Cover not available
Part of
The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter
Edited by Manuel Jobert and Sandrine Sorlin
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 30] 2018
► pp. 1–30

Chapter 9
Irony as counter positioning

Reader comments on the EU migrant crisis

| Masaryk University, Brno

This chapter examines how ironic utterances in forums are used for the purpose of collective positioning of the commenting readers in opposition to other groups. Approaching irony as an act of , the analysis focuses on how readers echo both the representations made by the media texts and the beliefs and ideologies presumed to be held by other social actors. It is argued that through irony, readers express their oppositional attitudes, disaffiliating themselves from the ironized social actors and their real or assumed representations. Simultaneously, ironists enforce their own opinions and standpoints, which are not just personal but – as argued in the paper – representative of a larger group to which the commenter belongs. By tracing how irony is used in reader comments to delegitimize dissonant views and emphasize contrastive , this paper seeks to extend the application of an interactional pragmatic approach to irony by adding a critical discourse analytical dimension to it.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Online comments and discussion forums
  • 3.Data and analysis
    • 3.1Irony and
      • 3.1.1 of primary media texts
      • 3.1.2 of non-media texts and
    • 3.2Irony and categorization
      • 3.2.1Self-categorization
      • 3.2.2Other-categorization
      • 3.2.3Polarized categorization and
    • 3.3Irony and
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
Published online: 25 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.30.09cho
References

Sources

Už i Rakousko staví plot. Chce usměrnit proud běženců ze Slovinska
. [Even Austria is building a fence. It wants to channel the flow of migrants from Slovenia]. idnes.cz 13 November 2015 <[URL] Google Scholar
Rakušané v Alpách postaví 370 metrů dlouhý plot, Itálii se to nelíbí
. [Austrians to build a 370-metre fence in the Alps, Italy does not like it]. idnes.cz 27 April 2016 <[URL] Google Scholar
Prevence proti uprchlíkům. Rakousko chystá plot na hranicích s Maďarskem
. [Prevention against refugees. Austria prepares a fence on borders with Hungary]. idnes.cz 20 September 2016 <[URL] Google Scholar
Alba-Juez, Laura & Attardo, Salvatore
2014 The evaluative palette of verbal irony. In Evaluation in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 242], Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds), 93–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
2000 Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics 32(6): 793–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Irony. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Keith Eward Brown (ed.). Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, Michael Holquist (ed.). Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Burgers, Christian, van Mulken, Margot & Schellens, Peter Jan
2011 Finding irony: An introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol 26(3): 186–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr
2008 Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 17–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 232]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chovanec, Jan
2010 Legitimation through differentiation: Discursive construction of Jacques Le Worm Chirac as an opponent to military action. In Perspectives in Politics and Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 36], Urszula Okulska & Piotr Cap (eds), 61–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012a Conversational humour and joint fantasizing in online journalism. In Language and Humour in the Media, Jan Chovanec & Isabel Ermida (eds), 139–161. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2012b Implicit meaning and racism in political advertising. In Discourse Interpretation: Approaches and Applications, Olga Dontcheva-Navratilova & Renata Povolná (eds), 55–77. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2017a Participating with media. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Media, Colleen Cotter & Daniel Perrin (eds), 505–522. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2017b The othering of Roma migrants in British and Czech online news discussion forums. In Representing the Other in European Media Discourses [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 74], Jan Chovanec & Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska (eds), 235–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chovanec, Jan & Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna
(eds) 2017 Representing the Other in European Media Discourses [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 74]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
1999 Irony in conversation. Language in Society 28: 528–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2014 Isn’t it ironic? Defining the scope of humorous irony. Humor 27(4): 619–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 The irony of irony: Irony based on truthfulness. Corpus Pragmatics 1(1): 3–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
El Refaie, Elisabeth
2001 Metaphors we discriminate by: Naturalized themes in Austrian newspaper articles about asylum seekers. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(3): 352–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 ‘Our purebred ethnic compatriots’: Irony in newspaper journalism. Journal of Pragmatics 37(6): 781–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ensink, Titus
2012 Internet newspaper discussion lists. A virtual political arena? In Dialogue in Politics [Dialogue Studies 18], Lawrence N. Berlin & Anita Fetzer (eds), 21–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989 Language and Power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Goodman, Simon & Rowe, Lottie
2014 ‘Maybe it is prejudice… but it is NOT racism’: Negotiating racism in discussion forums about Gypsies. Discourse & Society 25(1): 32–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardaker, Claire
2010 Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research 6: 215–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harré, Rom & Van Langenhove, Luk
1999 Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher
2010 Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science. New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartley, John
1982 Understanding News. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael & Chang, Wei-Lin Melody
2015 Troubles talk, (dis)affiliation and the participation order in Taiwanese-Chinese online discussion boards. In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 256], Marta Dynel & Jan Chovanec (eds), 99–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopkinson, Christopher
2013 Trolling in online discussions: From provocation to community-building. Brno Studies in English 39(1): 5–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Marjut
2015 Bravo for this editorial! Users’ comments in discussion forums. In Follow-ups in Political Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 60], Elda Weizman & Anita Fetzer (eds), 83–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapogianni, Eleni
2011 Irony via “surrealism”. In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 210], Marta Dynel (ed.), 51–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 The ironist’s intentions. Pragmatics & Cognition 23(1): 150–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
1999 Coherent keying in conversational humor: Contextualizing joint fictionalization. In Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. How to Create It and How to Describe It [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 63], Wolfram Bublitz, Uta Lenk & Ejia Ventola (eds), 125–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35(9): 1387–1411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laineste, Liisi
2013 Funny or aggressive? Failed humour in internet comments. Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore 53: 29–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Othering in Estonian online discussions about refugees. In Representing the Other in European Media Discourses [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 74], Jan Chovanec & Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska (eds), 281–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livnat, Zohar & Dori-Haconen, Gonen
2013 The effect of irony in radio talk-back programmes in Israel. In Fetzer (ed.), 193–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, Fathali & Harré, Rom
2010 Words, conflicts and political processes. In Words of Conflict, Words of War: How the Language We Use in Political Processes Sparks Fighting, Fathali Moghaddam & Rom Harré (eds), 1–27. Santa Barbara CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna & Chovanec, Jan
2017 Media representations of the ‘other’ Europeans: Common themes and points of divergence. In Representing the Other in European Media Discourses [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 74], Jan Chovanec & Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska (eds), 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2010 Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust: The Concept of the Body Politic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan
2006 The Linguistics of Laughter. A corpus-assisted study of laughter-talk. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2007 Irony and reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics 39(3): 1547–1569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin & Wodak, Ruth
2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-semitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto
1999 ‘Like an animal I was treated’: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & Society 10(2): 191–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shilikhina, Ksenia
2018 Discourse markers as guides to understanding spontaneous humor and irony. InThe Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Encounters [Topics in Humor Research 7], Villy Tsakona & Jan Chovanec (eds), 57–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stallone, Letícia & Haugh, Michael
2016 Joint fantasising as relational practice in Brazilian Portuguese interactions. Language & Communication 55: 10–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsakona, Villy
2011 Irony beyond criticism: Evidence from Greek parliamentary discourse. Pragmatics & Society 2(1): 57–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Online joint fictionalization. In The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Encounters [Topics in Humor Research 7], Villy Tsakona & Jan Chovanec (eds), 229–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsakona, Villy & Chovanec, Jan
2018 The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Encounters [Topics in Humor Research 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun
1998 Opinions and ideologies in the press. In Approaches to Media Discourse, Allan Bell & Peter Garrett (eds), 21–63. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
2007 Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse and Communication 1: 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda
2008 Positioning in Media Dialogue: Negotiating Roles in the News Interview. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Political irony: Constructing reciprocal positioning in the news interview. In Fetzer (ed.), 167–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Irony in and through follow-ups: Talk and meta-talk in online commenting in the Israeli context. In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-ups [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 259], Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman & Lawrence N. Berlin (eds), 173–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2006 The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua 116(10): 1722–1743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wirth-Koliba, Victoria
2016 The diverse and dynamic world of ‘us’ and ‘them’ in political discourse. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 8(1): 23–37.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2001 The discourse-historical approach. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds), 63–94. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Suppression of the Nazi past, coded languages, and discourses of silence: Applying the discourse-historical approach to post-war anti-semitism in Austria. In Political Languages in the Age of Extremes, Willibald Steinmetz (ed.), 351–379. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2015 The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, de Cillia, Rudolf, Reisigl, Martin & Liebhart, Karin
1999 The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Baider, Fabienne & Maria Constantinou
2020. Covert hate speech. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2 ► pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Chovanec, Jan
2019. Multimodal storytelling in the news: Sequenced images as ideological scripts of othering. Discourse, Context & Media 28 ► pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
Heuman, Anna
2021. Acceptable Language Online: Negotiating the Impact of Digital Affordances. In Analyzing Digital Discourses, ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna & Jan Chovanec
2017. Media representations of the “other” Europeans. In Representing the Other in European Media Discourses [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 74], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019. The year’s work in stylistics 2018. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4 ► pp. 354 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.