Chapter 10
Reading the readers
Ethical and methodological issues for researching readers and reading in the digital age
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background to the study of readers and audiences
- 3.The impact of the digital
- 4.
Web 2.0 and online participatory cultures
- 5.Going beyond text
- 6.Access and anonymity: Negotiating the public versus the private
- 7.Reflexivity and the responsibilities of researchers
- 8.Mixed methods approaches
- 9.Moving from subjects to participants
- 10.Creative participatory methods
- 11.Conclusion
-
References
References (43)
Barthes, R.
1977 Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives. In
Image-Music-Text,
S. Heath (ed.), 79–124. London: Fontana.
Bell, A., Ensslin, A., Ciccoricco, D., Rustad, H., Laccetti, J. & Pressman, J.
2010 A [S]creed for Digital Fiction.
Electronic Book Review [URL] (13 March 2019).
Bond, C., Ahmed, O. H., Hind, M., Thomas, B. & Hewitt-Taylor, J.
2013 The conceptual and practical ethical dilemmas of using health discussion board posts as research data.
Journal of Medical Internet Research 15(6): e112.
Digital Reading Network
2013–15 <
[URL] (13 March 2019).
Eberly, R.
2000 Citizen Critics: Literary Public Spheres. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
E-Read
2016 <
[URL] (13 March 2019).
Evans, A. & Stasi, M.
2014 Desperately seeking methodology: New directions in fan studies research.
Participations 11(2): 4–23.
Fish, S.
1980 Is There a Text in this Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fiske, J.
1987 Television Culture. London: Routledge.
Flood, A.
2019 “It has made me want to live”: Public support for lesbian novelist Radclyffe Hall over banned book revealed.
The Guardian 10 January 2019
[URL] (13 March 2019).
Fuller, D. & Rehberg Sedo, D.
2012 Mixing it up: Using mixed methods research to invesigate contemporary cultures of reading. In
From Codex to Hypertext: Reading at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century,
A. Lang (ed.), 234–251. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Fuller, D. & Rehberg Sedo, D.
2019 “Boring, frustrating, impossible”: Tracing the negative affects of reading from interviews to Story Circles.
Participations 16(1): 622–655.
Gauntlett, D.
2011 Making is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Creativity from DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Georgakopolou, A.
2017 “Whose context collapse?”: Ethical clashes in the study of language and social media in context.
Applied Linguistics Review 8(2/3): 169–190.
Giaxoglou, K.
2017 Reflections on internet research ethics from language-focused research on web-based mourning: Revisiting the private/public distinction as a language ideology of differentiation.
Applied Linguistics Review 8(2/3): 229–250.
Hall, S.
1980 Encoding/Decoding. In
Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79,
S. Hall,
D. Hobson,
A. Lowe,
P. Willis (eds), 128–39. London: Hutchinson.
Hartley, J.
1987 Invisible fictions: Television audiences, paedocracy, pleasure.
Textual Practice 1(2): 121–138.
Hobson, D.
1991 Soap operas at work. In
Remote Control: Television, Audiences and Cultural Power,
E. Seiter,
H. Borchers,
G. Kreutzner &
E-M. Warth (eds), 150–167. London: Routledge.
Kennedy, H.
2006 Beyond anonymity, or future directions for internet identity research.
New Media and Society 8(6): 859–876.
Kozinets, R. V.
2010 Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage.
Lambrou, M.
2014 Narratives of trauma re-lived: the ethnographer’s paradox and other tales. In
Real Lives, Celebrity Stories: Narratives of Ordinary and Extraordinary People Across Media,
B. Thomas &
J. Round (eds), 113–128. London: Bloomsbury.
Landow, G.
1997 Hypertext 2.0. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Marwick, A. & boyd, D.
2011 I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse and the imagined audience.
New Media and Society 13: 114–133.
Morley, D.
1986 Family Television. London: Comedia.
Nakamura, L.
2013 “Words with friends”: Socially networked reading on Goodreads
.
PMLA 128(1): 238–243.
Page, R.
2017 Ethics revisited: Rights, responsibilities and relationships in online research.
Applied Linguistics Review 8(2/3): 315–320.
Page, R., Barton, D., Unger, J. & Zappavigna, M.
2014 Researching Language and Social Media. London: Routledge.
Page, R. & Thomas, B.
2011 Introduction. In
New Narratives: Stories and Storytelling in the Digital Age,
R. Page &
B. Thomas (eds), 1–16. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Reading Digital Fiction
2014–17 <
[URL] (13 March 2019).
Reading Experience Database
2006- <
[URL] (13 March 2019).
Reading on Screen
2017–18 <
[URL] (13 March 2019).
Researching Readers Online
2012 <
[URL] (13 March 2019).
Spilioti, T.
2017 Media convergence and publicness: Towards a modular and iterative approach to online research ethics.
Applied Linguistics Review 8(2/3): 191–212.
Tagg, C., Lyons, A., Hu, R. & Rock, F.
2017 The ethics of digital ethnography in a team project.
Applied Linguistics Review 8(2/3): 271–292.
The Harry Potter Alliance
Thomas, B.
2007 Canons and Fanons: Literary fanfiction online.
Dichtung Digital.
[URL] (19 March 2019).
Thomas, B.
2011a What is fanfiction and why are people saying such nice things about it? Storyworlds 3: 1–24.
Thomas, B.
2011b Trickster authors and tricky readers on the MZD forums. In
Mark Z. Danielewski,
J. Bray &
A. Gibbons (eds), 86–102. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Thomas, B.
2014 Fans behaving badly? real person fic and the blurring of the boundaries between the public and the private. In
Real Lives, Celebrity Stories: Narratives of Ordinary and Extraordinary People Across Media,
B. Thomas &
J. Round (eds), 171–185. London: Bloomsbury.
Thomas, B. & Round, J.
2016 Moderating readers and reading online.
Language and Literature 25(3): 239–253.
Thomas, B.
2017 Whose Story is it Anyway? Following Everyday Accounts of Living with Dementia on Social Media.
Style 51 (3): 357–373.
Whiteman, N.
2007
The establishment, maintenance and destabilisation of fandom: A study of two online communities and an exploration of issues pertaining to internet research
. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Institute of Education, London.
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Price, Hazel
2022.
The year’s work in stylistics 2021.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:4
► pp. 519 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.