References

References

Chomsky, N.
(1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1970) Remarks on Nominalization. In R. Jacobs, & P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar (pp. 184–221). Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Cocchi, G., & Pierantozzi, C.
(2015) Nominal gender and agreement relation outside the DP domain in code-switching contexts. Paper presented at EuroSLA 25, University of Aix-en-Provence.
(2016) Code-switching in relative clauses: some theoretical implications. Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali/. Working Papers in Linguistics and Oriental Studies (QULSO), 2, 97–121.Google Scholar
Halle, M.
(1997) Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In B. Bruening, Y. Kang, & M. McGinnis (Eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (pp. 425–449). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A.
(1994) Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale, & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., Müller de Quadros, R., & Chen Pichler, D.
(2016) The development of bimodal bilingualism: Implications for linguistic theory. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(6), 719–755. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacSwan, J.
(2000) The architecture of the bilingual language faculty: Evidence from intrasentential code switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(1), 37–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S., Pausada, A., & Sankoff, D.
(1982) Competing influences on gender assignment: variable process, stable outcome. Lingua, 57, 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S., & Meechan, M.
(1995) Orphan categories in bilingual discourse: Adjectivization strategies in Wolof-French and Fongbe-French. Language Variation and Change, 7(2), 169–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L.
(2000) Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar