Commentary published In:
Epistemological issue with keynote article “The role of language processing in language acquisition” by Colin Phillips and Lara Ehrenhofer[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4] 2015
► pp. 454–458
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4] 2015
► pp. 454–458
Commentary
Why less is eventually more in second language acquisition
References
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K
(2008) The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481–509. 
(2009) Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306.
Asher, J.J., & García, R
(1969) The optimal age to learn a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 531, 334–341.
Birdsong, D
(1992) Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68(4), 706–755.
Coppieters, R
(1987) Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 631, 544–573.
DeKeyser, R.M
(2000) The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–533.
(2012) Age effects in second language learning. In S. Gass, & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 442–460). London: Routledge.
DeKeyser, R.M., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D
(2010) Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(3), 413–438.
Ferman, S., & Karni, A
(2010) No childhood advantage in the acquisition of skill in using an artificial language rule. PLOS One, 5(10), 1–10.
Gathercole, S.E
(1999) Cognitive approaches to the development of short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(11), 410–418.
Gathercole, S.E., Pickering, S.J., Ambridge, B., & Wearing, H
(2004) The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 177–190.
Hyltenstam, K
(1988) Lexical characteristics of near-native second-language learners of Swedish. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 91, 67–84.
Johnson, J.S., & Newport, E.L
(1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 211, 60–99.
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M
(1995) Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 483–516.
Lenneberg, E.H
(1967) Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
McDonald, J.L
(2006) Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 551, 381–401.
Monner, D., Vatz, K., Morini, G., Hwang, S.-O., & DeKeyser, R
(2013) A neural network model of the effects of entrenchment and memory development on grammatical gender learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 246–265.
Patkowski, M.S
(1980) The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 301, 449–472.
Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L
(2015) The role of language processing in language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 51.
Snow, C.E., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M
(1978) The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 491, 1114–1128.
Vatz, K
(2009) Grammatical gender representation and processing in advanced second language learners of French. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.