Cover not available
Part of
Experiencing Fictional Worlds
Edited by Benedict Neurohr and Lizzie Stewart-Shaw
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 32] 2019
► pp. 119–134

Chapter 7
Constructing inferiority through comic characterisation

Self-deprecating humour and cringe comedy in High Fidelity and Bridget Jones’s Diary

This chapter draws on cognitive stylistics and psychology to explore those characterisation techniques in humorous novels which can shape readers’ responses to comic protagonists. I focus on those instances in Nick Hornby’s High Fidelity (1995) and Helen Fielding’s Bridget Jones’s Diary (1996) in which the main characters make a comparison between their own physical appearance and that of someone else’s, presenting themselves as either superior or inferior to others. While comic protagonists can be created as generally equal to the reader and more attractive than other characters so as to inspire our identification and empathy, they can also occasionally be placed in a position of inferiority where the comparison between them and others is not as favourable. It is the construction of this inferiority which, I suggest, informs the self-deprecating humour and embarrassment-induced cringe comedy in Hornby’s and Fielding’s novels.
Keywords: humorous novel, cognitive stylistics, characterisation, self-deprecating humour, cringe comedy, empathy, identification, High Fidelity , Bridget Jones’s Diary
Article outline
  • 7.1Introduction
  • 7.2Characterisation in literature and comedy
  • 7.3Constructing superiority: Cueing identification with the comic protagonist
  • 7.4Constructing inferiority: Positioning the protagonist as a target of humour
    • 7.4.1Self-deprecating humour and character likeability
    • 7.4.2Embarrassment, empathy and cringe comedy
  • 7.5Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 21 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.32.07mar
References (48)
References
Attardo, S. 2001. Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, S. and Raskin, V. 1991. Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. HUMOR 4(3–4): 293–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billig, M. 2005. Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Bortolussi, M. and Dixon, P. 2003. Psychonarratology: Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literary Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 2006. Audience identification with media characters. In Psychology of Entertainment, J. Bryant and P. Vorderer (eds), 183–197. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. 2000. A cognitive approach to characterization: Katherina in Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew . Language and Literature 9(4): 291–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. 1994. Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Madison, WI; Dubuque, IA: Brown and Benchmark.Google Scholar
Ermida, I. 2008. The Language of Comic Narratives: Humor Construction in Short Stories. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Guilty laughter: On the ethics of humour. Diacrítica, Filosofia e Cultura 23(2): 361–363.Google Scholar
Ferguson, M. A. and Ford, T. E. 2008. Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. HUMOR 21(3): 283–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fielding, H. 1996 [1998]. Bridget Jones’s Diary. London: Picador.Google Scholar
Frye, N. 1957. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, F. 2005. Privacy, embarrassment and social power: British sitcom. In Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour, S. Lockyer and M. Pickering (eds), 146–161. Basingstoke, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greengross, G. and Miller, G. 2008. Dissing oneself versus dissing rivals: Effects of status, personality, and sex on the short-term and long-term attractiveness of self-deprecating and other-deprecating humor. Evolutionary Psychology 6(3): 393–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, J. 2001. The pragmatics of humor support. HUMOR 14(1): 55–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1651 [1996]. Leviathan (edited by Richard Tuck). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hornby, N. 1995. High Fidelity. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Keen, S. 2006. A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative 14(3): 207–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Empathy and the Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
La Fave, L. 1972. Humor judgments as a function of reference groups and identification classes. In The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues, J. H. Goldstein and P. E. McGhee (eds), 195–210. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larkin Galiñanes, C. 2002. Narrative structure in humorous novels: The case of Lucky Jim . Babel A. F. I. A. L. Numero extraordinario: 141–170.Google Scholar
Lee, S. 2010. How I Escaped My Certain Fate: The Life and Deaths of a Stand-Up Comedian. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. 2008. Self-conscious emotions: Embarrassment, pride, shame, and guilt. In Handbook of Emotions. 3rd edn, M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones and L. Feldman Barrett, (eds), 742–756. New York, London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Long, D. L. and Graesser, A. C. 1988. Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes 11(1): 35–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lundy, D. E., Tan, J., and Cunningham, M. R. 1998. Heterosexual romantic preferences: The importance of humor and physical attractiveness for different types of relationships. Personal Relationships 5(3): 311–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. 2007. The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. London: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Middleton, J. 2014. Documentary’s Awkward Turn: Cringe Comedy and Media Spectatorship. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Montoro, R. 2007. Stylistics of Cappuccino Fiction: A socio-cognitive perspective. In Contemporary Stylistics, M. Lambrou and P. Stockwell (eds), 68–80. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2012. Chick Lit: The Stylistics of Cappuccino Fiction. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Oatley, K. 1994. A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics 23: 53–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raskin, V. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104(3): 192–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, A. J. and Emmott, C. 2012. Mind, Brain and Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, P. 2006. Humor: Stylistic approaches. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, K. Brown (ed), 426–429. London: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwind, K. H. 2015. Like watching a motorway crash: Exploring the embarrassment humor of The Office . HUMOR 28(1): 49–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R. 2003. Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Triezenberg, K. E. 2004. Humor enhancers in the study of humorous literature. HUMOR 17(4): 411–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandaele, J. 2002. Humor mechanisms in film comedy: Incongruity and superiority. Poetics Today 23(3): 221–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolff, H. A., Smith, C. E. and Murray, H. A. 1934. The psychology of humor. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 28(4): 341–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woodward, S. 2010. Curbing our enthusiasm: The cringe comedy of Sacha Baron Cohen, Ricky Gervais, and Larry David. Paper at Tea and Talk series, Bishop’s University.Google Scholar
Wright, B. 2011. “Why would you do that, Larry?”: Identity formation and humor in Curb Your Enthusiasm . The Journal of Popular Culture 44(3): 661–677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zillmann, D. 1983. Disparagement humor. In Handbook of Humor Research, Vol. 1, P. E. McGhee and J. H. Goldstein (eds), 85–107. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Empathy: Affective reactivity to others’ emotional experiences. In Psychology of Entertainment, J. Bryant and P. Vorderer (eds), 151–181. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Zillman, D. and Stocking, H. S. 1976. Putdown humor. Journal of Communication 26: 154–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zillmann, D. and Cantor, J. R. 1977. Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13: 155–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1976 [1996]. A disposition theory of humour and mirth. In Humour and Laughter: Theory, Research and Applications, 2nd edn, A. J. Chapman and H. C. Foot (eds), 93–116. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Lugea, Jane & Brian Walker
2023. Humour. In Stylistics, ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Montoro, Rocío & Sena Hilal Zaganor
2023. Chick Lit. English Text Construction 16:2 ► pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
Norledge, Jessica
2022. Building Dystopian Worlds. In The Language of Dystopia [Palgrave Studies in Language, Literature and Style, ], ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Statham, Simon
2020. The year’s work in stylistics 2019. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4 ► pp. 454 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.