Cover not available
Part of
Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments
Edited by Michael Burke, Olivia Fialho and Sonia Zyngier
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 24] 2016
► pp. 253–270

Chapter 13. Point and CLiC

Teaching literature with corpus stylistic tools

ORCID logo | University of Birmingham
ORCID logo | University of Nottingham
This chapter looks at the corpus tool CLiC, a web application specifically designed for the study of literary texts. It allows students to run concordances or generate keywords, for instance. It gives students the opportunity to work with a corpus of Dickens novels, but also with novels by other nineteenth century authors. Unlike more general corpus tools, CLiC enables searches that help to address research questions particular to literary texts. We investigate the question as to what kind of corpus exercises can be designed to help students understand the variety of opportunities that corpus approaches to literary texts offer. We deal with issues of frequency, but also with links between concepts in literary linguistics and corpus linguistics, specifically characterization and mind-modelling. We focus on examples from Charles Dickens’s Oliver Twist for an illustrative case-study.
Keywords: characterization, clusters, concordances, corpus stylistics, corpus tools, mind-modelling, suspensions
Published online: 22 July 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.24.13mah
References (37)
References
Ager, D.E. (2003). Ideology and image: Britain and language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., Leech, G. & Johansson, S. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at. . .: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BNCweb. Accessed March 2015 from: <[URL]>
British Library (2014). Teaching resources, Dickens’s Oliver Twist: Depictions of childhood. Accessed January 2015 from: <[URL]>Google Scholar
Carter, R. (1990). Knowledge about language and the curriculum: The LINC reader. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
. (2004). Language and creativity: The art of common talk. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., & Nash, W. (1990). Seeing through language: A guide to styles of English writing. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cheng, W. (2012). Exploring corpus linguistics: Language in action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Department for Education (2013). National Curriculum in England: Computing programmes of study. London: HMSO. Accessed March 2015 from: <[URL]>Google Scholar
Dymoke, S. (2009). Teaching English texts 11-18. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. (2014). Wordle. Accessed March 2015 from: <[URL]>Google Scholar
Fleming, M. & Stevens, D. (2009). English teaching in the secondary school: Linking theory and practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L. (2012). Corpora and language education. Houndmills: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, M. (1981). Dickens and the suspended quotation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Louw, W.E. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair (pp. 157-174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, M. (2005). English general nouns: A corpus theoretical approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). A corpus stylistic perspective on Dickens's Great Expectations . In M. Lambrou & P. Stockwell (Eds.), Contemporary stylistics (pp. 19-31). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. (2012). The corpus stylistic analysis of fiction or the fiction of corpus stylistics? In M. Huber & J. Mukherjee (Eds.), Corpus linguistics and variation in English: Theory and description (pp. 77-95). Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). Corpus stylistics and Dickens’s fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. (2014). Corpus stylistics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 378-392). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M., & Smith, C. (2012). Dickens, the suspended quotation and the corpus. Language and Literature, 21(1), 51-65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & A. Hardie (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poulson, L. (1998). English curriculum in schools. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Reed, J.R. (2005). The gentleman in the white waistcoat: Dickens and metonymy. Style, 39(4), 412-426.Google Scholar
Ricento, T. (Ed.), (2000). Ideology, politics, and language policies. Focus on English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell Group (2013). Informed Choices (rev. ed.). Accessed March 2015 from: <[URL]>Google Scholar
Ryan M.-L. (1992). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence, and narrative theory. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., & Unsworth, J. (Eds.). (2004). A companion to digital humanities. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Searle J.R. (1975). The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History, 6(2), 319-332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sklar, H. (2013). The art of sympathy in fiction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stevenson, D. (1997). Information and communications technology in UK schools: An independent inquiry (The independent ICT in Schools commission report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. (2009). Texture: A cognitive aesthetics of reading. Edinburgh: EdinburghUniversity Press.Google Scholar
. (2015). Disciplining English language studies. In A. Hewings (Ed.), Futures for English studies. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P., & Mahlberg, M. (2015). Mind-modelling with corpus stylistics in David Copperfield , Language and Literature, 24(2), 129-147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Egbert, Jesse & Michaela Mahlberg
2020. Fiction – one register or two?. Register Studies 2:1 ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Mahlberg, Michaela, Viola Wiegand, Peter Stockwell & Anthony Hennessey
2019. Speech-bundles in the 19th-century English novel. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4 ► pp. 326 ff. DOI logo
Cushing, Ian
2018. Stylistics goes to school. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:4 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Čermáková, Anna & Michaela Mahlberg
2018. Translating fictional characters – Alice and the Queen from the Wonderland in English and Czech. In The Corpus Linguistics Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 87], ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Lugea, Jane
2017. The year’s work in stylistics 2016. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4 ► pp. 340 ff. DOI logo
Mahlberg, Michaela, Peter Stockwell, Johan de Joode, Catherine Smith & Matthew Brook O'Donnell
2016. CLiC Dickens: novel uses of concordances for the integration of corpus stylistics and cognitive poetics. Corpora 11:3 ► pp. 433 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.