Chapter 5. Decoding the parentheses in Shakespeare’s Coriolanus
A functionalist approach
Guohua Chen | National Research Centre for Foreign Language Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University
Suping Duan | School of Foreign Languages,
North China Electric Power University
Though it has been pointed out that Shakespeare uses the figure parenthesis
“extensively, especially in his later plays” (Joseph 1947: 57), it has
been more often marginalized, if not totally neglected. The present paper
contends that parenthesis contributes greatly to characterization and the
development of conflicts in dramatic texts. Through a detailed analysis
of its use in Shakespeare’s Coriolanus, this paper attempts to illustrate the significance of
parenthesis. At the rhetorical level, parenthesis may have the dual functions of
varying and amplifying as differentiated by Adamson (1999). For example, a
parenthesis may take the form of a noun phrase in apposition to its antecedent
as a way of varying and it may take the form of a non-restrictive relative clause
as a way of amplifying, and therefore helps achieve diverse rhetorical effects
and convey rich rhetorical meanings. For this reason, a functional study of the
subjective and interpersonal function of parentheses can provide clues to a deeper understanding
of speaker-hearer relationship, hence of overall dramatic characterization
and conflict management.
References (26)
References
Adamson, S. 1999. Literary language. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 3, 1476–1776, R. Lass (ed.), 539–653. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burton-Roberts, N. 2006. Parentheticals. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, Vol. VIII, K. Brown (ed.), 179–182. Amsterdam: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dobson, M. & Wells, S. (eds.). 2001. The Oxford Companion to Shakespeare. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Downing, A. & Locke, P. 2006. English Grammar: A University Course, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, G. Blakemore & Tobin, J.J.M. (eds). 1974/1997. The Riverside Shakespeare, 2nd edn. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Finegan, E. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation in language: An introduction. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, D. Stein & S. Wright (eds.), 1–15. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graham-White, A. 1995. Punctuation and Its Dramatic Value in Shakespearean Drama. Newark DE: University of Delaware Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenblatt, S., Cohen, W., Howard, J.E. & Maus, K.E. 1997. The Norton Shakespeare. New York NY: Norton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hinman, C. (ed.). 1968[1996]. The Norton Facsimile: The First Folio of Shakespeare, 2nd edn. New York NY: Norton![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Joseph, Sister M. 1947. Shakespeare’s Use of the Arts of Language. New York NY: Columbia University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lamb, J.P. 2010. Parentheses and privacy in Philip Sidney’s Arcadia. Studies in Philology 107(3): 310–335. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lennard, J. 1991. But I Digress: The Exploitation of Parentheses in English Printed Verse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mack, P. 2002. Elizabethan Rhetoric: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mulcaster, J. 1582. The Elementarie. Accessed through Early English Books Online (EEBO).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parkes, M.B. 1992. Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. Menston: Scolar Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peacham, H. 1577[1971]. The Garden of Eloquence. Menston: Scolar Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Puttenham, G. 1589[1936/1969]. The Arte of English Poesie, G. Doidge Willcock & A. Walker (eds). Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shakespeare, W. 2000/2010. Coriolanus (The New Cambridge Shakespeare, updated edn), L. Bliss (ed.). Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shakespeare, W. 1964. Coriolanus [The New Shakespeare], J.D. Wilson (ed.). Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shakespeare, W. 1998. The Tragedy of Coriolanus [Oxford World’s Classics], R.B. Parker (ed.). Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shakespeare, W. 1976. The Tragedy of Coriolanus [The Arden Shakespeare], P. Brockbank (ed.). London: Methuen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E.C. & Dasher, R.B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vickers, B. 1988. In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, R.G. 1993. Reading the parenthesis. SubStance 22(1): 53–66. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Lugea, Jane
2017.
The year’s work in stylistics 2016.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4
► pp. 340 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.