Chapter 5. Decoding the parentheses in Shakespeare’s Coriolanus
A functionalist approach
Guohua Chen | National Research Centre for Foreign Language Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University
Suping Duan | School of Foreign Languages,
North China Electric Power University
Though it has been pointed out that Shakespeare uses the figure parenthesis
“extensively, especially in his later plays” (Joseph 1947: 57), it has
been more often marginalized, if not totally neglected. The present paper
contends that parenthesis contributes greatly to characterization and the
development of conflicts in dramatic texts. Through a detailed analysis
of its use in Shakespeare’s Coriolanus, this paper attempts to illustrate the significance of
parenthesis. At the rhetorical level, parenthesis may have the dual functions of
varying and amplifying as differentiated by Adamson (1999). For example, a
parenthesis may take the form of a noun phrase in apposition to its antecedent
as a way of varying and it may take the form of a non-restrictive relative clause
as a way of amplifying, and therefore helps achieve diverse rhetorical effects
and convey rich rhetorical meanings. For this reason, a functional study of the
subjective and interpersonal function of parentheses can provide clues to a deeper understanding
of speaker-hearer relationship, hence of overall dramatic characterization
and conflict management.
References
Adamson, S
1999 Literary language. In
The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 3, 1476–1776,
R. Lass (ed.), 539–653. Cambridge: CUP.
Burton-Roberts, N
2006 Parentheticals. In
Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, Vol. VIII,
K. Brown (ed.), 179–182. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Dobson, M. & Wells, S
(eds.) 2001 The Oxford Companion to Shakespeare. Oxford: OUP.
Downing, A. & Locke, P
2006 English Grammar: A University Course, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Evans, G. Blakemore & Tobin, J.J.M
(eds) 1974/1997 The Riverside Shakespeare, 2nd edn. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Finegan, E
1995 Subjectivity and subjectivisation in language: An introduction. In
Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives,
D. Stein &
S. Wright (eds.), 1–15. Cambridge: CUP.
Graham-White, A
1995 Punctuation and Its Dramatic Value in Shakespearean Drama. Newark DE: University of Delaware Press.
Greenblatt, S., Cohen, W., Howard, J.E. & Maus, K.E
1997 The Norton Shakespeare. New York NY: Norton.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C
2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Hinman, C
(ed.) 1968[1996] The Norton Facsimile: The First Folio of Shakespeare, 2nd edn. New York NY: Norton
Joseph, Sister M
1947 Shakespeare’s Use of the Arts of Language. New York NY: Columbia University Press.
Lamb, J.P
2010 Parentheses and privacy in Philip Sidney’s Arcadia.
Studies in Philology 107(3): 310–335.
Lennard, J
1991 But I Digress: The Exploitation of Parentheses in English Printed Verse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mack, P
2002 Elizabethan Rhetoric: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP.
Mulcaster, J
1582 The Elementarie. Accessed through Early English Books Online (EEBO).
Parkes, M.B
1992 Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. Menston: Scolar Press.
Peacham, H
1577[1971] The Garden of Eloquence. Menston: Scolar Press.
Puttenham, G
1589[1936/1969] The Arte of English Poesie,
G. Doidge Willcock &
A. Walker (eds). Cambridge: CUP.
Shakespeare, W
2000/2010 Coriolanus (The New Cambridge Shakespeare, updated edn),
L. Bliss (ed.). Cambridge: CUP.
Shakespeare, W
1964 Coriolanus [The New Shakespeare],
J.D. Wilson (ed.). Cambridge: CUP.
Shakespeare, W
1998 The Tragedy of Coriolanus [Oxford World’s Classics],
R.B. Parker (ed.). Oxford: OUP.
Shakespeare, W
1976 The Tragedy of Coriolanus [The Arden Shakespeare],
P. Brockbank (ed.). London: Methuen.
Traugott, E.C. & Dasher, R.B
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.
Vickers, B
1988 In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Williams, R.G
1993 Reading the parenthesis.
SubStance 22(1): 53–66.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Lugea, Jane
2017.
The year’s work in stylistics 2016.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4
► pp. 340 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.