). Segmental duration and rhythm in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 111, 117–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manuel, S. (1990). The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 881, 1286–1298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). Cross-language studies: Relating language-particular coarticulation patterns to other language-particular facts. In W. Hardcastle, & N. Hewlett (Eds.), Coarticulaiion: Theory, data, and techniques (pp. 179–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J., & Bunnell, H.T. (1981). Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 691, 559–567 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendez, A. (1982). Production of American English and Spanish vowels. Language and Speech, 251, 191–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meunier, C., Frenck-Mestre, C., Lelekov-Boissard, T., & Le Besnerais, M. (2003). Production and perception of vowels: does the density of the system play a role?. In Proceedings of International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS) (pp. 723–726). Université Autonome de Barcelone.
Miller, R.L. (1953). Auditory tests with synthetic vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 251, 114–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitterer, H. (2006). Is vowel normalization independent of lexical processing? Phonetica, 631, 209–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monroy Casas, R. (1980). Aspectos fonéticos de las vocales españolas. Madrid: Sociedad General Española de Librería.Google Scholar
Morrison, G. (2008). L1-Spanish speakers’ acquisition of the English /i/–/I/ contrast: Duration-based perception is not the initial developmental stage. Language and Speech, 511, 285–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). L1-Spanish speakers’ acquisition of the English /i/-/I/ contrast II: perception of vowel inherent spectral change. Language and Speech, 521, 437–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morrison, G., & Escudero, P. (2007). A cross-dialect comparison of Peninsula- and Peruvian-Spanish vowels. In J. Trouvain, & W.J. Berry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences: Saarbrücken 2007 (pp.1505–1508). Saarbrücken, Germany: Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. (1981). Halfway between Quechua and Spanish: The case for relexification. In A. Valdman, & A. Highfield (Eds.), Theoretical orientations in creole studies (pp. 52–78). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. (1989). Media Lengua and linguistic theory. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 331, 409–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1997). Media Lengua. In S. Thomason (Ed.), Contact languages: A wider perspective (pp. 365–426). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napurí Espejo, R.A. (2011). Categorización de vocales anteriores por hablantes bilingües quechua-español. Licenciatura thesis, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Navarro Tomás, T. (1916). Cantidad de las vocales acentuadas. Revista de Filología Española, 31, 387–407.Google Scholar
. (1917). Cantidad de las vocales inacentuadas. Revista de Filología Española, 41, 371–388.Google Scholar
Nearey, T. (1989). Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 851, 2088–2113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, N., Wauquier, S., & Tuller, B. 2009. The dynamical approach to speech perception: From fine phonetic detail to abstract phonological categories. In F. Pellegrino, E. Marisco, I. Chotoran, & C. Coupé (Eds.), Approaches to phonological complexity (pp. 5–31). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, J., & Eukel, B. (1987). Explaining the intrinsic pitch of vowels. In R. Channon, & L. Shockey (Eds.), In honor of Ilse Lehiste (pp. 207–215). Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Öhman, S.E.G. (1966). Coarticulation in VCV utterances: Spectrographic measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 391, 151–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez Andrade, M. (1969). Huasipungo: versión teatral de la novela de Jorge Icaza. Quito: Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, E. (2004). Peak placement in two regional varieties of Peruvian Spanish intonation. In J. Auger, J.C. Clements, & B. Vance (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to Romance linguistics (LSRL 33) (pp. 321–341). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Intonation and language contact: A case study of two varieties of Peruvian Spanish. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
. (2010). Dialect differences and the bilingual vowel space in Peruvian Spanish. In M. Ortega-Llebaria (Ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology (pp. 20–30). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. [URL].Google Scholar
Pardo y Aliaga, P. (1973). Poesías. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pérez Silva, J., Acurio, J., & Benedezú, R. (2008). Contra el prejuicio lingüístico de la motosidad. Un estudio de las vocales del castellano andino desde la fonética acústica. Lima: Instituto Riva-Agüero, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Pérez Silva, J.I., & Zavala Cisneros, V. (2010). Aspectos cognitivos e ideológicos del ‘motoseo’ en el Perú. América en la Lengua Española, V Congreso Internacional de la Lengua Española, Valparaiso, Chile 2010. [URL].Google Scholar
Petersen, N.R. (1978). Intrinsic fundamental frequency of Danish vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 61, 177–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1986). Perceptual compensation for segmentally conditioned fundamental frequency perturbation. Phonetica, 431, 31–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, G., & Barney, H. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 241, 175–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech, 461, 115–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, D.B. (1981). Variability of vowel formant frequencies and the quantal theory of speech: a first report. Phonetica, 37(5–6), 285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, R.K., & Steinberg, J.C. (1950). Toward the specification of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 221, 807–820. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recasens, D. (1984). Vowel to vowel coarticulation in Catalan V-C-V sequences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 761, 1624–1635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recasens, D., & Pallarès, M.D. (2000). A study of F1 coarticulation in VCV sequences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 431, 501–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rindstedt, C., & Aronsson, K. (2002). Growing up monolingual in a bilingual community: The Quichua revitalization paradox. Language in Society, 311, 721–742. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, S. (1989). The intrinsic pitch of vowels: Theoretical, physiological, and clinical considerations. Journal of Voice, 31, 44–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, J.-L., Boë, L.-J., Vallée, N., & Abry, C. (1997). The Dispersion-Focalization theory of vowel systems. Journal of Phonetics, 251, 255–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skelton, R. (1969). The pattern of Spanish vowel sounds. IRAL (International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 71, 231–237.Google Scholar
Slawson, A.W. (1968). Vowel quality and musical timbre as functions of spectrum envelope and fundamental frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 431, 87–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, K.N. (1989). On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of phonetics, 171, 3–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J. (2011). A brief descriptive grammar of Pijal Media Lengua and an acoustic vowel space analysis of Pijal Media Lengua and Imbabura Quichua. M. A. thesis, University of Manitoba.
Syrdal, A., & Gopal, H.S. (1986). A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 791, 1086–1100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tenenholtz, E. (1978–9). Vowel identification as a function of increasing fundamental frequency. In B. Lindblom, & J. Lubker (Eds.), Experiments in speech perception (pp. 38–48). Stockholm: University of Stockholm Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Thomas, E.R., & Kendall, T. (2007). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. Online Reso urce: [URL]. {accessed 1 February 2015}
Traunmüller, H. (1981). Perceptual dimension of openness in vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 691, 1465–1475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1990). Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 881, 97–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Umeda, N. (1981). Influence of segmental factors on fundamental frequency in fluent speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 701, 350–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallace, A., & Blumstein, S. (2009). Temporal integration in vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1251, 1704–1711. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whalen, D.H. (1990). Coarticulation is largely planned. Journal of Phonetics, 181, 3–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zavala, V. (1999). Reconsideraciones en torno al castellano andino. Lexis, 231, 25–85.Google Scholar
Zwicker, E., & Terhardt, E. (1980). Analytical expressions for critical band rate and critical bandwidths as a function of frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 681, 1523–1525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Baird, Brandon O.
2020. The vowel spaces of Spanish-K’ichee’ bilinguals. In Spanish Phonetics and Phonology in Contact [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 28], ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Emlen, Nicholas Q.
2020. The many Spanishes of an Andean-Amazonian crossroads. In Amazonian Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 23], ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Stewart, Jesse
2018. Vowel perception by native Media Lengua, Quichua, and Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics 71 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Lipski, John M.
2016. On the tenacity of Andean Spanish. In Spanish Language and Sociolinguistic Analysis [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 8], ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Lipski, John M.
2020. Can a bilingual lexicon be sustained by phonotactics alone?. The Mental Lexicon 15:2 ► pp. 330 ff. DOI logo
Lipski, John M.
2020. A tale of two lexical-decision tasks. Language Ecology 4:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Lipski, John M.
2022. The Emergence andEvolution of Romance Languages in Europe and the Americas. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 427 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Emergence and Spread of Some European Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 425 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.