Chapter 11
Extra-textuality and affective intensities
Moving out from readers to people, places, and things
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Extending reading and the extra-textual
- 3.Assemblages of bodies, materials, environments, and texts
- 3.1Affect and stylistics
- 3.2Affect and literacy studies
- 3.3Literacy as ideological and multitudinous
- 3.4Relational practices
- 3.5Immersion, pleasure and affect
- 4.
The extra-textual in the analysis of writing
- 4.1“Un-thinking” with Grimm & Co: Background and methodology
- 4.2The coming together of people, places and things, in the creation of a story
- 5.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Note
-
References
References (36)
References
Bell, A., Ensslin, A., Ciccoricco, D., Rustad, H., Laccetti, J. & Pressman, J. 2010. A [S]creed for Digital Fiction. Electronic Book Review <[URL]> (13 March 2019).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bell, A., Ensslin, A, Van Der Bom, I. & Smith, J. 2018. Immersion in digital fiction. International Journal of Literary Linguistics 7(1). (19 November 2019). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burnett, C. & Merchant, G. 2015. The Challenge of 21st-Century Literacies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 59(3): 271–274. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burnett, C. & Merchant, G. 2016. Boxes of poison: Baroque technique as antidote to simple views of literacy. Journal of Literacy Research 48(3): 258–279. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burnett, C. & Merchant, G. 2018. Affective encounters: enchantment and the possibility of reading for pleasure. Literacy, 52(2): 62–69. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, J. 2014. (Im)material girls living in (im)material worlds: Identity curation through time and space. In New Literacies Around the Globe: Policy and Pedagogy, C. Burnett, J. Davies, G. Merchant & J. Rowsell (eds), 72–87. New York, NY: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ehret, C. 2018. Moments of teaching and learning in a children’s hospital: Affects, textures, and temporalities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 49(1): 53–71. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ensslin, A. 2012. ‘“I want to say I may have seen my son die this morning”’: Unintentional unreliable narration in digital fiction. Language and Literature 21(2): 136–149. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Escott, H. & Pahl, K. 2017. Learning from ninjas: Young people’s films as a lens for an expanded view of literacy and language. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 40(6): 803–815.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Escott, H., Christie, S., Hodson, J., & Bullivant, D. (forthcoming) ‘‘Unruly Rules’: Using defamiliarisation to tinker with punctuation in creative writing workshops’. In: Mclean, C., & Rowsell, J., (eds) (forthcoming). Maker Literacies and Maker Identities in the Digital Age. Abingdon: Routledge
Frijda, N. H. 1998. The laws of emotion. American Psychologist. 43(5): 349–358. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foster, K. & Foster, K. 2012. The importance of the unfamiliar and unexpected in creative teaching, interpretation and learning. In What is Research-Led Teaching: Multi-disciplinary Perspectives, A. Miller, J. Sharp & J. Strong (eds), 106–115. Consortium for Research Excellent Support and Training CREST.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frijda, N. H. (1998). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43(5), 349–358. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gavins, J. 2007. Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbons, A. 2012. Multimodality, Cognition, and Experimental Literature. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbons, A., & Whiteley, S. 2018. Contemporary Stylistics: Language, Cognition, Interpretation. Edinburgh University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hackett A., Pahl K. & Pool S. 2017. In amongst the glitter and the squashed blueberries: crafting a collaborative lens for children's literacy pedagogy in a community setting. Pedagogies: An International Journal. 12(1), pp.58–73.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herman, D. 1994. Textual you and double deixis in Edna O’Brien’s A Pagan Place
. Style 28(3): 378–410.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuby, C. R. 2017. Why a paradigm shift of “more than human ontologies” is needed: Putting to work poststructural and posthuman theories in writers’ studio. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 30(9): 877–896. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lazarus, R. 1999. The cognition-emotion debate: A bit of history. In Dalgleish, T. & Power, M. (eds)The Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Chichester: John Wiley, pp.3–19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leander, K., Aziz, S., Botzakis, S., Ehret, C., Landry, D. & Rowsell, J. 2017. Readings and experiences of multimodality. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice 66(1): 95–116.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leander, K., & Boldt, G. 2013. Rereading “A pedagogy of multiliteracies”. Journal of Literacy Research 45(1): 22–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lenters, K. 2016. Riding the Lines and Overwriting in the Margins: Affect and Multimodal Literacy Practices. Journal of Literacy Research, 48(3), 280–316. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of Affect. Polity.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miall, D. 2014. Emotions, feelings and stylistics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, Stockwell, P. & Whiteley, S. (eds), 424–438). Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
New London Group. 1996. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review 66(1): 60–93. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peplow, D., Swann, J., Trimarco, P. & Whiteley, S. (2015). The Discourse of Reading Groups: Integrating Cognitive and Sociocultural Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shklovsky, V. 1965 [1917]. Art as Technique. In Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, L. Lemon & M. J. Reis (eds), 3–4. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stockwell, P. (2009). The cognitive poetics of literary resonance. Language and Cognition, 1(1), 25–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stockwell P., 2014. Atmosphere and tone. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds), 36–374. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Street, B. 1993. Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wargo, J. 2018. Writing with wearables? Young children’s intra-active authoring and the sounds of emplaced invention. Journal of Literacy Research 50(4): 502–523. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whiteley S 2016. Building Resonant Worlds: Experiencing the Text-Worlds of The Unconsoled In World Building: Discourse in the Mind ,Gavins J & Lahey E. (eds), 165–182. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whiteley, S. & Canning, P. 2017. Reader response research in stylistics. Language and Literature 26(2): 71–87. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woodhall, A. 2015. Rummaging as a strategy for creative thinking and imaginative engagement in Higher Education. In Engaging the Senses: Object-Based Learning in Higher Education, H. Chatterjee & L. Hannan (eds), 133–155. Surrey: Ashgate.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Price, Hazel
2022.
The year’s work in stylistics 2021.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:4
► pp. 519 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.