Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

de Villiers, Jill, Jessica Kotfila & Tom Roeper
2020.  In New Trends in Language Acquisition Within the Generative Perspective [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 49],  pp. 239 ff. Crossref logo
de Villiers, Jill G., Jessica Kotfila & Madeline Klein
2019.  In Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 63],  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.



Chomsky, N.
(1998) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clifton, C., & Frazier, L.
(1985) The use of syntactic information in filling gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 209–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J.G.
(2010) On building up a sufficient representation for belief: Tense, Point of View and Wh-movement. In J. Costa, A. Castro, M. Lobo, & Fernanda Pratas (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of Gala 2009 (pp. 121–134). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars press.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J.G., & Roeper, T.
(1995) Relative clauses are barriers to Wh-movement for young children. Journal of Child Language, 22, 389–404. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J.G., Roeper, T., Bland-Stewart, L., & Pearson, B.
(2008) Answering hard questions: Wh-movement across dialects and disorder. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 67–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J.G., Roeper, T., & Vainikka, A.
(1990) The acquisition of long distance rules. In L. Frazier, & J.G. de Villiers (Eds.), Language Processing and Acquisition (pp. 257–298) Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J.G., de Villiers, P.A., & Roeper, T.
(2010) Wh-questions: Moving beyond the first Phase. Lingua, 121(3), 352–366 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J.G., Roeper, T., Harrington, E., & Gadilauskas, E.
(2012) Tense and truth in children’s question answering. In A. Biller, E. Chung, & A. Kimball (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 152–163). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Fanselow, G.
(2005) Partial wh-movement. In M. Everaert, & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 3. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grebenyova, L.
(2006) Multiple interrogatives: Syntax, semantics and learnability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Maryland.
Grohe, L., Schulz, P., & Müller, A.
(2011) How children „Copy” long-distance structures: The production of complex Wh-questions in German. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 233–245). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lee, I-J., & Lee, D.
(2012) On the acquisition of wh-scope marking in Korean-English interlanguage. Language and Linguistics, 57, 159–196[ p. 464 ]Google Scholar
McDaniel, D.
(1989) Partial and multiple wh-movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7, 565–604. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A.
(2010) Commitment and flexibility in the developing parser. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Omaki, A., Davidson White, I., Goro, T., Lidz, J., & Phillips, C.
(2014) No fear of commitment: Children’s incremental interpretation in English and Japanese wh-questions. Language Learning and Development, 10, 206–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L.
(2015) The role of language processing in language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roeper, T. & de Villiers, J. G.
(1991) Ordered decisions in the acquisition of wh-questions. In H. Goodluck, J. Weissenborn & T. Roeper (eds.) Theoretical issues in language development. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Roeper, T., & de Villiers, J.G.
(1994) Lexical links in the Wh-chain. In B. Lust, G. Hermon, & J. Kornfilt (eds.), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: Cross linguistic perspectives volume II: Binding, dependencies and learnability (pp. 357–390). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The acquisition path for wh-questions. In J.G. de Villiers & T. Roeper (Eds.), Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition (pp. 189–246). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, H., Roeper, T., & de Villiers, J.
(2005) The DELV-NR. (Norm-referenced version) The diagnostic evaluation of language variation. The psychological corporation, San Antonio.Google Scholar
Slavkov, N.
(2009) The acquisition of complex wh-questions in the L2 English of Canadian French and Bulgarian speakers: Medial wh-constructions, inversion phenomena, and avoidance strategies. Ubpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Ottawa.
Thornton, R.
(1991) Adventures in long distance moving: The acquisition of wh-questions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Turrero-Garcia, M.
(2013) “¿Cómo dijo a quién decidió elegir?” Second Language Learners’ interpretation of medial wh-questions. Journal of Second and Multiple Language Acquisition, 1(2), 49–67.Google Scholar
Yang, C.
(2011) Computational models of syntactic acquisition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2012(3), 205–213.Google Scholar