Chapter 10. Effects of creative writing on adolescent students’ literary response
This chapter examines whether creative writing prior to reading influences students’ reading process and appreciation of short stories. Participants were 53 fifteen year old students, assigned to two conditions. In the writing condition students composed their own stories, and then read the authors᾽ stories while thinking aloud. In the non-writing condition they responded to the stories without writing. Think aloud responses were analyzed for the (meta)cognitive and affective reading activities students displayed. Story appreciation was measured by a questionnaire. Results indicate that the creative writing group showed more emotional engagement during reading than the non-writing group. Moreover, the creative writing group appreciated the stories more after reading than did the non-writing group. This suggests that writing as a pre-reading activity may positively influence students’ reading engagement.
References
Ainley, M., Hillman, K., & Hidi, S
(
2002)
Gender and interest processes in response to literary texts; Situational and individual interest.
Learning and Instruction, 12, 411-428.
Andringa, E
(
1995)
Strategieën bij het lezen van literatuur. [Strategies in literary reading].
Spiegel, 13(3), 7-33.
Austen, V.J
(
2005)
The value of creative writing assignments in English literature courses.
International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 2(2), 138-150.
Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Huley, M.M., & Wilkinson, B
(
2004)
The effects of school-based writing to learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis.
Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29-58.
Boscolo, P. & Carotti, L
(
2003)
Does writing contribute to improving high school students’ approach to literature? L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature 3(3): 197-224.
Broekkamp, H., Janssen, T., & van den Bergh, H
(
2009)
Is there a relationship between literature reading and creative writing? Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(4), 281-297.
Cohen, J
(
1988)
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Denner, P.R., McGinley, W.J., & Brown, E
(
1989)
Effects of story impressions as a prereading/writing activity on story comprehension.
Journal of Educational Research, 82(6), 320-326.
Denner, P.R., & McGinley, W.J
(
1992)
Effects of prereading activities on junior high students’ recall.
Journal of Educational Research, 86(1), 11-19.
Denner, P.R., Rickards, J.P., & Albanese, A.J
(
2003)
The effect of story impressions preview on learning from narrative text.
The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(4), 313-332.
Disney, D
(
2014)
Introduction. In
D. Disney (Ed.),
Exploring second language creative writing: Beyond Babel (pp. 1-10). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Elbow, P
(
2002)
The cultures of literature and composition: What could each learn from the other? College English, 64(5), 533-546.
Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A
(
1993)
Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Glenn, W.J
(
2007)
Real writers as aware readers: Writing creatively as a means to develop reading skills.
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(1), 10-20.
Groeben, N
(
2001)
Literary creativity. In
D. Schram &
G. Steen (Eds.),
The Psychology and sociology of literature: In honor of Elrud Ibsch (pp.17-34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hebert, M., Gillespie, A., & Graham, S
(
2013)
Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension.
Reading and Writing, 26, 111-138.
Janssen, T., & Rijlaarsdam, G
(
1996)
Approaches to the teaching of literature: A national survey of literary education in Dutch secondary schools. In
R.J. Kreuz &
M.S. MacNealy (Eds.),
Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 513-536). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., & Rijlaarsdam, G
(
2006)
Literary reading activities of good and weak students: A think aloud study.
European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(1), 35-52.
Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H
Kelley, M.J., & Decker, E.O
(
2009)
The current state of motivation to read among middle school students.
Reading Psychology, 30(5), 466-485.
Kieft, M
(
2004)
Creatief schrijven en literatuur lezen. [
Creative writing and literature reading]. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam, Instituut voor de Lerarenopleiding.
Kieft, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H
(
2006)
Writing as a learning tool: Testing the role of students’ writing strategies.
European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(1), 17–34.
Klein, P.D
(
1999)
Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn.
Educational Psychology Review, 11, 203-270.
Knoeller, C
(
2003)
Imaginative response: Teaching literature through creative writing.
English Journal, 92(5), 42-48.
Kucan, L
(
2007)
“I” poems: Invitations for students to deepen literary understanding.
The Reading Teacher, 60(6), 518-525.
Lancia, P.J
(
1997)
Literary borrowing: The effects of literature on children’s writing.
The Reading Teacher, 50(6), 470-475.
Levi, P
(
1987)
Het interview. In
Alle verhalen. [
The interview. In Collected stories] (pp. 677-678). Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.
Marino, J.L., Gould, S.M., & Haas, L.W
(
1985)
The effects of writing as a prereading activity on delayed recall of narrative text.
The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 199-206.
Marshall, J
(
1987)
The effects of writing on students’ understanding of literary texts.
Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 30–63.
Morrow, L.M., & Gambrell, L
(
2000)
Literature-based reading instruction. In
M. Kamil,
P. Mosenthal,
D. Pearson &
R. Barr (Eds.),
Handbook of reading research (pp. 563-586). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nationale Jeugdraad
(
2008)
Jongeren schrijven: Creatief schrijven tussen 12 en 18 jaar. [
Young people write; Creative writing in the age group of 12 to 18 years]. Retrieved on 6 May, 2011 from:
[URL]
Newell, G.E., Suszynski, K., & Weingart, R
(
1989)
The effects of writing in a reader-based and text-based mode on students’ understanding of two short stories.
Journal of Reading Behaviour, 21, 37-57.
Newell, G.E
(
1996)
Reader-based and teacher-centered instructional tasks: Writing and learning about as short literary story in middle-track classrooms.
Journal of Literacy Research, 28(1), 147-172.
Newell, G.E
(
2006)
Writing to learn: How alternative theories of school writing account for student performance. In
C.A. MacArthur,
S., Graham, &
J. Fitzgerald (Eds.),
Handbook of writing research (pp. 235-247). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Pope, R
(
1995)
Textual intervention: Critical and creative strategies for literary studies. London: Routledge.
van Schooten, E.J
(
2005)
Literary response and attitude toward reading fiction. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Groningen.
White, B.F
(
1995)
Effects of autobiographical writing before reading on students’ responses to short stories.
The Journal of Educational Research, 88(3), 173-185.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T
(
2000)
Engagement and motivation in reading. In
M.L. Kamil,
P.B. Mosenthal,
P.D. Pearson, &
R. Barr (Eds.),
Handbook of reading research (Vol. III; pp. 403-422). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Winterson, J
(
1998)
The three friends. In
The world and other places (pp. 47-51). New York: Vintage International.
Witte, T
(
2008)
Het oog van de meester; Een onderzoek naar de literaire ontwikkeling van havo- en vwo-leerlingen in de tweede fase van het voortgezet onderwijs [
The eye of the master; A study of students’ literary development in upper secondary education]. Delft: Eburon.
Wong, B.Y.L., Kuperis, S., Jamieson D., Keller, L., & Cull-Hewitt, R
(
2002)
Effects of guided journal writing on students’ story understanding.
Journal of Educational Research, 95(3), 179-191.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Lugea, Jane
2017.
The year’s work in stylistics 2016.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4
► pp. 340 ff.
Schrijvers, Marloes, Tanja Janssen, Olivia Fialho & Gert Rijlaarsdam
2019.
Gaining Insight Into Human Nature: A Review of Literature Classroom Intervention Studies.
Review of Educational Research 89:1
► pp. 3 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.