Corpus Stylistics as Contextual Prosodic Theory and Subtext

| University of Zimbabwe
| University of Belgrade
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027234124 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027267351 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
The volume presents Louw's Contextual Prosodic Theory from its beginnings to its newest applications. It journeys from delexicalisation and relexicalisation into Semantic Prosody and then to the heart of its contextual requirements within collocation and the thinking of J.R. Firth. Once there, it moves much of Firth’s and Malinowski’s thinking into a computational method based upon the ability of language to govern and analyse itself using collocation to plot its scope and limits. With the assistance of analytic philosophy, it parts logic (grammar) from metaphysics (vocabulary) along the lines of a non-computational formula of Bertrand Russell, and so falsifies the major premise of the Vienna Circle using its own central tenet: the Principle of Verification. Having arrived at corpus-derived subtext (the semantic aura of grammar strings, as distinguished from Semantic Prosody), the second half of the book proceeds to verify the theory on Slavic languages. The focus is on the poet Alexander Pushkin, whose authorial intention becomes computationally recoverable. Prose is handled on samples authored by David Lodge, where authorial (in)sincerity (Louw 1993) is viewed on a cline of inspiration and quality of discourse. Other applications in the volume include studies on translation, negotiation, humour, and the reception of CPT.
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 23]  2016.  xix, 419 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“The term corpus stylistics, usually regarded as a near-synonym for stylometry, stylometrics, statistical stylistics, or stylogenetics, is closely related to statistics and corpus linguistics. Despite an increasing number of studies in the field, people still do not attain a clear line of demarcation between corpus linguistics and corpus stylistics. Corpus linguists are typically concerned with “repeated occurrences, generalizations and the description of typical patterns,” while corpus stylistic studies relate to “deviations from linguistic norms that account for the artistic effects of a particular text” (Mahlberg, “Corpus Stylistic Perspective” 19). However, more needs to be known about what new perspectives corpus linguistics can offer to the depiction of stylistic devices and the interpretation of stylistic values. Under these circumstances, Bill Louw and Marija Milojkovic’s Corpus Stylistics as Contextual Prosodic Theory and Subtext is instructive and worthy of reading, for it offers valuable perspectives for interdisciplinary investigations.”
Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

No author info given
2016.  In Language, Discourse, Style [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 22], Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Intertextuality in Practice [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 33], Crossref logo
Auer, Anita, Victorina González-Díaz, Jane Hodson & Violeta Sotirova
2016.  In Linguistics and Literary History [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 25],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Cloutier, Robert, Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Radosław Święciński, Gea Dreschler, Sune Gregersen, Beáta Gyuris, Kathryn Allan, Maggie Scott, Lieselotte Anderwald, Alexander Kautzsch, Sven Leuckert, Tihana Kraš, Alessia Cogo, Tian Gan, Ida Parise & Jessica Norledge
2018. IEnglish Language. The Year's Work in English Studies 97:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Louw, Bill
2020.  In Corpus-based Approaches to Grammar, Media and Health Discourses [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ],  pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Lugea, Jane
2017. The year’s work in stylistics 2016. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4  pp. 340 ff. Crossref logo
McIntyre, Dan
2018.  In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 30],  pp. 81 ff. Crossref logo
Milojkovic, Marija
2020. Is the truthfulness of a proposition verifiable through access to reference corpora?. Journal of Literary Semantics 49:2  pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
Milojkovic, Marija & Bill Louw
2017.  In Essential Competencies for English-medium University Teaching [Educational Linguistics, 27],  pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo
Omidian, Taha & Anna Siyanova‐Chanturia
2020. Semantic Prosody Revisited: Implications for Language Learning. TESOL Quarterly 54:2  pp. 512 ff. Crossref logo
Toolan, Michael
2018.  In A Companion to Literary Theory,  pp. 60 ff. Crossref logo
Voskresenskaya, N. A. & O. O. Gulik
2021. Prospects for Survival of Covid Neologisms in Modern English. Nauchnyi dialog :11  pp. 50 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Hong
2021. “What do you know about semantic prosody?” Teaching and evaluating implicit knowledge of English with corpus-assisted methods. English in Education 55:4  pp. 337 ff. Crossref logo
Čermáková, Anna & Michaela Mahlberg
2018.  In The Corpus Linguistics Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 87],  pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata

Literature & Literary Studies

Theoretical literature & literary studies
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2015043433 | Marc record