Cover not available
Part of
Experiencing Fictional Worlds
Edited by Benedict Neurohr and Lizzie Stewart-Shaw
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 32] 2019
► pp. 15–32

Chapter 2
Immersion and emergence in children’s literature

Immersion – the sense of attentional involvement and displacement in a fictional world – has been established as an experiential phenomenon in psychology and psycholinguistics, but little focus has been given to the understanding of the nature of the experience itself, especially in relation to literary texts. Most work on immersion as “cognitive flow” has been produced in relation to multimedia settings such as videogames. This chapter draws on naturalistic, non-experimental reader responses to explore the cognitive poetics of literary immersion. In particular, immersion is addressed as an aspect of the developmental literacy of readers, with reference to the different ways that child-readers and adult-readers cast their minds towards fictional characters and emerge emotionally from fictional worlds.
Keywords: immersion, emergence, emotion, literacy, The Railway Children , mind-casting, deixis, text-worlds
Article outline
  • 2.1Immersion and its correlates
  • 2.2The developmental literacy of immersion
  • 2.3Mind-casting and emergence
  • 2.4Immersion, emergence, emotion, resonance
  • References
Published online: 21 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.32.02sto
References (65)
References
Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. 2000. Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly 24(4): 665–694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V. and Stair, R. 1997. Cognitive absorption and the adoption of new information technologies. In Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, L. Dosier and J. Keys (eds), 293–297. Statesboro: Office of Publication and Faculty Research Services in the College of Business Administration at Georgia Southern University.Google Scholar
Arizpe, E. and Smith, V.(eds). 2015. Children as Readers in Children’s Literature: The Power of Texts and the Importance of Reading. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Artaud, A. 1971. Collected Works of Antonin Artaud (trans. V. Corti). London: Calder and Boyars.Google Scholar
Bacon, H. 2009. Aesthetics and the experience of re-experience. In Narration and Spectatorship in Moving Images, J. D. Anderson and B. Fisher (eds), 260–276. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Bell, A. and Ensslin, A. 2011. “I know what it was. You know what it was”: second-person narration in hypertext fiction. Narrative 19(3): 311–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouko, C. 2014. Interactivity and immersion in a media-based performance. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies 11(1): 254–269.Google Scholar
Burwick, F. and Pape, W.(eds). 1990. Aesthetic Illusion: Theoretical and Historical Approaches. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, J. 2007. Flow in games (and everything else). Communications of the ACM 50(4): 31–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. 1817. Biographia Literaria. Rest Fenner: London.Google Scholar
Cook, G. 1994. Discourse and Literature: The Interplay of Form and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cowley, B., Charles, D., Black, M. and Hickey, R. 2008. Toward an understanding of flow in video games. Computers in Entertainment 6(2) (July). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
1996. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
2014. Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (Volume 2). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Beaugrande, R. 1987. Schemas for literary communication. In Discourse: Aspects of Cognitive and Social Psychological Approaches, L. Hàlàsz (ed.), 49–99. Literary Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dove, T. 1994. Theater without actors – immersion and response in installation. Leonardo 27(4): 281–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyson, F. 2009. Sounding New Media. Immersion and Embodiment in the Arts and Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gavins, J. 2007. Text World Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1983. Narrative Discourse. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. 1993. Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. and Rapp, D. 2004. Psychological processes underlying literary impact. Poetics Today 25(2): 265–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, A. 2014. Fictionality and ontology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell and S. Whiteley (eds), 408–423. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. 2006. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. 1960. Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Oxford: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Gopnik, M. 1989. The development of text competence. In Text and Discourse Connectedness, M. -E. Conte, J. S. Petofi and E. Sözer (eds), 225–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grau, O. 2003. Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Green, M. C. and Brock, T. C. 2000. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79(5): 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F. 2013. Travel experiences: a typology of transportation and other absorption states in relation to types of aesthetic responses. In Wie gebannt: Aesthetische Verfahren der affektiven Bildung von Aufmerksamkeit, J. Luedke (ed.), 163–182. Berlin: Freie Universitat.Google Scholar
Hakemulder, F. and Kuijpers, M. (eds). 2017. Narrative Absorption. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, L. 2007. Antonin Artaud: From Theory to Practice. London: Greenwich Exchange: London.Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. and Doicaru, M. 2014. Exploring absorbing reading experiences: developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature 4(1): 89–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S. and Sikora S. 2004. Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today 25:(2): 171–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. S. 1950. The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. London: Geoffrey Bles.Google Scholar
1955. The Magician’s Nephew. London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Liptay, F. and Dogramaci, B. (eds). 2015. Immersion in the Visual Arts and Media: Studies in Intermediality. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Machon, J. 2013. Immersive Theatres: Intimacy and Immediacy in Contemporary Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S. and Kuiken, D. 2002. A feeling for fiction: becoming what we behold. Poetics 30: 221–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MindMOOC. 2016. How to Read a Mind. FutureLearn / University of Nottingham <[URL]> [online course, no longer publicly accessible].Google Scholar
Mumsnet (established 2000) Mumsnet – The UK’s Most Popular Parenting Website <[URL]> (January 2017).Google Scholar
Murray, J. 1998. Hamlet on the Holodeck. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nell, V. 1988. Lost in a Book: The Psychology of Reading for Pleasure. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesbit, E. 1906. The Railway Children. London: Wells, Gardner, Darton.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, M. 2000. From Mythic to Linear: Time in Children’s Literature. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
2014. Reading for Learning. Cognitive Approaches to Children’s Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, M. and Scott, C. 2006. How Picturebooks Work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Proust, M. 1927. A la Recherche du Temps Perdu (7 vols, 1919–1927). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. -L. 1999. Immersion vs. interactivity: virtual reality and literary theory. Substance 28(2): 110–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Music. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Skolnick, D. and Bloom, P. 2006. What does Batman think about SpongeBob? Children’s understanding of the fantasy/fantasy distinction. Cognition 101(1): B9–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P. 2009. Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. and Mahlberg, M. 2015. Mind-modelling with corpus stylistics in David Copperfield . Language and Literature 24(2): 129–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, P. and Wyeth, P. 2005. GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Computers in Entertainment 3(3) (July). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Heiden, H. 2004. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 28(4): 695–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eck, R. (ed.). 2010. Gaming and Cognition: Theories and Practice from the Learning Sciences. Hershey: Information Science Reference. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werth, P. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Wolf, W. 1998. Aesthetic illusion in lyric poetry? Poetica 30: 251–289.Google Scholar
2004. Aesthetic illusion as an effect of fiction. Style 38: 325–351.Google Scholar
2017. Illusion (aesthetic). In The Living Handbook of Narratology, P. Hühn, J. Pier, W. Schmid and J. Schönert (eds). Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. <[URL]> (January 2017).Google Scholar
Wolf, W., Bernhart, W. and Mahler, A. (eds). 2013. Immersion and Distance: Aesthetic Illusion in Literature and Other Media. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woolley, J. D. and Cox, V. 2007. Development of beliefs about storybook reality. Developmental Science 10: 681–693. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, S. and Kitazawa, S. 2001. Sensation at the tips of invisible tools. Nature Neuroscience 4: 979–980. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zunshine, L. 2003. Theory of mind and experimental representations of fictional consciousness. Narrative 11: 270–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Norledge, Jessica
2022. Building Dystopian Worlds. In The Language of Dystopia [Palgrave Studies in Language, Literature and Style, ], ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Pianzola, Federico
2021. Presence, flow, and narrative absorption questionnaires: a scoping review. Open Research Europe 1 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Pianzola, Federico
2021. Presence, flow, and narrative absorption questionnaires: a scoping review. Open Research Europe 1 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Statham, Simon
2020. The year’s work in stylistics 2019. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4 ► pp. 454 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.