Article published in:
Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments
Edited by Michael Burke, Olivia Fialho and Sonia Zyngier
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 24] 2016
► pp. 253270
Ager, D.E
(2003) Ideology and image: Britain and language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., Leech, G. & Johansson, S
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V
(2004) If you look at. . .: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
British Library
(2014) Teaching resources, Dickens’s Oliver Twist: Depictions of childhood. Accessed January 2015 from: http://​www​.bl​.uk​/teaching​-resources​/dickenss​-oliver​-twist​-depictions​-of​-childhoodGoogle Scholar
Carter, R
(1990) Knowledge about language and the curriculum: The LINC reader. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
(2004) Language and creativity: The art of common talk. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., & Nash, W
(1990) Seeing through language: A guide to styles of English writing. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cheng, W
(2012) Exploring corpus linguistics: Language in action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dymoke, S
(2009) Teaching English texts 11-18. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J
(2014) Wordle. Accessed March 2015 from: http://​www​.wordle​.net/Google Scholar
Fleming, M. & Stevens, D
(2009) English teaching in the secondary school: Linking theory and practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L
(2012) Corpora and language education. Houndmills: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, M
(1981) Dickens and the suspended quotation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Louw, W.E
(1993) Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair (pp. 157-174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, M
(2005) English general nouns: A corpus theoretical approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) A corpus stylistic perspective on Dickens's Great Expectations . In M. Lambrou & P. Stockwell (Eds.), Contemporary stylistics (pp. 19-31). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2012) The corpus stylistic analysis of fiction or the fiction of corpus stylistics? In M. Huber & J. Mukherjee (Eds.), Corpus linguistics and variation in English: Theory and description (pp. 77-95). Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Corpus stylistics and Dickens’s fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2014) Corpus stylistics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 378-392). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M., & Smith, C
(2012) Dickens, the suspended quotation and the corpus. Language and Literature, 21(1), 51-65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & A. Hardie
(2012) Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poulson, L
(1998) English curriculum in schools. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Reed, J.R
(2005) The gentleman in the white waistcoat: Dickens and metonymy. Style, 39(4), 412-426.Google Scholar
Ricento, T
(Ed.) (2000) Ideology, politics, and language policies. Focus on English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Russell Group
(2013) Informed Choices (rev. ed.). Accessed March 2015 from: http://​russellgroup​.org​/InformedChoices​-latest​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ryan M.-L
(1992) Possible worlds, artificial intelligence, and narrative theory. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., & Unsworth, J
(Eds.) (2004) A companion to digital humanities. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Searle J.R
(1975) The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History, 6(2), 319-332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sklar, H
(2013) The art of sympathy in fiction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J
(2004) Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stevenson, D
(1997) Information and communications technology in UK schools: An independent inquiry (The independent ICT in Schools commission report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P
(2002) Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2009) Texture: A cognitive aesthetics of reading. Edinburgh: EdinburghUniversity Press.Google Scholar
(2015) Disciplining English language studies. In A. Hewings (Ed.), Futures for English studies. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P., & Mahlberg, M
(2015) Mind-modelling with corpus stylistics in David Copperfield , Language and Literature, 24(2), 129-147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Cushing, Ian
2018. Stylistics goes to school. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:4  pp. 271 ff. Crossref logo
Egbert, Jesse & Michaela Mahlberg
2020. Fiction – one register or two?. Register Studies 2:1  pp. 72 ff. Crossref logo
Lugea, Jane
2017. The year’s work in stylistics 2016. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4  pp. 340 ff. Crossref logo
Mahlberg, Michaela, Peter Stockwell, Johan de Joode, Catherine Smith & Matthew Brook O'Donnell
2016. CLiC Dickens: novel uses of concordances for the integration of corpus stylistics and cognitive poetics. Corpora 11:3  pp. 433 ff. Crossref logo
Mahlberg, Michaela, Viola Wiegand, Peter Stockwell & Anthony Hennessey
2019. Speech-bundles in the 19th-century English novel. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4  pp. 326 ff. Crossref logo
Čermáková, Anna & Michaela Mahlberg
2018.  In The Corpus Linguistics Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 87],  pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.