Chapter published in:Narrative Absorption
Edited by Frank Hakemulder, Moniek M. Kuijpers, Ed S. Tan, Katalin Bálint and Miruna M. Doicaru
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 27] 2017
► pp. 177–197
Chapter 9The effect of suspense structure on felt suspense and narrative absorption in literature and film
The present study was to further the understanding of the conceptual relationship between narrative absorption, that is the intense engagement with a story world, and felt suspense, that is the anticipation of a narrative outcome event. To this end, a media comparative online experiment was conducted with a 2 (Media format: film vs. literature) × 2 (Suspense structure: diegetic vs. non-diegetic delay) × 2 (Stories) between subject design. Results revealed a complex relationship among felt suspense, attention, emotional engagement, and transportation, showing the high importance of attention in felt suspense, and the moderating effect of media format and gender. Findings indicate that non-diegetic suspense delay unlike diegetic suspense decreases felt suspense and narrative absorption independently of media format.
- 1.1Narrative suspense structures
- 1.2Felt suspense and narrative absorption
- 2.1Design and procedure
- 2.3Stimulus material
- Suspense Scale
- Story world Absorption Scale
- Aesthetic Appreciation
- Attention check
- 4.1Relation between suspense and absorption
- 4.2The effect of suspense structure on felt suspense and narrative absorption
- 4.3The effect of media format on felt suspense and narrative absorption
- 4.4Limitations and recommendations
- 4.5Suggestions for further research
Published online: 09 November 2017
Appel, M., Gnambs, T., Richter, T., & Green, M. C.
Armbrust, T. Producer & Reeves, M.
Bálint, K., & Tan, E. S.
Bezdek, M. A.
Bezdek, M. A., & Gerrig, R. J.
Bezdek, M., Gerrig, R., Wenzel, W., Shin, J., Revill, K. P., Schumacher, E.
Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H.
Brewer, W. F., & Ohtsuka, K.
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H.
Butan, M. Producer & Hillcoat, J.
Chatman, S. B.
Comisky, P., & Bryant, J.
Doicaru, M. M.
Geiger, S., & Reeves, B.
Gerrig, R. J., & Bernardo, A. B.
Graaf, A. de, & Hustinx, L.
(2011) The effect of story structure on emotion, transportation, and persuasion. Information Design Journal, 19, 142–154. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/2066/94729
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F.
Green, M. C., Kass, S., Carrey, J., Herzig, B., Feeney, R., & Sabini, J.
Hoeken, H., & Van Vliet, M.
(2000) Suspense, curiosity, and surprise: How discourse structure influences the affective and cognitive processing of a story. Poetics, 27(4), 277–286. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/2066/82888
Kinnebrock, S. & Bilandzic, H.
(2006 June). How to make a story work: Introducing the concept of narrativity into narrative persuasion. Paper presented at the 56th yearly International Communication Association Conference , Dresden, Germany. Retrieved from http://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/50885/files/3638.pdf
Knobloch, S., Patzig, G., Mende, A. M., & Hastall, M.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Keplinger, C.
Kron, A., Schul, Y., Cohen, A., Hassin, R. R.
Kuijpers, M. M.
Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Doicaru, M. M., Tan, E. S.
Lang, A., Geiger, S., Strickwerda, M., & Sumner, J.
Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A.
Oliver, M. B., Sargent, S. L., & James III, B.
Pramaggiore, M., & Wallis, T.
Raz, G., Jacob, Y., Gonen, T., Winetraub, Y., Flash, T., Soreq, E., & Hendler, T.
Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J.
Tan, E. S., & Diteweg, G.
Zillman, D., & Cantor, J. R.
Wied, M. de
Cited by 5 other publications
Hiskes, Ben, Milo Hicks, Samuel Evola, Cameron Kincaid & Fritz Breithaupt
Klenner, Niels & Tilmann Köppe
Kuijpers, Moniek M.
Pianzola, Federico, Katalin Bálint & Jessica Weller
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.