Article published in:
Second Language Acquisition of Turkish
Edited by Ayşe Gürel
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 59] 2016
► pp. 1948
References

References

Akita, M.O.
2006Global foreign accent and classroom input in L2 perception and production. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (eds), 1–14. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2007Global foreign accent and the effectiveness of a prosody-oriented approach in EFL classrooms. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , H. Caunt-Nulton, S. Kulatilake & I. Woo (eds), 46–57. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Archibald, J.
1992Transfer of L1 parameter settings: Some evidence from Polish metrics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37: 301–339.Google Scholar
1993Language Learnability and L2 Phonology: The Acquisition of Metrical Parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Second language phonology, phonetics, and typology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 190–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beck, M.L.
1998L2 acquisition and obligatory head movement: English-speaking learners of German and the local impairment hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 311–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M.E.
1986Stress and Non-stress Accent. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belikova, A.
2008Explicit instruction vs. linguistic competence in adult L2-acquisition. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , H. Chan, E. Kapia & H. Jacob (eds), 48–59. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
2013Getting L2 Reflexive and Reciprocal Verbs Right. PhD dissertation, McGill University.
Berwick, R.C.
1985The Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R.
1990The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis 20: 3–49.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D.
2011Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 5.2.27, retrieved March 2011 from http://​www​.praat​.org/Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. & Hong, U.
1995Agreement and null subjects in German L2 development: New evidence from reaction-time experiments. Second Language Research 11: 57–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demircan, Ö.
1996Türkçenin Ses Dizimi. İstanbul: Der Yayınevi.Google Scholar
Demuth, K.
1995Markedness and development of prosodic structure. In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS 25), J. Beckman (ed.), 13–25. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Dresher, E. & Kaye, J.
1990A computational learning model for metrical phonology. Cognition 34: 137–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erguvanlı, E.
1984The Function of Word Order in Turkish Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Erkü, F.
1983Discourse Pragmatics and Word Order in Turkish. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Féry, C.
2001Focus and phrasing in French. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, C. Féry & W. Sternefeld (eds), 153–181. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P.
1994On the Acquisition of Prosodic Structure. PhD dissertation, HIL dissertations 6, Leiden University. The Hague: HAG.
Flynn, S. & Martohardjono, G.
1994Mapping from the initial state to the final state: the separation of universal principles and language-specific principles. In Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Crosslinguistic Perspectives, Vol. 1: Heads, Projections and Learnability, B. Lust, M. Suner & J. Whitman (eds), 319–335. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fry, D.
1955Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27: 765–768. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goad, H.
1997Codas, word minimality, and empty-headed syllables. In Child Language Research Forum 28, E.V. Clark (ed.), 113–122. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
To appear. Phonological processes in child speech. In The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Linguistics, J. Lidz, W. Snyder & J. Pater (eds) Oxford OUP
Goad, H. & Prévost, A.E.
2011A test case for markedness: The acquisition of Québec French stress. Ms, McGill University.
Goad, H. & White, L.
2004Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: Effects of L1 prosodic structure. In EUROSLA Yearbook, S. Foster-Cohen, M. Sharwood Smith, A. Sorace & M. Ota (eds), 119–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research 22: 243–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Prosodic structure and the representation of L2 functional morphology: A nativist approach. Lingua 118: 577–594. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goad, H., White, L. & Steele, J.
2003Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48: 243–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, M.
2014Disentangling stress and pitch-accent: A typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. In Word Accent: Theoretical and Typological Issues, H. van der Hulst (ed.), 83–118. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C.
2005Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. New York NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.-R.
1987An Essay on Stress. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. & Chan, C.Y.
1997The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis’. Second Language Research 13: 187–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, B.
1981A Metrical Theory of Stress Rules. PhD dissertation, MIT. (Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club).
1995Metrical Stress Ttheory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hualde, J.I., Elordieta, G., Gamind, I. & Smiljanic, R.
2002From pitch-accent to stress-accent in Basque. In Laboratory Phonology 7, C. Gussenhoven, N. Warner & T. Rietveld (eds), 547–584. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L.M.
2014Do all languages have word accent? In Word Accent: Theoretical and Typological Issues, H. van der Hulst (ed.), 56–82. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, S. & Orgun, C.O.
1998Level (non)ordering in recursive morphology: Evidence from Turkish. In Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, S.G. Lapointe, D.K. Brentari & P.M. Farrell (eds), 360–410. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2003Turkish stress: A review. Phonology 20: 139–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
İşsever, S.
2003Information structure in Turkish: The word order-prosody interface. Lingua 113: 1025–1053. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
İpek, C.
2011Phonetic realization of focus with no on-focus pitch-range expansion in Turkish. In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhs 17) , W.-S. Lee & E. Zee (eds), 140–143.
İpek, C. & Zubizarreta, M.L.
2014Nuclear stress as an abstract rhythmic notion: Evidence from Turkish. Paper presented at the 10th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics , MIT, Cambridge MA.
Jun, S.-A. & Fougeron, C.
2000A phonological model of French intonation. In Intonation: Analysis, Modelling and Technology, A. Botinis (ed.), 209–242. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kabak, B. & Vogel, I.
2001The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology 18: 315–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamali, B.
2011Topics at the PF Interface in Turkish. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Kılıçaslan, Y.
1994Information Packaging in Turkish. MA thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Konrot, A.
1981Physical correlates of linguistic stress in Turkish. University of Sussex Language Centre Occasional Papers 24: 26–52.Google Scholar
1987Stress in Turkish: Is it determined phonologically or morphologically? In Studies on Modern Turkish: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Turkish Linguistics , H. E. Boeschoten & L.T. Verhoeven (eds). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
Kornfilt, J.
1997Turkish Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ladd, D.R.
1996Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P.
1960Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32: 451–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, M. & Prince, A.
1977On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 249–336.Google Scholar
Marcus, M.P.
1980A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A.
1986Prosodic morphology. Ms, Brandeis University and University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
NesporM. & Vogel, I.
1986Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Özçelik, Ö.
2011Redefining the Prosodic Hierarchy. Paper presented at Phonology in the 21st Century: In Honour of Glyne Piggott , McGill University, Montréal.
2013Exceptions in stress assignment: Feet in input. In Proceedings of 40th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 40) , S. Kan, C. Moore-Cantwell & R. Staubs (eds). Amherst MA: GLSA.
2014Prosodic faithfulness to foot edges: The case of Turkish stress. Phonology 31: 229–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
To appear. The Foot is not an obligatory constituent of the Prosodic Hierarchy: “stress” in Turkish, French and child English. The Linguistic Review [forthcoming 2017].
Özçelik, Ö & Nagai, M.
2010Possible syntactic subject positions in Turkish: Evidence from phonology. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL 6) [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 61], Hiroki Maezawa & Azusa Yokogoshi (eds). Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Özçelik, Ö. & Nagai, M.
2011Multiple subject positions: A case of perfect match between syntax and prosody. In Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference for Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 28) , M.Byram & B. Tomaszewicz (eds), 303–312. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Özge, U.
2012Notes on focus projection in Turkish. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics , É. Kincses-Nagy & M. Biacsi (eds), 141–154. Szeged: Studia Uralo-Altaica.
Pater, J.
1997Metrical parameter missetting in second language acquisition. In Focus on Phonological Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 16], S.J. Hannahs & M. Young-Scholten (eds), 235–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, G. & Lehiste, I.
1960Duration and syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 32: 693–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Post, B.
2003French phrasing and accentuation in different speaking styles. In Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 8, E. Grabe & D. Wright (eds), 69–83.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. & Sprouse, R.
1994Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 8], T. Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (eds), 317–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. & Sprouse,B.
1996L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research 12: 40–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E.
1984Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1986On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology 3: 371–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A.
2007Bridging the Gap between Theoretical Linguistics and Psycholinguistics in L2 Phonology: The Acquisition and Processing of Word Stress by French Canadian L2 learners of English. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai’i.
Trofimovich, P. & Baker, W.
2006Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28: 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I.M. & Sorace, A.
2006Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax–semantics and syntax–discourse phenomena. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (eds), 653–664. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
White, L.
1989aLinguistic universals, markedness and learnability: comparing two different approaches. Second Language Research 5: 127–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989bUniversal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, M.L.
1998Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

White, Lydia
2018.  In Bilingual Cognition and Language [Studies in Bilingualism, 54],  pp. 57 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.